The Fear Factor: Why Psychological Safety Unlocks High Performance
Ever been in a meeting where you had an idea—maybe even a great one—but decided to keep it to yourself? Maybe you weren’t sure how people would react. Maybe you didn’t want to risk looking foolish. Or maybe you’d spoken up before, only to be ignored, dismissed, or subtly shut down.
Now, imagine that happening across an entire organization.
How many innovative ideas never get shared? How many mistakes go uncorrected because no one wants to admit them? How many potential breakthroughs never happen—not because people lack talent or ambition, but because they don’t feel safe enough to take the risk?
That’s the hidden cost of low psychological safety, and it’s one of the biggest barriers to high performance that most leaders don’t even realize they’re creating.
Psychological safety isn’t just about “being nice” at work. It’s not about avoiding discomfort or making sure no one ever feels challenged. It’s about something far more powerful: ensuring that people feel safe to speak up, take risks, admit mistakes, and challenge ideas—without fear of punishment or embarrassment.
Without it [psychological safety], teams stagnate. Innovation dies. And the best people disengage.
Why Psychological Safety is the Foundation of High Performance
Harvard researcher Amy Edmondson’s studies of high-performing teams revealed something counterintuitive: The best teams weren’t the ones with the most experience or the highest IQs. They were the ones where people felt safe to contribute openly, challenge each other, and admit when they didn’t know something.
When psychological safety is present, people:
But when psychological safety is missing?
And here’s the kicker—this isn’t just about feelings. It’s about performance.
When people don’t feel safe to take risks, they default to not making mistakes instead of doing their best work. And those are not the same thing.
How Leaders (Maybe Unintentionally) Kill Psychological Safety
Most leaders think they’re fostering a psychologically safe environment. They say things like, “My door is always open!” or “You can always come to me with concerns!” But then… their actions say something completely different.
Here are three common ways leaders destroy psychological safety:
1. Punishing failure instead of learning from it.
If people know they’ll be blamed for making a mistake, they’ll do everything in their power to hide mistakes instead of fixing them. In a psychologically safe culture, failure isn’t ignored—it’s used as a tool for learning and improvement.
2. Dismissing feedback instead of encouraging it.
Ever had a leader say they “welcome feedback” but then get defensive the second someone speaks up? If employees see that honesty leads to pushback—or worse, retaliation—they stop giving real feedback.
3. Micromanaging instead of trusting.
When leaders hover over every decision, second-guess their team’s choices, or insist on controlling the smallest details, they send a clear message: I don’t trust you. And if people feel like their judgment isn’t valued, they’ll stop making independent decisions.
Building Psychological Safety—The Right Way
So, how do you create a space where people feel safe to contribute but challenged to grow?
One of the best ways is by strengthening Psychological Capital (PsyCap)—a model that helps build confidence and resilience in teams. PsyCap is made up of four key elements:
When leaders build these elements in their teams, they create the conditions for trust, risk-taking, and innovation.
And it doesn’t take grand gestures. Small, consistent actions—like admitting when you don’t know something, owning up to mistakes, and encouraging real feedback—can shift the culture in a massive way.
The One Move That Creates Psychological Safety Instantly
Here’s something simple you can do today to create more psychological safety in your space—whether it’s at work, in your friendships, or even at home.
👉 When someone shares an idea, instead of reacting immediately, pause and say: “Tell me more about that.”
Why? Because when people share ideas, they’re testing whether it’s safe to contribute. If they get shut down—or worse, ignored—they learn it’s not safe. They stop engaging. But when you say, “Tell me more about that,” you’re signaling that you’re open. That their voice matters. That their contribution is valued—even if it’s not perfect.
And when you do that consistently? You create an environment where people not only have permission to speak up—they want to.
Final Thought: Is Your Team Safe Enough to Succeed?
Take a second to reflect:
The best teams, the best workplaces, the best relationships—they aren’t the ones with the fewest mistakes. They’re the ones where mistakes get caught early. Where ideas get challenged in a way that leads to better outcomes. Where people aren’t afraid to contribute.
So, whether you’re leading a team, working on a project, or just trying to be a better collaborator—ask yourself:
"Am I creating an environment where people want to bring their best?"
And if you’re wondering how to take this even further—how to make psychological safety a built-in part of your team or organization? Well…we’ve got a lot more to talk about.
Watch the full episode here: https://youtu.be/71wqnhXGUok
✅️ I will convert customer experiences into 5 star reviews for your company ✨️ Community builder ✨️ Empathetic team lead, forever curious as I heal the world one person at a time ✅️ 🐈 🙅♀️
5moThanks for sharing this.
Corporate Speaking Strategist, Consultant, Coach & Event Architect. I build strategies and success stories that motivate and move markets. Strategic solutions for organizations who want inspiration, motivation & impact.
5mo"Micromanaging instead of trusting." I mentioned this in another article I read this week. You have a challenging time with growth in your career when you aren't trusted.
Strategic Transformation | I Help CEOs Achieve Strategic Clarity, Align Teams & Execute Bold Change | Post-Merger Integration | Enterprise Execution | Ex-British Commando | +1 Handicap
5moBrilliant post, Liz — and spot on. It reminded me of a TED Talk by Dan Ariely on What Makes Us Feel Good About Our Work. Two of his experiments stuck with me & reinforce your point. In the first, participants built LEGO figures under three conditions: One group got a “Well done” and saw their work set aside. Another was ignored — work taken without a word. The third saw their work dismantled immediately. In another, participants did letter-matching tasks for decreasing pay: Acknowledged: "uh huh" Ignored: Not looked at & placed face down Shredded: Instantly destroyed. The outcome of ignoring and shredding - almost identical! Bad news: Ignoring work is nearly as damaging as destroying it. Good news: A simple nod or “uh-huh” can double motivation. In 1 role, I inherited a culture where mediocrity was unintentionally rewarded — clock 1,980 hours a year & you were promoted. Engagement was slipping. I changed that by co-designing a framework with the employees. Through workshops, they defined the standards, success measures, and metrics. Recognition and accountability weren’t just balanced — they were owned. As you said: high-performing teams don’t happen by accident. They’re built on clarity, fairness, and feedback — both ways.
Helping Leaders Coach for Retention, Productivity & Growth!
6moDr. Liz Wilson, CSIP™ “Tell me more..” is one of my all time favorites! Such an important topic.
Book promotion specialist | YouTube Marketing Expert | Best-selling book Strategist | Digital Marketing | Google Ads Campaign Expert
6moI recently went to your YouTube and watched the latest episode. Congratulations on the new episode, it's great Dr. Liz Wilson, CSIP™