Crafting a compelling "Agentization" Vision for your enterprise
Background
Past couple of weeks, I’ve had several deep conversations with enterprise leaders who are at the forefront of driving AI and AI Agents transformation within their organizations. These conversations spanned across vision, business strategy, technical architecture, execution plans — and most importantly, the execution challenges.
As these leaders define their respective enterprise AI and Agentization strategy, Business goals/vision, competitive scenario and current technology/people realities were on top of their mind, besides the real technical complexity of actually executing it.
The vision/goals in the above context meant enterprise or business unit vision, essentially prize that an enterprise is setting for itself to the aspirational future state (3 to 5 years) that an organization aims to acheive for itself, Strategy (1-3 years), Execution (now to 12 months) all align up to that acheive the strategic prize.
👉 Should enterprises craft a distinct vision specifically for agentization — separate from their broader business vision or IT transformation vision?
Why should enterprises have a seperate vision for "Agentization"
Agentization is not just AI: It redefines roles, workflows, and interfaces. It demands we rethink org structures, accountability, compliance, and even how we define "work."
It impacts core architecture: Most enterprises have built systems optimized for human use — dashboards, approvals, workflows. But agents need APIs, autonomy, observability, and trust frameworks.
Vision shapes priority: Without a focused vision, agent initiatives often get diluted in broader AI or automation programs, missing their full transformative potential.
Strategy without vision is shooting without a goal: A clear agentization vision helps align product, engineering, operations, and risk teams around what's coming — and what needs to be built or dismantled.
Potential of wide-spread disruption across industry sectors: We are witnessing very very early rise of AI-first players in every sector and this will likely significantly accelerate in next couple of years. This shift is poised to threaten every enterprise's current competitiveness and significantly reorder the industry landscape, reshaping the stack rankings across industries.
In such a transformative era, the approach one takes to guiding one's strategy, execution, and architecture for this agentized future cannot be treated as business-as-usual. It demands deeper, deliberate thinking and sharper foresight. The choices you make today will determine whether you become a disruptor — or get disrupted. Considering the above factors, I am absolutely convinced that enterprises must craft a seperate vision for Agentizated future than AI or Technology /Cloud vision.
It must be aspirational, aligns with-and contributes to the broader business vision.
A clear and compelling agentization vision, rooted in the enterprise’s future aspirations, can serve as a strategic north star—guiding multi-year execution and aligning all technology initiatives toward a unified goal.
Assuming I've nudged you enough to start thinking about your enterprise’s Agentization vision — let’s now explore how to shape it.
Defining the core principles of a Strong Agentization Vision
Firstly like any vision defining exercise, you clearly want to have all the stackholders identified who can energize this exercise. Like any vision, Agentization vision must have all the basic tenants of the good vision.
Inspiring – Motivates people emotionally and intellectually.
Aspirational and Lofty– Goes beyond current limitations or market status. Not the easiest thing for an enterprise to climb and achieive, but needs it to work hard and jump high enough to get to it.
Future-focused – Describes where you want to be, not where you are.
Guiding – Informs decision-making and trade-offs across strategy and execution.
Concise and Memorable – Easy to communicate and align people around.
Removing the core tension/debate around crafting a vision
Whenever one talks about crafting a vision there is this tension/push and pull around whether the vision should be informed by current realities, or should it start with imagination and bold idea? Start by debating the same with your stackholders and removing the tension. Here are some of the arguments in favor of both the approaches.
✅ Why Vision Should Be Informed by Current Realities
🧭 Credibility & Alignment: If your AI vision sounds completely disconnected from your tech maturity, org structure, or industry constraints — it will be dismissed as wishful thinking. Ground it enough to resonate.
🏗️ Strategic Anchoring: Legacy systems? Regulatory headwinds? Cultural readiness? These aren’t blockers — they’re design inputs. Know where you are to know how to move.
🏁 Competitive Differentiation: Understanding your market position and your competitors' moves helps sharpen your vision to stand out, not just sound good.
🤝 Cultural Adoption: A bold vision that no one can relate to internally? That’s a recipe for resistance. Connect it to your people’s day-to-day reality.
❌ Why Vision Should Not Be Limited by Current Realities
🌟 Aspirational Power: The best visions stretch. They ignite belief and unlock ambition. If it's easy, it’s not a vision — it’s a to-do list.
🧪 Innovation Catalyst: Status quo won't lead to reinvention. A transformative vision needs to push boundaries — even if your team, data, or tech stack isn’t “there” yet.
🧭 North Star for Strategy: Vision is about what good looks like. Constraints live in your roadmap — not in your aspiration.
I personally believe that a strong agentization vision must absolutely start with imagination, and not not be limited by current realities.
However, an alternate approach could be balancing boldness with grounded realities.
Practical Tips: How to Balance It
Think of vision-setting as a loop, not a linear process:
Start with bold aspiration
Test and temper it against current realities
Refine with phased ambition
Repeat as you make progress
Let vision lead confidently. Let strategy and execution close the gap.
Levels of Enterprise "Agentization" Vision
AI as a Strategic Multiplier: Enabling employees to deliver faster insights, deeper customer understanding, and entirely new ways to solve our biggest challenges
Human + Machine Amplification: Build a future where every employee’s creativity and impact is amplified by trusted AI systems that automate the mundane and elevate the meaningful.
AI Centered Organisation: We envision building an AI-centered organization, where autonomous agents drive execution, humans steer strategy, and intelligence flows through every function, system, and interaction.
The AI-Native Org Vision: We envision becoming an AI-native enterprise, where every workflow is optimized, every decision is assisted, and every customer experience is intelligently personalized.
Working on the "Agentization" vision statement
A strong agentization vision statement should answer 3 key questions:
Purpose: Why does Agentization matter for us, our customers, our competitive positioning and our future value?
Ambition: What future are we building? Pro-tip, be bold, paint a lofty goal a mission, that takes hard for you to climb. Donot worry about technical challenges or current ground realities at this stage.
Differentiaton: What will make this Agentization journey unique? Connect all enterprise structured/unstructured data and knowledge context, people and producitivty, accelerating product innovation
Finalizing & Phrasing the vision
The importance — and difficulty — of articulating a compelling, credible Agentization vision. A good vision isn’t just a tagline. It’s a north star that guides your investments, aligns teams, attracts talent, and differentiates you in the market.
Example: "We envision becoming an AI Agent-native enterprise, where every workflow is optimized, every decision is assisted, and every customer experience is intelligently personalized."
Tailor the same to your industry specific needs and align it with your overall business vision.
Conclusion
For agentization to succeed, strategy and execution must be tightly aligned with your overarching business vision.
Creating a dedicated Agentization Vision acts as a vital bridge — connecting your long-term business goals with the practical roadmap for deploying AI agents effectively.
Strategic, human-centric solutions using data.
3wThanks for next topic in your series because where "some" sectors' cross-domains continue to struggle because their tasks do "not" net "measurable" outcomes (such as reduced customer + employee churn, free cash flow, other measures of enduring $ sustainability).
Next in the series, How do you align Agent Strategy with the vision, before we get down to execution. Do subscribe below here.. 1. https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7308347941369389058/ Link to first post here... 2. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/agentic-ai-introduction-journey-new-operating-paradigm-rajesh-parikh-nk96c/
Strategic, human-centric solutions using data.
3wExcellent read! Especially appreciated: -Practical Tips: How to Balance It -Levels of Enterprise "Agentization" Vision
Totally agree with these points, what I liked most is this point "It impacts core architecture: Most enterprises have built systems optimized for human use — dashboards, approvals, workflows. But agents need APIs, autonomy, observability, and trust frameworks."
Co-Founder @ Carver | Agents | FinAI | Scribble Data | IITB | USC
3wEric Schmidt in his talk a couple of days back spoke about importance of timing in making such calls. I think12 months from now all these would be 'obvious' if the current trends hold.