Are Game Reviews Still Relevant in the YouTube Era?
The Shift: From Reading to Watching

Are Game Reviews Still Relevant in the YouTube Era?

In 2025, one question keeps bubbling up in gaming circles: Do written game reviews still matter? With YouTube creators dropping reaction videos, gameplay breakdowns, and hour-long critiques the moment an embargo lifts, it’s fair to ask if the classic review format—words, scores, and screenshots—has a place in modern gaming media.

The answer? Yes—but not in the way it used to.

The Shift: From Reading to Watching

Let’s be real. Most gamers would rather watch a charismatic YouTuber rant about a game than read a 1,500-word review. Why?

  • Visuals rule: You can see how the game plays, hear the sound design, and judge the vibes for yourself.

  • Personality matters: Creators inject humor, rage, or passion in a way that text rarely matches.

  • Community engagement: YouTube and Twitch come with comments, reactions, and a sense of belonging.

That’s powerful. And for many, it's enough. The video format delivers instant impressions, unfiltered opinions, and gameplay receipts in a few scrolls and clicks.

So Why Read at All?

Despite the shift, written reviews haven’t died. They’ve evolved. Here's what they still offer that video can’t always replicate:

1. Clarity Without the Noise

No 10-minute intros. No sponsored segments. Just the facts, the insights, and the argument. You get what the reviewer thinks, backed by structured reasoning—not just emotional outbursts.

2. Critical Depth

Text often goes deeper. Video needs to entertain to retain attention; writing has the space to break down systems, analyze design, and reference context. It's where the why behind a score lives.

3. Searchable, Quoted, Cited

Good written reviews still matter to aggregators like Metacritic, but also to future readers. You can quote them, cite them in debates, and reference them without scrubbing through a video to find the right line.

4. Low Bandwidth, High Utility

Reading is still easier in classrooms, on lunch breaks, or when your Wi-Fi’s crawling. A review that loads in seconds can still beat a high-def video that takes forever to buffer.

What’s Actually Happening?

Game reviews aren't disappearing—they're splitting into two paths:

  • YouTube and video reviews for the visceral, instant, emotional take.

  • Written reviews and essays for the thoughtful, structured, reflective perspective.

In a way, the YouTube era has actually raised the bar for written reviews. You can’t just describe a game anymore. You need a clear voice, strong analysis, and a perspective people can’t get anywhere else. And that’s a good thing.

The Future? Hybrid Wins

We’re already seeing it: game sites publishing written reviews with embedded video highlights. Creators doing longform essays with citations and timestamps. Podcasts with linked transcripts. The smartest reviewers adapt to the audience’s habits without watering down their depth.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics