🧵 The Evolution of CSS: From Raw Stylesheets to Component Libraries (1996 → 2025)

🧵 The Evolution of CSS: From Raw Stylesheets to Component Libraries (1996 → 2025)


In 1996, styling a webpage meant writing raw CSS — every rule, color, and spacing line by line.

Fast forward to 2025: most developers no longer write raw CSS at all.

How did we get here? Let’s walk through the journey of CSS — and why modern web styling looks nothing like it did when it started.


🏁 1996 – The Birth of CSS

As the internet grew, designers needed control over layout and appearance. CSS was introduced to separate structure (HTML) from style.

It brought new power:

  • Color, font, and layout control
  • Centralized stylesheets
  • Media queries

But it also came with challenges:

  • No variables
  • No logic
  • Global scope made things messy at scale


🔧 2006 – The Preprocessor Era (Sass, LESS)

To improve scalability, tools like Sass and LESS added features native CSS lacked:

  • Variables
  • Nesting
  • Mixins
  • Functions

Projects became more maintainable. Teams could follow DRY principles. But styles were still global, and sharing styles across components wasn’t straightforward.

These preprocessors dominated for nearly a decade — and many large codebases still use them today.


🧱 2011 – The Framework Explosion (Bootstrap & Beyond)

Next came Bootstrap, the first CSS framework to achieve mass adoption.

It provided:

  • A consistent design system
  • Responsive grid
  • Prebuilt components (buttons, cards, navs)

You styled with classes like btn btn-primary, and your UI just… worked.

Soon, other frameworks followed:

  • Foundation
  • Bulma
  • UIkit

The appeal? Speed and structure. The drawback? Customizing deeply was hard. And many sites started to look the same.


💡 2015 – Component-Based UIs & CSS-in-JS

With the rise of frameworks like React, styling began to shift toward components.

This led to:

  • Scoped styles
  • Inline styles with props
  • Libraries like styled-components, Emotion, JSS

CSS-in-JS solved some big problems:

✅ No global conflicts

✅ Dynamic styling via logic

✅ Scoped by default

But it also introduced:

❌ Performance tradeoffs

❌ Unfamiliar syntax for some developers

❌ Heavier tooling requirements

Still, it laid the groundwork for component-driven design systems.


⚡ 2017 – Utility-First CSS: Tailwind Changes the Game

Then came a radical new idea: stop writing custom CSS at all.

Tailwind CSS introduced utility-first classes like:

<div class="bg-white p-4 rounded-lg shadow-md">...</div>        

Benefits:

✅ No naming conflicts

✅ Design tokens directly in HTML

✅ Rapid development with constraints

It flipped traditional thinking — from semantic class names to functional utilities.


🧩 2020s – Tailwind Ecosystem Matures: Enter DaisyUI

As Tailwind adoption grew, developers wanted more component-level convenience.

DaisyUI became the leading plugin for Tailwind — adding pre-built, styled components with semantic class names:

<button class="btn btn-primary">Click</button>        

✅ Fully themeable

✅ Mobile-friendly

✅ Works with Tailwind’s utility model

✅ Perfect for prototyping or production


🧱 2021–2025 – Component Libraries Take Over

While utility-first CSS soared, so did demand for full UI kits — especially in component-based apps.

Leading libraries emerged:

  • MUI (Material UI): Google’s Material Design system, with ready-made components
  • Chakra UI: Themeable, accessible, and fully React-first
  • Ant Design: Enterprise-ready components, widely used in admin dashboards
  • shadcn/ui: A modern, headless component system built on top of Tailwind, embracing flexibility and accessibility

These libraries struck a balance between design systems and dev experience — giving developers the tools to build scalable UIs without starting from scratch.


📅 2025 – The Modern CSS Landscape

Here’s what most teams are using today:

Approach What It Solves Popular Tools Native CSS Base-level styling Rarely used standalone Preprocessors Reusability, DRY logic Sass, LESS Frameworks Design systems & grids Bootstrap, Foundation Utility-First Speed, constraint-based styling Tailwind CSS Tailwind Plugins UI components + themes DaisyUI Component Libraries Fully styled, reusable UI elements MUI, shadcn/ui, Chakra UI


🧠 Final Thoughts

CSS hasn’t disappeared. It evolved — into an ecosystem of tools that abstract its complexity and increase its power.

In 1996, you styled everything manually. In 2025, you build interfaces with powerful frameworks, plugins, and component libraries — and rarely touch raw CSS at all.

The future of styling is fast, scalable, accessible, and component-driven.


What styling tools are you using in 2025? Let’s reflect — and share the journey.

#CSS #TailwindCSS #DaisyUI #MUI #shadcnui #WebDevelopment #UIDesign #Frontend #FrontendEngineering #DesignSystems #ComponentDrivenDevelopment #Bootstrap #Sass #CSSinJS #ModernCSS

Robert Kocharyan

Web Developer @UPC | React | TypeScript | JavaScript | Node.js | Express.js | API Development (RESTful & GraphQL) | GitHub | Git

3mo

CSS has changed a lot. Now it’s easier and faster to build cool websites with tools like Tailwind and MUI.

Davit Gasparyan

Senior Frontend Developer @TechWings | React, TypeScript, JavaScript, NextJS, React Native | Led Frontend Migrations, Boosting Performance & Scalability

3mo

Such a cool breakdown of how far CSS has come! From raw styles to full component libraries, wild to see it all mapped out like this

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics