The Exit Obsession That's Killing African Innovation
Hey, don't shoot the messenger, exits are important! They are proof that business models work, that markets exist, and that value can be created and captured.
But let's face reality: exits don't have to be unicorn exits.
Over the last few months, I have sat in rooms full of African founders and investors alike, and the same question dominated every conversation: "When will we see our next unicorn exit?"
Wrong question.
While we're obsessing over billion-dollar valuations and Silicon Valley metrics, we're missing the real indicators of a thriving ecosystem. And this obsession might actually be stunting our growth.
In my recent conversation with Dr. Houda Ghozzi, PhD , founder of Open Startup , she shared a perspective that challenges everything about how we've been measuring success:
"The continent is a child doing the first steps. How do you validate your kid? You validate your kid when they start walking better and then when they start running slowly."
This metaphor hit hard because it exposes our fundamental misunderstanding of where Africa's innovation journey actually is.
We're Measuring Success All Wrong
I've watched promising startups pivot away from sustainable, profitable models toward venture-scale moonshots because that's what gets attention. I've seen founders burn out chasing metrics that don't match their market reality.
Meanwhile, quietly in the background, hundreds of African entrepreneurs are building solid businesses, creating jobs, solving real problems, and generating actual revenue.
But we don't celebrate them. We don't study them. We barely acknowledge them.
Houda put it perfectly:
"I don't need an exit to have validation. The validation is when you start to see big numbers of people who want to try and more and more initiatives that start to generate revenues and that try to structure and start to grow."
Look at How Real Ecosystems Actually Grow
Consider Silicon Valley's evolution. Before Google and Facebook, there were dozens of smaller, profitable tech companies that created the talent pool, investor confidence, and operational knowledge needed for larger successes.
Or look at Israel's ecosystem: it wasn't built on unicorn dreams but on consistent $50m-$200m exits that created experienced entrepreneurs, angel investors, and a culture of innovation.
Even closer to home, we're seeing this pattern emerge. Nigeria's ecosystem didn't start with Interswitch's billion-dollar valuation - it was built on years of smaller fintech successes, payment innovations, and incremental wins that created the foundation.
Kenya's story follows a similar path: from mobile money innovations to gradual e-commerce growth, then larger financial services plays.
The Real Success Metrics We Should Track
Instead of counting unicorns, what if we measured:
These metrics tell the story of an ecosystem learning to walk before it runs.
The Patience Problem
Here's what frustrates me most about these founder and investor conversations: the impatience. Everyone wants overnight transformation in markets where basic infrastructure is still being built. To be honest, I don't blame them. I am impatient too because I want the world to see the greatness inherent in our continent!
But Dr. Ghozzi's perspective reframes this: "If we start saying that validation is just exits... be patient. The continent is a child doing the first steps."
This isn't about lowering standards. It's about having appropriate expectations that match our context.
What This Means for You
If you're building in Africa:
If you're investing in Africa:
The beautiful irony? When we stop chasing exits and start building sustainable businesses, the exits often follow naturally.
Your Reality Check
The next time you think about Africa's "unicorn problem," flip the script and ask yourself: "How many profitable, growing, job-creating businesses is our ecosystem producing right now?"
How many founders are on their second or third venture? How many startup employees have become angel investors? How many regulatory improvements happened because entrepreneurs and investors pushed for change?
Count those numbers. That's your real ecosystem health score - and it predicts sustainable success better than any unicorn chase ever will.
Senior Investment Analyst | Dream VC Fellow | Financial Modelling | Eternal Lover of Banana Bread
3moLove the metaphor. you’re spot on that exits don’t need to be unicorn-level to prove the ecosystem’s worth. That said, the VC timeline still feels misaligned with these “walking before running” founders, so where’s the real patient capital coming from? Maybe we start creating blended vehicles that pair smaller LPs with longer return horizons and local operators who understand the terrain. If we match realistic metrics to realistic capital, the innovation curve could finally accelerate.
Strategy advisor to funds, FoF, firms, companies, clusters and governments. Run global VC accelerator programs. Develop VC ecosystems. Invest in energy tech companies from pre-seed to IPO. Chair, Link Capital.
3mo2/2 ... so instead of saying exits are hard and emerging ecosystems are hard; let's shift the conversation to 'how to we create liquidity events and exits that are fit for the ecosystem'. Looking at the MENA region today, exit maturity is booming everywhere. Angel networks, VC funds, fund-of-funds and founders. From secondaries, partials and IPO, that ecosystem has just grown into its place in recent years. Hope to see the same development for Africa. Saying "exits are hard and exits don't happen" will only kill of LP interest and make it even harder to raise capital in the region. Happy to chat. (and looking forward to seeing amazing exit & liquidity management at Launch Africa Ventures!)
Strategy advisor to funds, FoF, firms, companies, clusters and governments. Run global VC accelerator programs. Develop VC ecosystems. Invest in energy tech companies from pre-seed to IPO. Chair, Link Capital.
3moUwem U., good post, key discussion. Just not sure I 100% agree with your key conclusion. Given your extensive experience and reach, I would encourage a discussion on 'what is actually this thing we call ''exit'?" Many founders, globally, have a flawed understanding of an exit as "the end" of my startup. Nothing could be further from the truth. For most, an 'exit or liquidity event' is just one more small step on a very long and challenging journey. Most of the time, even with an 'exit or liquidity event', founders, management and key people (most employees) stay with the company through the minor or major changes in ownership structure. Taking a company public: shifting from owning the company privately to becoming a publicly traded company. An exit, but nobody is really leaving. Doing a strategic M&A transaction (more common): the buyers pay a premium and will often lock in founders, management and staff to stay on for the long-term. Again, more often than not, team stays, investors leave. Doing a partial secondary: well, a few early investors can sell. Early employees can sell partial (see, Moniepoint; https://techcabal.com/2025/06/04/moniepoint-unicorn-round-made-employee-billions/ 1/2
Collaboration Facilitator and Impact Enthusiast
3mo100% aligned with you, Houda Ghozzi, PhD! Success doesn’t have to look the same everywhere. The continent is well-positioned to define what startup ecosystem success means on its own terms: aligned with its unique needs and context.
CEO & Founder, Asoba | Compute for Climate Fellow
3moWhy can't the exit simply be stock buyback?