HR Should Review Their Employment Contracts.

HR Should Review Their Employment Contracts.

Delhi High Court’s Stand on Non-Compete Clauses Demands Immediate Attention

The Legal Context: What Happened?

In Varun Tyagi v. Daffodil Software Pvt. Ltd. (2025), the Delhi High Court, led by Justice Tejas  Karia, reaffirmed that post-employment non-compete clauses are void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The court emphasised that such clauses infringe upon the fundamental right to livelihood, holding that:

“An employee cannot be confronted with the situation where he has to either work for the previous employer or remain idle”

The case involved a software engineer who joined Digital India Corporation after serving his notice period with Daffodil Software. Daffodil had sought an injunction based on a three-year non-compete clause—but the High Court struck it down, stating non-compete clauses post-employment are void outright unless tied to selling business goodwill

While this may not be a new position in Indian jurisprudence, it serves as a critical reminder for employers and HR leaders: boilerplate non-compete clauses, however well-intentioned, do not hold legal ground—and relying on them is no longer defensible.

What Risks Do Employers Face Now?

If your current employment contracts still carry broad, post-employment non-compete clauses, you may be exposed to avoidable legal and reputational risks, including:

  • Legal Defeat: Courts are not entertaining restraints on post-employment professional choices. Enforcing such a clause is likely to fail.
  • Employee Pushback and Litigation: Former employees may challenge such clauses in court, file complaints with labor authorities, or raise wrongful restraint claims.
  • Negative Publicity & Brand Damage: Overreaching clauses can hurt your employer branding—especially in talent-sensitive sectors like IT, consulting, or fintech.
  • Scrutiny by Regulators: As Indian employment practices evolve, so does regulatory oversight. Unfair or outdated contract terms may trigger unnecessary attention.

The Most Overlooked Risk — False Sense of Security: Many employers mistakenly believe that a non-compete clause is enough to protect their business secrets and client base. In reality, it offers no legal protection. If your employment agreements do not contain well-drafted confidentiality, IP, and non-solicit clauses, a departing employee can legally walk away with your sensitive data, proprietary know-how, or customer insights—with no real recourse.

What You Can (and Should) Protect Instead

Rather than relying on void post-employment restrictions, employers should shift their focus to legally sustainable, enforceable protections, such as:

  • Comprehensive Confidentiality & Non-Disclosure Clauses Clearly define what constitutes confidential information, including digital assets, IP, business methods, and client data.
  • Robust IP Ownership Provisions Ensure all work product and innovation during employment is contractually owned by the company.
  • Non-Solicitation Clauses Prevent former employees from poaching clients, vendors, or colleagues—without restricting their right to employment elsewhere.
  • Exit Protocols for Data Handling Lay down obligations around return and deletion of sensitive data and devices at the time of resignation.

These tools, when properly drafted and implemented, offer real legal protection—and are far more effective than unenforceable non-compete clauses.

Get Confidentiality Agreement Reviewed >> Click Here

Why Legal Review Is No Longer Optional

With courts reiterating employee-friendly interpretations and the upcoming DPDP Act, 2023 adding new obligations for data handling, employment contracts must be updated to reflect both legal compliance and business protection.

Whether you’re an HR leader, legal head, or founder, now is the right time to:

  • Revisit your employment contract templates
  • Upgrade your confidentiality and IP clauses
  • Review your onboarding and offboarding protocols

Get your Employment Contract reviewed

CorpoTech Legal assist employers in:

  • Auditing existing employment contracts
  • Redrafting legally valid and enforceable clauses
  • Aligning employment documentation with the latest privacy and labour laws

Our consultative approach ensures your contracts are compliant, balanced, and strategically sound—without overstepping what the law permits.

Reach out to schedule a Complimentary confidential review of your Employment Contract.

#EmploymentLaw #NonCompete #HRCompliance #IndianContractAct #DPDPAct #ConfidentialityClause #WorkplaceLaw #AjaySharma #CyberLaw #LegalAdvisory #HRPolicy #Compliance

Vineeta Yadav

Co-President, EMCC Asia Pacific | Career Acceleration Strategist | I help ambitious professionals accelerate their path to senior leadership through proven development insights

1mo

That true Ajay Sharma I have not seen non-compete clauses work in India. Would be better to focus on confidentiality, IP protection and non-solicitation.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics