The Cybersecurity Tech Adoption Curve is Steepening—Here’s What CISOs Need to Know

The Cybersecurity Tech Adoption Curve is Steepening—Here’s What CISOs Need to Know

This week, I deeply reviewed my notes and the available slides from the Gartner Webinar (from June, recently repeated) the “2025 Technology Adoption Roadmap for Security and Risk Management.”  For a detailed look at the actual statistics and insights from their survey and analysis, go to this page: https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/technology-adoption-roadmaps, where you can sign up (should be free), watch the webinar, and get the slides. 

What follows comes from reviewing my notes and comparing their perspective side-by-side with what we’ve learned from our own CxO Security Forum gatherings, which bring together some of the smartest CISOs, CIOs, and #GRC leaders I know. The contrast—and the overlap—was striking. It revealed not just what’s trending in security tech, but also how the real challenges and opportunities go far beyond the next tool or platform.


1. Deployment Is Accelerating—but Tools Aren’t the Answer

Organizations are deploying cybersecurity technologies at an unprecedented rate. Enterprises no longer have the luxury of long evaluation cycles—new risks, regulatory pressures, and AI-driven changes are forcing faster decisions.

But speed alone isn’t the differentiator. At our executive briefings, many CISOs have pointed out that the real challenge isn’t buying the latest tool but building the right strategy, team, and processes to make those investments meaningful.

💡 CxO Forum insight: One #CISO put it bluntly—“The tool isn’t the solution. It’s the team that knows how to use it, and the process that makes it stick.”


2. Data Security Has Become the Strategic Backbone

One clear trend—both from Gartner’s analysis and from our peer conversations—is that data security is moving to the center of the enterprise security strategy. As organizations scale their use of AI and large data pipelines, safeguarding sensitive information is becoming as much about resilience and trust as it is about compliance.

At recent CxO Security Forum discussions, leaders have described data security as the “foundation layer” that enables innovation. Without strong controls—data classification, posture management, and encryption—rolling out AI or cloud-first strategies becomes a game of chance.


3. Generative AI Is Reshaping Security Priorities

Generative AI is more than just a new risk surface; it’s changing the nature of security itself. Enterprises are experimenting with AI-powered detection, response, and analysis tools—but they’re also rethinking governance.

In our conversations with CISOs, a recurring theme is the need for clear AI-specific policies and accountability. One leader summed it up perfectly: “We treat #GenAI like a junior developer with admin access—it’s fast, unpredictable, and can break everything if we’re not careful.”

Gartner’s roadmap highlighted the same trend: security teams are not just adding AI to their toolkit, they’re building frameworks to secure AI itself—tools for model risk management, runtime prompt protection, and privacy-preserving AI.


4. Vendor Complexity Is a Growing Liability

Most enterprises are juggling far too many security vendors—and it’s starting to cost them in both efficiency and visibility. Whether it’s overlapping dashboards, weak integrations, or strained internal teams, the vendor sprawl problem is top of mind for many of the executives we engage with.

At our regional forums, the consensus has been that simplification—through consolidation or platform strategies—is the path forward. As one participant said, “I don’t want 50 dashboards anymore. I want 5 tools that talk to each other and actually do what they claim.”


5. Governance Is Becoming the New Competitive Edge

What’s clear across every conversation is that governance—not technology—is the new battleground. The organizations that stand out are the ones investing in decision-making frameworks, cross-functional accountability, and real-time risk management.

This trend is particularly visible when it comes to AI. Security leaders are assigning oversight roles, embedding AI reviews into internal audits, and educating stakeholders on responsible usage. It’s a cultural shift as much as it is a technical one.


From Analyst Reports to Real-World Conversations

Gartner’s roadmap provided a valuable lens into how security and risk management leaders are prioritizing investments. But what resonated most for me was how closely these findings mirrored the candid conversations happening inside the CxO Security Forum.

Our community of CISOs, CIOs, and GRC leaders is tackling these challenges not from the sidelines, but in the trenches—where budgets, board expectations, and threat actors collide. What I’ve learned from both Gartner and our own forums is that the future of security isn’t about “more tools.” It’s about clarity—knowing which levers to pull, which risks truly matter, and how to align people and processes to drive resilience.

NOTE: I have always paid close attention to Gartner’s analysis. Despite any qualms people surface about them (or Forrester, IDC, etc.) the wealth of knowledge and industry education that is obtainable by paying attention to what they say is extremely important for executives in many industries.  At the same time, prudence advocates taking that information and tuning it with your own experiences as well as comparing notes with #InfoSec industry peers in a community setting. 

If you're a senior executive focused on #cybersecurity, #riskmanagement, or #AI, I’d love for you to join these conversations at the CxO Security Forum. We’re building a trusted space for leaders to exchange ideas, challenge assumptions, and shape the future of enterprise security—together.

#datasecurity #governance #strategy

Yakir Golan

CEO & Co-founder at Kovrr | Cyber Risk Quantification

5d

Absolutely. No tool or platform is going to be the end-all "solution." It can support resilience building, but that doesn't cancel out the implementation investment that's still very much required. What’s also needed is clarity around how much exposure the tool helps reduce, and weighing that reduction against the costs (time, resources, complexity). Without this, strategic decisions around tech adoption become guesswork and lead to wasted resources and unnecessary vulnerabilites. This kind of thinking is also key to tackling tech sprawl in a more intentional, value-driven way. Really interesting insights.

Like
Reply

Interesting insights! Truly, the focus should be on strong, adaptable security strategies, not just adding more tools. Collaboration and real-world experience are key to staying ahead in 2025. Cheers, NetFend - Network Defense & Security

Like
Reply

Michael Hiskey - This is a stellar synthesis of analyst insight and ground truth from the field. The delta between 'what’s trending' and 'what’s actually working' is often where the real strategy lives. Completely agree that the real competitive advantage lies not in the tech stack itself, but in how well it’s governed, integrated, and aligned to organizational risk priorities. Appreciate the transparency and depth in this reflection. Conversations like these are exactly what the security community needs more of. Looking forward to learning more from the CxO Forum.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics