ICE Raids, Sanctuary Cities, and the Loop We Can’t Escape

In neighborhoods across Los Angeles and Miami, immigration enforcement is no longer happening quietly. It’s happening on sidewalks, in driveways, and outside job sites. ICE agents, often backed by the FBI, DEA, and even military units, are detaining undocumented immigrants in full view of the public—sometimes detaining people who weren’t targets at all, but happened to be nearby. I'm a former FBI law enforcement officer, and I can wholeheartedly say that I would never want to be placed on one of these raids, but the threat of violence to federal agents has required larger responses to make a single arrest.

One raid in Miami ended with a father pulled from his car in front of his wife and child. His brother, sitting in a nearby vehicle, was also cuffed. Not because he was the intended arrest—he wasn’t—but because he was undocumented, too. This practice, known as a “collateral arrest,” is becoming increasingly common as ICE is forced to look to broader enforcement.

This escalation isn’t happening in a vacuum. The Trump administration was given a clear and overwhelming mandate by American voters: secure the border and remove undocumented immigrants living in the United States illegally. That promise—front and center during the 2016 campaign and again in 2024—has become both a political obligation and a logistical challenge. With border crossings down due to strict asylum policies, and with sanctuary cities refusing to hold detainees, ICE has had to shift its focus inward. Agents are now conducting arrests in public spaces, often in defiance of local policies meant to shield immigrant communities. In the past ICE worked with cities to remove criminals from detention facilities.

At the same time, those same cities and states argue they are not defying the law—they’re upholding their own values. In more than 500 sanctuary jurisdictions, local officials say that cooperating with ICE erodes trust in law enforcement, discourages crime reporting, and risks violating civil liberties. They reject the administration’s definition of “criminal,” which now includes working without papers, opening bank accounts, or simply being present in the country without documentation.

What we’re witnessing is a self-reinforcing loop. Local governments block ICE from accessing jails. ICE compensates by moving into public spaces. These highly visible raids often result in collateral arrests, triggering outrage. Protests erupt—some peaceful, some not. Agitators and extreme political operatives use the chaos to create more chaos, loot, riot and destroy. When violence breaks out, the administration points to the chaos as evidence that local policies are failing. Cities dig in further, and the cycle repeats.

Behind the politics is a human cost. Detention centers are overcrowded. Some detainees have asked to be deported just to escape the conditions. In response, the administration now offers financial incentives for self-deportation—$1,000 stipends and travel assistance for those who leave voluntarily. Critics argue this is not policy; it’s pressure.

And while the political clash plays out, it’s important to say this clearly: violence and destruction during protests undermine legitimate grievances. Looting a business or attacking a federal building doesn’t elevate a cause—it sabotages it. Civil discourse loses its power when overtaken by chaos.

There are no easy answers here. The immigration system is outdated, overburdened, and polarized. But continuing this loop—each side escalating in response to the other—won’t break the stalemate. It will only harden it.

The situation requires reform, clarity, and the willingness to face complexity head-on. Until that happens, we’ll keep spinning in this cycle—louder, angrier, and no closer to a solution.

Thoughts welcomed—whether you agree, disagree, or land somewhere in between. Let’s talk policy without the shouting.

#ImmigrationPolicy #SanctuaryCities #ICE #Leadership #RuleOfLaw #LinkedInDebate #EricONeill