The Legal Loophole... That Isn’t What It Seems

The Legal Loophole... That Isn’t What It Seems

Back Office, Front Control — Part 1


Private equity can’t own law firms.

At least, not directly. In nearly every U.S. state, ethics rules prohibit non-lawyers from holding equity in law firms, sharing in legal fees, or influencing a lawyer’s professional judgment.

But that hasn’t stopped PE from getting involved. It’s just moved sideways.

Enter the managed services organization (MSO) — a workaround that lets investors own everything around the law firm.

  • The tech stack
  • The intake funnel
  • The admin and ops
  • The brand
  • The staff
  • The lease
  • And most importantly… the contract

With the right MSO structure in place, the law firm becomes dependent on the entity that’s technically not allowed to control it.

Not ownership. But not arms-length either.


🧱 How the MSO Works

The MSO model separates the firm into two legal entities:

Article content

The MSO signs a long-term management services agreement (MSA) with the law firm. In some cases, it also acquires all business-related assets, from leases and trademarks to staff and systems — everything but the legal files and the attorneys themselves.

It’s a structure borrowed from healthcare and accounting. But in law, it’s being used to bypass structural ownership restrictions — while creating functional control.


🔍 So What’s Really Being Bought?

You’re not buying legal revenue. You’re not acquiring equity. You’re not getting enforceable retention from lawyers (non-competes are prohibited).

So what are you buying?

  • Business assets (IP, brand, staff, systems)
  • A sticky, long-term service contract
  • Operational control over everything outside the courtroom
  • Dependence — a firm that needs the MSO to operate


📦 What PE Isn’t Buying — and What It Is


Article content
They’re not buying the firm. They’re buying the system the firm can’t function without.

🧠 Why This Matters

Because it validates a much bigger idea:

The back office isn’t a cost center. It’s a business model.

In most firms, ops is treated like overhead. In the MSO model, ops is the monetization strategy.

That’s not just legal arbitrage — it’s margin innovation.

And if it can work in law, the most regulated and structurally restricted of all the professional services verticals… where else should we be thinking this way?


🦶 Barefoot Take

Everyone’s saying PE is buying law firms. But they’re not.

They’re buying the business beneath the law firm. The business that most firms didn’t even realize was a business.

And they’re doing it through the managed services organization — a structure that monetizes the infrastructure while lawyers keep the equity.

The lawyers can still walk. The MSO can’t touch revenue directly. And the whole structure depends on alignment, not enforcement.

But if you believe what I do — that infrastructure is strategy, and the back office is where margin lives — then Legal MSOs aren’t just a regulatory workaround.

They’re a case study in what happens when the back office becomes the business.


👀 Up Next: Why the Back Office Is the Business Model 🗓️ Drops next Thursday in The Barefoot Back Office

📬 Not subscribed? Hit “Subscribe” at the top to follow along.

Saul Mateos

Chief Financial Officer, Gain 🔸 Transformational Growth Leader 🔸 FP&A & Data Analytics Expert 🔸 Builder of Agile, Top-Ranked Teams

1mo

Thanks for sharing, Nate. Very interesting. Loved it

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore content categories