Different Ways To Make Communication For The Cross Framework

Below is a detailed list of strategies you can use to enable communication between Angular, React micro frontends, and Web Components, along with their pros and cons:

1. Custom Events & Event Listeners

How it works:

• Web components (or even Angular/React components wrapped as custom elements) can dispatch standard CustomEvent events.
• Other components or the hosting application listen for these events and react accordingly.

Pros:

• Framework Agnostic: Works naturally with any framework that renders to the DOM.
• Decoupled: Components remain independent and only need to know the event contract (event name and payload).
• Native Browser Support: No additional libraries required.

Cons:

• Limited Data Handling: Only simple data structures can be passed via event.detail.
• Event Naming Conventions: Requires careful naming to avoid conflicts.
• Debugging Complexity: Tracing events across multiple layers can be challenging.

2. Shared Global State / Store (e.g., Redux, NgRx, RxJS)

How it works:

• Use a centralized state management solution to hold shared data.
• Each micro frontend subscribes to changes in the global store and dispatches actions to update the state.

Pros:

• Single Source of Truth: Easy to track and manage state changes across micro frontends.
• Predictable Data Flow: Follows well-established patterns (e.g., Redux’s unidirectional data flow).
• Enhanced Debugging: Tools like Redux DevTools help track state mutations.

Cons:

• Added Complexity: Setting up and maintaining a global store adds overhead.
• Potential Coupling: Micro frontends become indirectly coupled through the shared state.
• Learning Curve: Requires familiarity with state management patterns and libraries.

3. Pub/Sub Pattern / Event Bus

How it works:

• Implement an event bus (using libraries like RxJS Subjects or a custom pub/sub service).
• Components publish events to the bus, and any interested subscriber can react.

Pros:

• Loose Coupling: Publishers and subscribers don’t need direct references to each other.
• Flexibility: Can handle many-to-many communication scenarios.
• Scalable: Suitable for applications with a large number of micro frontends.

Cons:

• Debugging Challenges: Tracing event flow across a bus can be difficult.
• Potential for Memory Leaks: Unsubscribing properly is crucial to avoid resource issues.
• Overhead: Managing subscriptions and ensuring timely clean-up adds some complexity.

4. Global Window Messaging (e.g., window.postMessage)

How it works:

• Use the browser’s window.postMessage API to send messages between components (especially useful if components are isolated in iframes or separate contexts).

Pros:

• Decoupled Communication: Does not require direct component interaction.
• Cross-Context Communication: Ideal for isolated environments (like iframes).
• Native API: No additional libraries needed.

Cons:

• Security Considerations: Must carefully manage message origin and content.
• Boilerplate Code: Requires extra code for setting up and handling messages.
• Less Type Safety: Data passed is typically unstructured, so it might need extra validation.

5. Framework-Specific Bridges / Wrappers

How it works:

• Use integration tools to bridge frameworks, such as Angular Elements (to expose Angular components as web components) or React wrappers for web components.
• These bridges often provide mechanisms for property binding, event listening, and lifecycle management across frameworks.

Pros:

• Native Integration: Leverages the strengths of each framework.
• Improved Developer Experience: Framework-specific tooling can simplify complex integrations.
• Enhanced Consistency: Helps in maintaining consistent behavior across components.

Cons:

• Additional Abstraction: Wrappers add a layer of complexity.
• Maintenance Overhead: Updates in one framework might require corresponding updates in the bridge.
• Limited to Specific Use-Cases: Not as flexible for general cross-framework communication compared to more generic solutions.

Conclusion

The choice of communication mechanism depends on your application’s needs:

• For lightweight, decoupled events: Custom events and window messaging work well.
• For more complex state synchronization: A shared global state or pub/sub event bus might be more appropriate.
• For framework-specific cases: Consider using integration bridges to ease the interoperation between Angular, React, and web components.

By evaluating the trade-offs outlined above, you can select the most appropriate approach (or combination of approaches) for your micro frontend architecture.

Your Turn!

👉 Was this article helpful for you?

👉 Are you already using it in your project?

👉 Drop your experience or questions in the comment section below — I’d love to discuss them with you.

💬I would love to hear how you are using it or if you have any doubts I can clear.

🔁 If you found this helpful, please share this article with your dev circles!

📲 Follow me for more Angular deep-dives, code tips, and modern frontend strategies:

• 🔗 LinkedIn
• 🎥 Threads
• 🐦 Twitter Or X
• 👥 BlueSky
• 🖥️ GitHub/Tech
• 🌐 Website
• 📚 Blog/Medium

Cheers to cleaner, better code!!!

And, if you found this article helpful, a clap 👏 and a follow would be much appreciated 😊😊

Stay tuned for more Angular tips, tricks, and real-world guides! 🚀