Fluids and Inotropes: Getting It “Just Right” in Critical Care
This week I was so happy to chair a CPD meeting with Medtalkz SA where Roger Dickerson presented an educational session on the use of fluids and inotropes in EM.
Here is a summary of the talk, the major learning points, and some reflections!
Hat tip to Prof Roger Dickerson for an awesome presentation and as always a positive learning experience!
In critical care, the toughest calls are rarely about whether to act...it’s about what to do, when, and how much.
Fluids and inotropes are at the centre of this challenge. Too often, we reach for these medications out of habit, tradition, or desperation, rather than with a clear, physiology-driven plan.
Let's get right into the info!
1. Rethinking Shock
Shock is circulatory failure with inadequate tissue oxygen delivery.
It isn’t just hypotension. Patients can be shocked while normotensive or even hypertensive.
The task isn’t to “chase the numbers” but to restore perfusion, balance oxygen supply, and support the failing system—whether it’s the pump (heart), the pipes (vasculature), or the fluid volume itself.
2. Inotropes: Not Just Last Resort
We’ve all heard colleagues mutter that “the patient is stable on inotropes.”
The truth is: a patient on inotropes is unstable by definition
Key takeaways:
Rule of thumb:
➡️ Start fast (titrate quickly to effect).
➡️ Wean slow (withdraw cautiously as stability returns).
And always correct reversible causes first—acidosis, hypovolemia, tamponade, PE, hypothermia. No inotrope can fix physiology we’re ignoring.
3. Fluids: Goldilocks Medicine
When it comes to fluids, we often live between a rock and a hard place:
Guiding principles:
And above all:
Use tools like point-of-care ultrasound to guide fluid responsiveness. Blood pressure alone is a poor guide.
4. Fluids in DKA: A Special Case
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is different. These patients often need large volumes fast, and the fluid you choose can either help or harm.
Bottom Line for DKA: Replace aggressively but wisely. Balanced crystalloids protect against worsening acidosis and give your insulin therapy the best chance to succeed.
5. The Leadership Lesson
This isn’t just pharmacology, it’s leadership at the bedside.
When the room is tense and the team is waiting, how we choose matters. Are we:
The Goldilocks approach—not too little, not too much, just right—is as much about culture as it is about physiology.
Bottom Line
💬 Your turn:
How does your team decide when to start an inotrope or what fluid to choose in DKA? Do you feel confident that everyone at the bedside understands the why—or are we still too often operating on habit?
CCEMT-P, FP-C, Educator, Empowering prehospital providers through advanced training, critical care, and flight medicine. Passionate about clinical excellence, leadership and unlocking full potential in EMS Let’s connect
4dKaleb Lachenicht this is excellent, however in the DKA section, I’d agree that fluid choice matters, but we need to keep it in perspective. The real acidosis in DKA is driven by ketones, not chloride. PlasmaLyte is definitely the fluid of choice, with LR as a solid second option. 0.9% NaCl can cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis if given in large volumes, but that’s a non–anion gap issue and doesn’t actually delay reversal of ketoacidosis once insulin is on board. The evidence backs this up: *SALT-ED & SMART (2018): Balanced crystalloids reduced hyperchloremia/AKI, but not DKA-specific. *Kuppermann et al., NEJM 2018 (peds DKA): No difference in time to resolution or neuro outcomes between saline and balanced fluids. *Meta-analyses (2021–23): Balanced fluids reduce hyperchloremia and normalize bicarb slightly faster, but no consistent impact on DKA resolution or hard outcomes. So yes, PlasmaLyte > LR > NaCl in theory. But NaCl has been used safely for decades. The big priorities remains, restore intravascular volume, monitor potassium, and stop ketone production with insulin. Curious to see what are people reaching for first in practice and what is your organization using?