Learned helplessness in defence

Learned helplessness in defence

There are 1,440 minutes in your day. Please can I have two — and show you a cutaway view of a submarine.

Look at the image. It’s an engineering marvel. Thousands of systems working in unison, built on precision, control, and clarity. In the deepest complexity, there is simplicity - but only if everyone understands their role, is trusted to act, and the mission is clear.

Now contrast that with how we often operate in Defence at the moment.

It's a sector that's not short of talent, or ideas or drive. It's short of freedom to move.

In many organisations we’ve slipped into a state of learned helplessness. That’s not laziness or cynicism — it’s a conditioned response to a system that punishes risk, tolerates indecision, and rewards delay.

What does this look like?

  • Bureaucracy beats process. Decision loops stretch out endlessly. “No decision” becomes safer than the wrong one. Innovation dies not from bad ideas — but from good ones lost in the admin.
  • Leadership turns over too quickly. Many roles shift just as people become effective. Continuity is sacrificed for career pathways. Everyone starts initiatives — few are around to finish them.
  • Services still compete. We talk joint force, but act as separate tribes. Real integration remains a concept, not a culture.
  • We can’t answer a basic question: What does the UK want to be? And if we can’t answer that, Defence will continue to second-guess its role, direction, and priorities.

And perhaps most damaging of all:

  • Ambition gets quietly squeezed out. People stop pushing ideas, not because they don’t care - but because the system teaches them not to bother.

The result?

A force that knows change is needed… but feels powerless to make it happen. That is learned helplessness. It’s corrosive. And it’s a liability in an age of strategic uncertainty.

So what next?

We need to reset the system to reward motion, not just management.

  • Empower decision-making at the edge — the operator, the technologist, the programme lead.
  • Shorten processes, not just shift deadlines.
  • Create continuity in leadership, not just rotation in roles.
  • Stop the internal competition and become a real joint force.
  • And define our national ambition — so Defence knows not just what it’s protecting, but why it exists at all.

The cutaway of a submarine shows us how complexity can succeed through clarity.

It works because every part has purpose. Every person has trust. Every decision has ownership.

That’s what UK Defence could be — if we break the cycle.

Carl Hall

COO, Experienced Operations Director & Trustee of Wiltshire Sight and Insight Gloucestershire

4w

Not just Defence that is suffering this malaise - NHS has the same sickness...

Craig Dodds

Field Operations Safety Lead, Pg Dip Grad IOSH, Dip NCRQ

1mo

There was a belief that civilisation was at the apex of innovation . Going forward any advances would be incremental in magnitude , compared to what has gone before us. However , is this credible or is it aligned with society becoming more highly risk averse ? Your well written post indicates all the organisational traits which hamper progression in the guise of learned helplessness. What shall be interesting is how Ai may trigger risk aversion amongst us. Shall we blindly accept what the system tells us or shall we apply rigour and due diligence that once again has the potential to paralyse advancement ? Interesting post Ryan

Stuart Boreham

Stuart Boreham - Inspiring Success

1mo

If only this could be achieved, Ryan Ramsey !! I read only today of the incredible/appaling cost overruns on the F35 programme..... As a qualified project manager who has never worked with the beauracratic shackles of government/MOD procurement, I "fail to see" what is so hard about the eternal triangle of Time-Cost-Quality. It's rather "straight forward".... !! Interesting article as always.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics