Fixing the System That Can’t Fix Anything
This article was born not from theory, but from real-life observations. Repeated attempts to report or resolve simple matters, like requesting a repair from a service provider, have become a multi-week ordeal. What ought to take hours often stretches into weeks. A chain of emails, forms, disclaimers, and faceless handovers. Just as you think you’re making progress, the chain breaks: someone has left, the case is reassigned, and the process begins anew. And the problem? Still unresolved.
We are living in an age where we are so consumed by how things are done that we’ve forgotten why they’re done at all. Process has overtaken purpose. Compliance has overridden common sense. It’s a world where ticking boxes is rewarded more than solving problems and this, I believe, is making us collectively inefficient, disillusioned, and dangerously complacent.
I’ve watched this evolution unfold across industries: in property management, customer service, technology, healthcare and other. We’re building systems that are exquisitely documented, heavily regulated, yet tragically ineffective. It’s not that people don’t want to help, it’s that they can’t. They’ve been trained to follow procedure, not to think. They’re instructed to escalate, not to resolve.
We are becoming a society ruled by process not outcome.
The modern workplace is now defined by its rituals: endless meetings, Slack messages, dashboards, workflows, regulations, procedures, compliance trackers, and email chains. Communication has become the work itself. Success is no longer about impact or resolution, but about visibility, being seen to be working, not necessarily achieving anything.
We’ve become transactional, not task-oriented. Structured, yet stagnant. Everyone has partial knowledge, but no one owns the problem.
In this environment, those with actual authority to fix things have become rare. Often, they’re buried beneath layers of bureaucracy or have been outsourced to distant third parties. Decision-making is fragmented, dispersed and deferred.
What’s even more troubling is that this isn’t just frustrating it’s demoralising. It disempowers our most capable people. It conditions our young talent to become process administrators rather than problem-solvers. It drains initiative, rewards delay, and punishes independent thinking.
Some may say this is the cost of scale or the price of compliance. Others may argue that technology and regulation protect us from error or abuse. And while those aims are important, the pendulum has swung too far. We are no longer building systems that serve people we are building systems that serve systems.
And when something goes wrong, there’s no human at the other end of the line. No one with judgement, accountability, or discretion. Just a system that loops you back to the start or worse, to nowhere.
Where Do We Go From Here?
When it comes to providing a service, we must start by redefining what success looks like. Reward outcomes, not optics. Celebrate the people who solve problems not just those who report them. Flatten the structure. Eliminate layers that add friction without adding value. Empower those on the front line. Digitise with wisdom. Technology should simplify not entangle. Automation should enhance human judgement not eliminate it. Restore human discretion. Train your teams to think. To act. To own. Give them the tools and the trust to do so. Reintroduce purpose. Remind ourselves why the system exists in the first place not to enforce a process, but to deliver a result.
There is something profoundly human about problem-solving, about making things work, about helping someone swiftly and decisively. We need to bring that spirit back into the heart of our service organisations. This is not a nostalgic call for the past, nor a rejection of structure or technology. It is a plea for balance. For re-centring our systems around the people they are meant to serve. For valuing competence over compliance.
VP Sales Finance & Commercial Pricing
2moSpot on... i bet many of us can relate to your point about systems valuing process compliance over desired final outcomes; as we continue to see organisations where checking boxes replaces critical thinking and initiative. The real fix lies in restoring trust in people, empowering them to challenge norms, and to your point re-starting with the basic question: what is the objective? And why are we doing this?
CIO- direction système d'informations - Groupama Paris Val de Loire
2moThanks Jamil for this share In our relentless quest to optimize, automate, and standardize, We’ve created environments where the “how” dominates the “why” People follow checklists instead of outcomes. The result? Systems that are internally coherent but externally ineffective!! But now, how can we reverse the situation to shift back to outcome-driven thinking?
I help Series A & B tech founders secure funding with 2x probability and cut cash burn by 40% within 90 days using the Financial Reliability Framework™ | Financial Growth Strategist
3moJamil, thanks for sharing!
I help FMCG businesses achieve sustainable profitable growth.
3moI thought initially good service but it’s really effective service e.g. I have this situation & I need your help. Can you do it or will you try to avoid it? Old versus new approach. Great thought provoking article Jamil.
Chief Manager
3moI agree 100%