The Evolving Landscape of AI and Cybersecurity
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming businesses and society in profound ways. As companies rush to adopt AI to gain competitive advantage, we must also consider the impacts on cybersecurity. In this post, I will summarize key insights from a conference on AI and cybersecurity, organized by CESIN during its Eleventh Congress in Reims, France (a must-attend).
The speaker, Francoise Soulie-Fogelman , has extensive experience in AI and leads an industry group exploring its cybersecurity implications. She provides a historical overview of AI waves since the 1980s and explains why generative AI marks a seismic shift today. Francoise Soulie-Fogelman then examines AI's expanding attack surface, new threats, and countermeasures organizations can take.
The AI Landscape: Waves and Generations
AI has experienced successive "winters" and hype cycles over the past few decades. Francoise Soulie-Fogelman outlines two main approaches:
Symbolic AI: Tried fully encoding human knowledge and reasoning in expert system rules. This failed to match human capabilities.
Data-driven AI: Focuses on using data to accomplish tasks without explicit programming. More successful recently.
Key waves:
1980s-90s: Neural networks and machine learning developed but not yet practical
2012: AlexNet convincingly beat other techniques on image recognition, catalyzing deep learning
2012-2022: Widespread deployment of deep learning for perception tasks like image, speech, and language
Late 2022: Generative AI arrives with systems like ChatGPT that can create novel content
Generative AI represents a seismic shift, with its ability to produce high-fidelity synthetic text, images, audio, and video. Adoption has skyrocketed exponentially faster than any prior technology. While exciting, it also expands the attack surface for bad actors.
"So AI is not going to replace the cyber team. If you think you're going on vacation, you're wrong. So no, it's not over, it's not, it continues. I'm not saying it continues the same way. I'm saying it continues with a lot more." - Francoise Soulie-Fogelman
Expanding Attack Surface with AI Growth
As companies rush to deploy AI before fully securing it, risks grow. Reasons include:
More data and modalities: AI systems ingest diverse, multimodal data types. More inputs mean more potential vulnerabilities.
Sheer scale: AI adoption is surging, exposing far more systems. Each one is a potential target.
Constant evolution: Attackers and systems change rapidly. AI must continually adapt through learning.
Lack of expertise: Most developers using AI toolkits lack cybersecurity knowledge. They wrongly assume the tools are secure by default.
This situation requires urgent attention to secure AI proactively rather than reactively. Next, we will explore key threats and countermeasures.
Emerging Threats and Countermeasures
Attackers are actively probing for ways to exploit AI, while defenders are just waking up to the risks. Known threat categories include:
Data poisoning: Manipulating training data to degrade AI system performance.
Model poisoning: Altering model parameters and logic to sabotage functionality.
Evasion: Tricking deployed models with manipulated inputs.
Extraction: Stealing confidential data or intellectual property within models.
Attack techniques will become more sophisticated over time as bad actors upskill.
However, organizations can take steps to defend their AI:
Monitor the expanding threat landscape and update defenses continuously.
Follow secure development best practices for the AI lifecycle.
Limit data access to reduce the attack surface.
Use multiple diverse defense tools and techniques.
Validate inputs thoroughly before feeding them into models.
Detect anomalies indicating potential attacks.
Control model autonomy instead of fully automating.
Build human oversight into deployment workflows.
No single solution will fully protect against AI threats. Ongoing Vigilance coupled with layered security is essential.
Generative AI Multiplies Risks
Generative AI warrants special concern given its rapid emergence. While limited today, its trajectory suggests wide-ranging risks including:
Synthetic media for convincing phishing and fraud
Impersonation of individuals via generated imagery and audio
Automated mass production of tailored social engineering attacks
Sophisticated bot-driven influence operations
Counterfeit content undermining trust in institutions
Difficulty differentiating what is real versus AI-fabricated
These threats make comprehensive defense even more challenging. Promising tools like media forensics and watermarking are still developing.
Opportunities to Use AI for Enhanced Defense
While AI increases risks, it also provides opportunities to strengthen cybersecurity. Potential benefits include:
Automating repetitive manual processes for greater speed and scale.
Detecting known threats early based on pattern recognition.
Analyzing enormous volumes of threat data is not easily manageable by humans.
Adaptively learning to detect novel anomalies and zero-day exploits.
Generating synthetic datasets to augment training and testing.
Providing predictive risk scoring to focus analyst attention.
Orchestrating automated response playbooks to counter detected threats.
Recommending remedial actions similar to past incidents.
These capabilities significantly expand the cybersecurity toolkit. However, AI cannot fully replace human judgment and oversight.
Recommendations for Organizations
Here are recommended focus areas for organizations seeking to improve their AI security posture:
Assign clear leadership responsibility for AI cyber risks.
Conduct an audit identifying current AI assets, data, and risks.
Build awareness and skills through education and training.
Develop policies and procedures governing AI utilization.
Perform ongoing threat assessments and penetration testing.
Institute secure design reviews within development workflows.
Implement controls limiting data access to the least privilege needed.
Continuously monitor systems and review logs for anomalies.
Simulate realistic attacks to evaluate and improve defenses.
Maintain comprehensive fallback plans in case defenses fail.
The Bottom Line
AI delivers tremendous value but also expands the cybersecurity challenge. By following prudent security practices, organizations can confidently pursue AI adoption while managing risks. Those ignoring AI threats or taking an overconfident “wait and see” attitude court disaster.
What steps is your organization taking to address AI cyber risks? What challenges do you face? I welcome your perspectives and recommendations in the comments.
Cyber Security Leader & Eternal Student : Strategist | Architect | Consultant | Creative Problem Solver | Auditor | Advisor | Risk Assessor | Team Builder | Coach | Mentor | Writer | Trainer | Cyber-Psychologist
1yVery good and an eye opener article, from my perspective, AI will have to pass through lot of friction and restrain with data privacy and compliance regulations, because AI is heavily depended upon the available data (including personal and confidential) around the digital ecosystem and that same data is controlled/protected/secured through lot of regulatory bodies and organizations, so its contradictory, without free and easily accessible available data AI and ML both are non-functional, and efficient, and the friction , restrain is challenge to cybersecurity professionals going forward. Would appreciate feedback and opinion if my perspective is incorrect or non-factual.
Passionately Fueling the Growth of Sales Pros
1yGreat post
Cyril Simonnet thanks for your very detailed synthesis ! Way more than what I presented at CESIN. And thanks to the organizers to have given me the opportunity to attend this conference.
Founder | Shiv Software Experts | Driving Innovation in Software Solutions & IT Consulting | Technology Strategist
1yFascinating insights on AI and Cybersecurity! The double-edged nature of AI calls for proactive security measures in this evolving landscape.