Cloud Repatriation: Strategic Move or Step Backward?
Marcel Koert
Innovative Platform Engineer | DevOps Engineer | Site Reliability Engineer | IT Educator | Founder of Melomar-IT
Cloud Repatriation: Strategic Move or Step Backward?
When cloud was the shining path to infrastructure nirvana—scalable, flexible, and cost-efficient—few organizations paused to ask whether they were stretching too far. Fast-forward to 2025, and that fervor has given way to a new question: is moving workloads back on-premises—or embracing hybrid models—a strategic return or a retreat?
Riding the Wave… and Then Hitting a Crest
Back in 2020, during the pandemic-driven digital acceleration, the public cloud seemed like a natural ally. But as companies matured in their cloud journeys, many began to notice creeping bills, performance glitches, and tighter data governance demands. In fact, a Barclays CIO survey reported that 83% of enterprises planned to shift workloads off public clouds, and 94% of IT leaders had already launched cloud repatriation efforts .
And new reports signal that those moves are real. A recent Liquid Web survey shows 42% of IT professionals shifted workloads away from public clouds in the past year, often due to cost, compliance, and a quest for more predictable infrastructure . In the UK, concerns over data sovereignty and vendor lock-in have driven hybrid or repatriation strategies—45% of UK enterprises intend to limit data exposure to U.S.-based providers .
Two Contrasting Perspectives
On one hand, the critics of full cloud adoption argue that repatriation is a smart recalibration—especially for businesses wrestling with cloud sprawl. By bringing workloads on-premises or into private cloud environments, firms are gaining cost control, stronger performance, and tighter compliance.
One infographic from OpenText illustrates this shift vividly: around 60% of organizations report cost savings of more than 25%, while over half report improved performance and operational control from repatriated workloads . AI and ML workloads, long-running and data-intensive, are prime candidates for this shift in the next 12–24 months .
MinIO even found enterprises cutting costs by as much as 60% when migrating workloads back on-prem—thanks to lower egress and object storage fees—while delivering strong performance via open, modular infrastructure .
But on the other hand, cloud evangelists rightly warn that repatriation isn’t a blanket recommendation. Eschewing cloud can mean lost agility, increased overhead, and upfront investments. Puppet points out that while cost, security, and performance are key drivers, potential pitfalls include capital expenditures, reduced elasticity, and complexity in migration planning .
Computer Weekly adds that firms face long lead times for hardware, hefty egress charges, and barriers to scaling quickly . And IDC research outlined that although full cloud repatriation remains rare—only about 8–9% of organizations withdraw entirely—many are going selective, targeting specific workloads like backups or critical production systems .
Thought-Provoking Questions to Ponder
What if we reframed the debate around nuance, not absolutes? These questions may spark deeper thinking:
Practical Approaches: Strategic Integration, Not a U-Turn
One sensible path is phased repatriation, starting with development or containerized workloads that carry lower risk. Mirantis recommends this carefully phased strategy to ease transitions while maintaining business continuity .
Then there’s hybrid cloud adoption, where enterprises retain public cloud for bursty or customer-facing workloads, while migrating predictable or compliance-sensitive workloads back in-house. Asanti’s UK survey shows many regretted going “all-in” and instead favor hybrid from the start .
A different tactic is layering open and composable infrastructure on-prem, as MinIO suggests—deploying disaggregated stacks for compute and storage that allow modular scaling and control, with performance rivaling hyperscalers .
And let’s not forget the AI-specific shift: as data grows richer and models heavier, many enterprises are opting to train and host AI workloads on-prem. Kyndryl points out that AI pushes cost, sovereignty, and performance considerations front and center .
Wrapping It All Together
Cloud repatriation isn’t a retreat—it’s a tactical realignment.
For organizations with predictable demand, regulatory complexity, or AI-intensive needs, bringing workloads back can mean lower costs, improved performance, and greater control. But it also requires intentional planning, upfront investment, and nimble governance.
Shift your posture from “cloud vs. on-prem” to “cloud and on-prem.” The smartest strategy tailors infrastructure to workload, not the other way around.
References