How to Make Priority Calls
So, what’s the priority? If you are in a leadership role, there’s a good chance you get asked that question regularly. That question doesn’t bother me. I enjoy making priority calls. I don’t agonize over it at all. How do I do that? Well, that requires some explanation.
I was just in a meeting earlier this week where this subject came up. I started to talk through my thought process and afterward decided to write it down for you all in this blog article. Here it is.
Prioritization matters
Prioritization is a decision. It’s a decision to commit time, energy, and money toward a goal. There’s an opportunity cost to every decision. When we decide to prioritize something, we implicitly deprioritize something else.
We need to do this because our time and resources are finite. We’d love to do everything, but we can’t, so we must choose to do what makes the most impact.
Speaking of impact, I keep the 80/20 rule in mind. 80% of my results will come from 20% of my efforts. I can’t control everything, but with my discretion, I try to make room for things that I believe have the highest chance of making that big, noteworthy impact. This is the stuff that will matter years from now.
Prioritization questions
I like to ask questions to help me assess the situation. Here are some key questions:
Prioritization happens at four levels:
Cross-team Prioritization
The stark reality is that we do not work in isolation. Our teams are not completely autonomous. We must work together to get important work done. This is a tough nut to crack. I have my method, but before I get into it, I thought I’d share the ways that don’t work:
Negotiate Priorities
I recommend teams negotiate their cross-team priorities. This requires collaboration, relational skills, emotional intelligence, empathy, trust, and patience. When I use the term “negotiate,” I don’t mean like a hostage situation, but rather, a good faith, respectful discussion among colleagues.
I encourage teams to think about their mutual customers and shared strategies. I encourage teams to be transparent with their interests and creative with their solutions.
Whenever possible, this should take place among empowered leaders closest to the context. Escalate only when necessary.
I’m very intentional with my use of the term, “negotiate.” Some of my readers are afraid to do it, or they don’t know how. I once was that way too. Then I learned. Check out my article about that journey here.
Check alignment
This is easy and is a lot better than escalation. When you talk to your boss, tell her, “I worked through this priority call. This is how I worked through it. I involved these people in the discussion. This is the decision I made. Does this make sense to you? Are we aligned?”
Your turn
Those are my tips. As you can tell, I care a lot about making quality priority decisions. They matter. However, you won’t always get it right. Be kind to yourself when you make mistakes. Be kind to others, especially when negotiating cross-team priorities. This is hard work, but you are up for the challenge.
This article was originally posted on zachonleadership.com on February 17, 2023.
Strategic IT Leader | Driving Global Technology Innovation | Inspiring Strategic Direction | Transforming IT for the Future
4moThis is a good read, Zach Hughes, It's interesting how others process decisions and actions.
Asset and Maintenance Management professional | Strategy influencer | Risk based decision maker | Founder at Peak APM Limited
5moGreat article Zach Hughes! I really enjoy seeing other perspectives on prioritisation.
Global Office of Chief Digital Officer | Strategic & Operations Planning | Change Agent | Inspiring Teams to Work Better Together Driving Impactful Results
5moVery timely post, Zach Hughes! We're in the process of implementing a project prioritization process which is global - cross-team and cross-region. Your article reinforces the approach we're taking. We're using an initial project score as a starting point for the real prioritization which is the negotiation, and the project ranking gets adjusted based on the discussion. Discussions with the right stakeholders at the right time are essential. Progressing the negotiations with the right representation (IT, business, functions) while not having a small army of people is a challenge. Can't prioritize too frequently otherwise solution teams will "context switch" leading to wasted efforts. Can't do it only once a year because the business environment changes. There needs to be a balance both with the prioritization frequency and the appropriate number of people who are part of the negotiation.
Global Sourcing Leader | Nearshore, Offshore & Onshore Expert | Helping Companies Scale with Smart, Agile Talent Strategies | Head of Growth | Builder of Dream Teams | CRO | Sales Coach | Technology Industry Expert
5moThanks for sharing Zach