🌏 How AI Will Unlock a New Era of Human Creativity
When I was 15, living amidst the cornfields of the rural Midwestern United States, I wrote an essay.
A local civic organization was holding a writing competition, and children from schools in my area were encouraged to participate. The topic?
“Freedom: Our Responsibility to Preserve.”
(Yes, for those of you outside the US, this was actually the topic.)
The sponsoring organization, called the Optimists Club, had chapters throughout the United States.
To my surprise, my essay won in our local chapter, then in our regional competition. Before I knew it, my parents received a phone call, informing them it was advancing to the national competition stage.
My essay, and I as a result, would represent the entire State of Illinois.
Strangely, an essay by a girl in this tiny rural town (population 2500) had beat out all the essays from bigger towns and cities throughout Illinois. Including the entire population of Chicago.
This was quite a big deal for me, and within my local community.
There was a banquet held in my honor, a cash prize, a plaque with my name on it. Articles in the local newspapers.
My parents, teachers, and people in my hometown were proud.
This also meant I had won an all-expenses-paid trip to the national convention, where I would meet fellow essay winners from the other 49 U.S. states. Wow!
We would be special guests for 4 days at the exotic location of… wait for it...
Valley Forge, Pennsylvania!
While not on everyone’s list of dream destinations, this was a place of significance in American history. We would attend special talks from experts at think tanks and government officials on a variety of topics.
And if this sounds like a big deal, consider this:
I had never been on an airplane before.
In other words, this was the nerd’s equivalent of winning a beauty pageant.
One of the speakers whose talk most interested me was a futurist.
He was a special advisor to the U.S. President.
I didn’t know people had jobs like that.
I am the daughter of a factory worker.
All around me, most people worked physical jobs, or were teachers.
I was awestruck that a person could be paid to think.
Let alone about the future, and let alone advise the President on it.
I listened closely, feeling extremely fortunate to hear from someone with such rare expertise.
Macintosh Computers had just begun to enter my school system at the time, with their fun apple logo that felt like a perfect fit for education.
He explained that eventually, as we used those computers more and more, and the information we shared became digitized, we would store it and share it in new ways.
Once digital information could be shared more easily, he explained, it would lead to an era in which humans could work from home at their keyboards, and instead of using phone calls to call each other, we could connect in digital spaces.
(The internet did not exist yet.)
He explained that computers would get so small they would be injected into our bloodstreams.
He told us that as computers got easier to access, people would work from home a lot more, until for many it would become the default.
Most of what he said seemed far-fetched to the average person in the 1990s.
Some of the other essay winners even scoffed at his ideas after he left.
I actually believed him, and his ideas remained etched in my brain.
But he also said that as people worked at home more...
As an introvert, I questioned this part of his view of the future.
Sitting at a computer all day, thinking and creating, sounded pretty amazing to me.
But what he said next made my young eyes light up with hope.
He talked about how after we got through a spike of computers generating a lot of what humans could do at the time, it would spark a new era of human creativity.
As computers would take on more of what knowledge workers used to do, and creative outputs from computers would devolve into a sea of sameness:
human creativity would flourish
As he explained, humans would grow more aware of things generated by computers, and would better be able to discern true human creativity when they saw it.
To help us understand this, he gave us an example.
Imagine if anyone could write a song by simply telling a computer what they had in mind, he suggested.
Humans would soon grow tired of songs that were computer-generated.
Those wouldn't be novel anymore.
To hear ones that were truly unique and special, they would want a connection to the human creator, and evidence it was a real person.
They’d want to see the person up close, performing before their own eyes, and listening to the song in a venue with physical spaces and acoustics that couldn’t be replicated digitally.
That would be different, and special.
Not only would creative output rise.
So would appreciation for human-created works.
As he explained it, the potential creativity of humans is unique to each individual and unlimited, whereas machines would only be drawing from a pool of past creations from which to derive their output.
The true power of humans is creativity, and authenticity, he explained.
Humans have lived experiences and emotions, whereas machines do not. He saw this as the major factor that would allow humans to differentiate between human-crafted and machine-produced works.
He painted a picture of live musicians being in higher demand as a result, of live auditoriums filling up in record numbers.
He envisioned people going out to restaurants lured by a chef who loved to surprise her guests with something new and unpredictable each time.
After all, if every conceivable recipe created previously could be accessed and made from home, our very reasons for going out to eat would change.
And more culinary creations would arise.
He depicted a world of people valuing human creativity and distinctively human work differently than they ever had before.
To make his point with a parallel example, he mentioned how mass produced furniture was already becoming more accessible and cheaper.
Meanwhile, the prices of handcrafted furniture were going up faster than ever. He explained to us that the laws of supply and demand dictated that true human creativity would have a higher value in society than ever before.
The future he described was one that I wanted to live in.
My grandfather was one of those carpenters the futurist described.
He sold the results of his own woodworking at local fairs on weekends.
I sometimes got to tag along.
It felt special when people discovered his pieces.
I felt so proud. He was making something so unique and special.
People saw value in them.
I hoped they would treasure them like I did.
They were happy to pay what I thought was a lot of money at the time for things they could never find in any store. Custom crafted, one of a kind creations.
Stamped with his name on the bottom.
A future where creativity could flourish resonated deeply with me.
My brother was an artist, my siblings and I played various instruments, my mother made most of my clothes, which I often helped design.
The creativity we embraced in our family and in my community was not uncommon – after all, we had very few stores nearby.
Making and creating things was normal, and often, necessary.
Coming from a family of creators, I could vividly envision the future he described:
And so on.
Sitting in a room of other children my age from 49 different states, and places as distant and different from where I grew up as Alaska and Hawaii, the idea of digital connectedness, and the ability to stay in touch with these new friends appealed to me hugely.
I wanted this future immediately, right there and then. I didn’t want to have to wait.
Several decades have passed since that Valley Forge experience.
Most of the presidential advisor’s predictions have come true with surprising accuracy.
What I can’t convey in writing is the enthusiasm and joy with which he spoke to a room of 50 young essay winners.
The passion and hope he conveyed about the future of creativity, and a better world that day has stayed with me all this time.
As technology keeps evolving, it’s easy to play into fears about AI and technology displacing ways of doing things that we’re all comfortable with.
Our instinct for survival tells us to be skeptical of change, and to approach it with caution.
Ironically, humans also love the novel, and when brands and other humans offer experiences that catch us by surprise, stand out, and remind us we’re human, we tend to embrace them.
That tension we feel, between the pull of the new and the fear of change, is also incredibly human. While we have healthy skepticism over new technology and its consequences, our curiosity and hunger for progress usually tend to win out.
What I see today, now that I'm nearly half a century old myself, is that humans are blessed with levels of creativity that machines can only ever seek to emulate.
Humans are also defined by emotions, and informed by multi-sensory experiences that only humans can perceive.
These shape not only our creative output, but what makes it unique.
These also inform our judgment - how we intentionally curate what we see and hear.
The predictions of the future I learned about back in Valley Forge have mostly come true.
And if the accuracy of that futurist’s predictions continue, a new creativity era is about to begin.
What’s exciting to me most of all is that our choices and creativity as humans are not ultimately pre-programmed, or determined by a set of algorithms.
How we use our power to not just create, but to choose which creations matter most, to shape the direction of our world, is up to us.
Back then, all I could dream of was leaving my small town and creating a very different future for myself. Not that my life was bad. I just wanted to get more out of it.
I knew that the world had a lot to offer, full of so many fascinating people and cultures.
I also knew that languages were a key to unlock oh-so-many doors, behind which access to untapped human knowledge and experiences sat in wait.
At the end of the day, I’m still that wide-eyed girl who grew up in the cornfields, imagining a better future, as painted by one of the best futurists the U.S. President could employ at the time.
That's precisely part of my lived experience, which gives me a unique perspective, just like you have, and just like everyone else does in this world.
I believe that someday, we'll find better ways to take our unique perspectives and knowledge, unblock them from reaching people, and fuel a better world.
In summary:
No matter what happens with AI or any other disruptive technology,
I prefer to believe the power of human creativity will always win out,
and will ultimately make life better for many,
so that humans and the society we're creating can evolve.
This is my daughter 11 years ago, in the crib my grandfather lovingly made for her in his woodshop, even though he was well into his late 80's at the time. She is wearing the christening gown that her great great grandmother made for my mother by hand.
The determined little look in her eyes gives this Mama hope that she and others from her generation will do what they can to fight for a better future for creators and democratized access to knowledge.
Grace Notes
Connect with Me
Thank you for reading this issue of my newsletter! I hope you found it helpful.
Here are 3 other ways we can connect:
1. Get my books
2. Schedule an author appearance
To book me for a keynote, author talk at your company, or virtual talk,
email me: nataly (at) borntobeglobal.com.
3. Simply reach out
If you want to collaborate in some other way, let me know.
If I can't help, I have a great network.
(Proof: you're in it!)
Message me here on LinkedIn, or email me: nataly (at) borntobeglobal.com.
You can also reach out directly on my website, Born to Be Global.
Thank you for reading!
Nataly
I help coaches & course creators scale with strategy, systems, & copy | Growth Strategist | Copywriter
6moWhat an exciting topic! The potential of AI to unlock a new era of human creativity is truly inspiring. It’s incredible to think how technology can push the boundaries of imagination and help us achieve things we never thought possible. Looking forward to diving into the newsletter and exploring how AI is shaping the future of creativity! Thanks for sharing such a thought-provoking piece!
Director of Client Services | Language Intelligence
6moWell done!
Innovation - Finding ways of matching technology and innovation with purpose 💕
6moSuch a powerful article, it makes me emotional. Thanks for sharing, Nataly 💜 I love this story and love the message that you're trying to communicate. The other day I watched this short clip with Joseph Gordon-Levitt talking about the difference between art and content: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBdFFvxABWE/?igsh=YTJ6NGUyZHBhdnls I do think AI will be a great content generator (and might displace some "content" creators who are just regurgitating stuff that they find somewhere else), but art will remain in the hands of the human creativity forever. I am excited to see the artistic countercurrent that will rise among all AI-generated content, and I feel it's going to be very inspiring 💕
⫸ Illuminating luxury travel brands | Co-founder, Luminar Collective | 15+ yrs in marketing & PR | Driving media recognition, strategic partnerships & growth in experiential & transformational travel
6moAI has transformed the way we work (and live), such an important tool for experimentation or summation. However AI is just that — tool. It can never truly replace humans with all the creativity we bring to the world. I’m looking following to reading your newsletter.
Operations & Growth Strategist | From Strategy to Implementation | Scaling Human-Centered Operations that Enable Teams, Deliver Value, and Drive Results
6moThank you for sharing this. I can say I genuinely feel like AI has gotten me excited about creating things because it allows for rapid experimentation and helps with ideation. And as a result of using it, I've become even more blown away by humans who have produced amazing art, music, literature, etc. in other ways. The world is just fun if you pay attention!