The DRI Effect: Solving for user problems in low latency
When we founded Sybill, our engineering team was just a handful of people wearing multiple hats. As we've grown to 15 engineers, I've become increasingly convinced that how we structure our team impacts not just our internal operations, but directly shapes the experience of the sales professionals who use our product every day.
I want to share our approach to building and organizing our engineering team, which creates a rare win-win — better outcomes for our users and a more fulfilling environment for our engineers.
Beyond Traditional Engineering Structures
In my conversations with other CTOs, I discovered that many companies organize engineering teams into specialized functional groups or product-aligned pods. While these models have their merits, I was concerned they might create handoff friction and distance engineers from the real-world impact of their work.
We needed a structure that would:
The solution we landed on combines two powerful concepts: the Directly Responsible Individual (DRI) model pioneered by Steve Jobs at Apple, and a relentless focus on hiring high-agency engineers.
The Directly Responsible Individual (DRI) Model: Clear Ownership Drives Results
In our version of the DRI model:
For users, this creates a direct line between their needs and the people who can address them. Feedback doesn't get lost in translation or diluted through layers of management.
For engineers, it creates meaningful ownership and the ability to see their work through from concept to impact. They're not just implementing specifications; they're solving real problems for real people.
High-Agency Engineering: Thinking Like Founders
In parallel with implementing the DRI model, we noticed something interesting in our hiring: we began attracting engineers who had previously been founders or early employees at startups. These engineers shared a common trait: high agency. They didn't just write code; they identified problems, proposed solutions, and took initiative to implement them.
This combination of high-agency engineers and the DRI model created a powerful dynamic.
Real Examples, Real Impact
Let me share two examples that illustrate this approach in action:
Example 1: From 20 Minutes to 2 Minutes
The problem: Sales reps reported that post-call summaries were taking up to 20 minutes to generate — frustrating when you're rushing between meetings and need insights quickly.
The DRI approach: Instead of creating a ticket that would bounce between teams, Abhishek, one of our founding engineers, took complete ownership. After hearing about the orchestration platform Temporal during our design hours, he volunteered to explore it further.
Without being explicitly assigned or managed, he:
The result: Summary generation time dropped from 20 minutes to under 2 minutes.
For users: A dramatic improvement in a critical workflow that directly impacts productivity.
For Abhishek: The satisfaction of owning a significant technical challenge and seeing its direct impact on users.
Example 2: Eliminating UI Regressions
The problem: As a side effect of releasing changes almost daily, we were ending up with occasional UI glitches that were sometimes unrelated regressions.
The DRI approach: Daniele, one of our rockstar frontend engineers, took ownership of this pain point. Rather than waiting for a formal quality initiative, he investigated Playwright-based visual testing, built a proof of concept, and implemented it across our codebase.
The result: A 90% reduction in visual defects reaching production.
For users: More reliable demos and a more professional experience when showcasing the product.
For Daniele: The opportunity to solve a meaningful problem end-to-end and positively impact the user experience.
The Engineering Environment This Creates
This approach has created an engineering environment with several distinctive characteristics:
For engineers who thrive on ownership, impact, and technical challenges, this creates an unusually fulfilling environment. As one team member recently put it: "I've never worked somewhere where the path from identifying a problem to implementing a solution was so direct."
Measurable Results for Everyone
The impact of this approach is evident in metrics that matter to both users and engineers:
Balancing Responsibility and Freedom
This model isn't without challenges. The freedom to innovate must be balanced with the responsibility to deliver on commitments. We maintain this balance through:
Each quarter, as we review our progress, it’s impressive how our structure has allowed us to move swiftly while upholding quality. More importantly, it has fostered an environment where talented individuals can perform their best work to address real problems.
If you find that the core value of “Founder's Mentality” resonates with you, keep an eye out for an upcoming article discussing our other core values!
If you're a sales professional who would benefit from a tool built with this level of care and responsiveness, try Sybill today for Free at www.sybill.ai; or if you are a high-agency engineer who wants to have direct impact on real user problems, I'd love to connect. Visit sybill.ai/careers to learn more about joining our team.
Head of Product @ Parallel Systems || Product | Programs | Systems | Robotics | Autonomous Systems | Applied AI
3moVery nice. You should repost to https://www.linkedin.com/groups/2213786
Co-founder, Growth at Sybill | Building an EA for every AE
3moI love the post and the animated images are so on point!!
Co-founder@Sybill | Do less, close more.
3moHaving a Directly Responsible Individual is so important for every project and it cannot be the CTO and Head of Engineering, that creates layers and comm overload. Love the article!
Action Driven! Mentoring, encouraging, #4 trusted Sales Engineer|Solutions Engineer.Using AI to empower successful data-driven decisions
3moYou seem to repeat something twice there... I agree 100% who you bring on and how they interact with each other is very important