E-learning: Is that how YOU learn?

E-learning: Is that how YOU learn?

This post originally appeared in TrainingZone, January 2016

It seems to be the perennial challenge for L&D leaders: how do you get your employees to want to engage with e-learning? It’s comparatively easy to get employees to complete online compliance training - you just threaten them. But for building the capability of knowledge workers, I still think e-learning is yet to deliver on its promise.

We’ve tried everything we can think of, from whizzy animations, ‘real-life’ scenarios, game-design, leaderboards, and interactivity. There are an abundance of tactics aimed at grabbing and holding the attention of employees long enough to make a difference but despite these, (and at the admission of its providers) e-learning notoriously ‘struggles to retain, engage and motivate learners’ to an extent that could really impact upon an organisation’s people development goals.

I see this time and again. But rather than asking: ‘what new fangled ways can we now try to gain take-up of our company e-learning?’, perhaps we can ask a different question, one that gets to the heart of the problem…

Is that how YOU learn?

I've been asking this question to L&D professionals for quite some time and have yet to experience positive acknowledgement that those who source or create e-learning actually learn this way themselves. I've only once had a challenge to this question and was subsequently told that whilst he didn't develop himself with e-learning, it just wasn't his preferred learning style!

It’s now widely recognised that more than 70% of employees will go to web-search as a first port-of-call to learn what they need for their jobs - and I’m willing to bet that they’re not searching for an e-learning course.

For me, there is a clear distinction between ‘e-learning’ and ‘learning online’. We might learn online when we use web-search to find answers, definitions, or in-depth information on a given topic that helps us to do our job. When we engage in online forums, seek credible ‘experts’, search YouTube for ‘how-tos’, TED talks for inspiration, etc., so that within a relatively short amount of time, we can equip ourselves with the information or know-how we seek. And just to be ultra-clear, what I mean by e-learning can be understood when reading most people’s faces when you ask the question: “What do you think of your company’s e-learning?”

According to Towards Maturity’s latest benchmarking report, employees do want to learn online and the top 3 reasons they are motivated to do so are:

  • To do their job faster and better
  • For personal development
  • To increase their productivity

Whilst only 10% want to compete against colleagues for a high score.

So, despite notoriously low-engagement, how come e-learning is still bought and served as the default technology solution in so many organisations?

We all know the rationale: classroom training is condensed online thus extending the reach of L&D, saving money, and ensuring a consistent experience for all - whilst reporting on ‘completion’ (or not). But I wonder whether L&D’s persistence with e-learning has more to do with the IKEA effect - this being the ‘cognitive bias in which consumers place a disproportionately high value on products they partially created’?

For one moment though, let’s think about what we could achieve if people wanted to engage with the organisation’s online learning offering? As a strategic L&D leader, I’m interested in higher-performance, increased productivity, building internal capability, and improving the prospects of employees. All of which can only be done with engaged learners who will lead their own development inside an organisation’s learning systems rather than go straight to web-search when they want to learn.

So rather than thinking: which subjects can we drop into e-learning? Perhaps we can find out how to best appeal to employees with online learning that engages them on their own terms? If we did this, I’m not sure we’d be serving e-learning at all. I may be wrong!? To check this, however, take a look at how you actually learn online today - not how you think you should but how you actually do - and then ask peers, friends and colleagues. This could provide you with some valuable insights into how employees for want to learn, too.

It’s time now to choose the learning technology that truly supports the people development goals within our organisations.

Please let me know with your comments.

David James is Learning Strategist with Looop and a seasoned Talent Management, Learning & OD leader with more than 15 years of experience in the field. Until recently, David was Director of Talent, Learning & OD for The Walt Disney Company’s EMEA region. 

Danielle Grant MA PCC

Helping aspiring C-suite leaders globally, to be their best selves for healthy, happy, sustainable organisations. Leadership Development Expert, Speaker, Podcaster, Author. Change is my chocolate!

9y

The trick has to be to offer a blended learning experience that is not just e-learning as even with lots of whistles and bells there is a risk it can come across as patronising; but to offer something that is more akin to how david describes self motivated online learning. I tend to work with more senior executives and work-based learning principles, so the design approach is to offer the sort of range of learning i would choose myself and ask for work-related reflections to make it all relevant and real. So You tube videos, TED or RSA shorts, articles, pictures, links to related content from authoritative external sources are all crucial and can be tweaked in response to feedback. Combining this with social learning to offer the emotional engagement through either in person or virtual cohort sessions provides an environment for greater engagement and embedded learning ...

Andy Houghton

Founder: Videos That Explain... What You Need to Know

9y

One of the ways we do things is to point out that things like information security are just as important in our personal lives as they are at work - you're probably more likely to be caught by a phishing scam at home than you are at work, and if you do, you'll be the one having to sort it out, not the IT department. Hopefully, good habits will be good habits at home and at work. We see elearning as only one tool in the toolbox. You pick the best tool you have for the job you have to do, and in many cases you'll use a lot of different tools. I know I've learnt masses from Lynda.com, and from explainers like the ones by Common Craft, I often turn to YouTube to find out how to: fold a dinghy, collapse and pack a backdrop screen, cast a fly and add 'sidechain compression' to track, or use a piece of software. I sometimes read things. I never buy traditional elearning courses. One thing which I think could change a lot of elearning is if the people who write, build, promote and serve it up, were to use it to learn something, for their own purposes, then I think the conversations and understanding of what it can and can't do would be very different. A couple of blogs: Should elearning be like going to the dentists? http://whatyouneedtoknow.co.uk/should-elearning-be-like-going-to-the-dentist/ What have microwaves got to do with elearning? http://whatyouneedtoknow.co.uk/what-on-earth-have-microwaves-got-to-do-with-elearning/

Shankar Vijayan

Chief People Officer. CHRM/CPD

9y

Excellent article. I believe e-learning can be tailor made for each and every positions requirements. For example a cashier in a company what training's can be assigned which assists in their self development. Once it is done per position and their development requirement,every employee gets motivated to get trained and increase their productivity.

Samie Al-Achrafi

ᴘɪᴏɴᴇᴇʀ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏɴꜱᴄɪᴏᴜꜱ ʟᴇᴀᴅᴇʀꜱʜɪᴘ ᴍᴏᴠᴇᴍᴇɴᴛ | ꜱᴘᴇᴀᴋᴇʀ | ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ ᴏꜰ 9 ᴀɴᴅ #ᴛɪᴍᴇ4ʜᴜᴍᴀɴɪᴛʏ

9y

Excellent post, David. As you say, e-learning has delivered on the mandatory compliance/ annal refresher training front, but not on their other promises.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics