Liquidity & Funding Gaps and Asset-Liability Management

Liquidity & Funding Gaps and Asset-Liability Management

The Theory Behind Liquidity & Funding Gaps

  • Simplifying Liquidity & Funding Gaps in Banking: A Practical Guide
  • Effective liquidity and funding management are key to ensuring financial stability in banking. Today, let’s break down two crucial concepts—Liquidity Gap and Funding Gap—with an example to make it simple and practical.

What Are Liquidity & Funding Gaps?

1- Liquidity Gap The liquidity gap measures the mismatch between a bank’s expected cash inflows and outflows within a specific period. It reflects the bank’s ability to meet its short-term obligations.

  • Formula: Liquidity Gap = Projected Cash Inflows – Projected Cash Outflows

2- Funding Gap The funding gap shows the difference between a bank’s funding sources (like deposits) and its total funding requirements (like loans). A negative funding gap indicates that the bank relies on external borrowing or other funding strategies.

  • Formula: Funding Gap = Total Loans – Total Deposits

A Practical Example: Breaking It Down

Let’s consider a simplified example of a bank’s balance sheet:

Article content

Step 1: Calculating Liquidity Gap

Let’s focus on the 0–30 days bucket:

  • Formula: Liquidity Gap = Cash Inflows – Cash Outflows
  • Calculation: Liquidity Gap = $50M – $70M = -$20M

This indicates a $20 million shortfall in this time bucket, meaning the bank needs to find additional cash to meet its short-term obligations.


Step 2: Calculating Funding Gap

Now, let’s assess the total funding gap for the bank:

  1. Total Loans: $500M (0–30 days) + $200M (31–90 days) + $300M (91–180 days) = $1,000M
  2. Total Deposits: $400M (0–30 days) + $150M (31–90 days) + $250M (91–180 days) = $800M

  • Formula: Funding Gap = Total Loans – Total Deposits
  • Calculation: Funding Gap = $1,000M – $800M = -$200M

This negative funding gap shows a $200 million shortfall, requiring the bank to borrow externally or use alternative funding methods to cover the deficit.

Funding & Liquidity Gaps in Banking: Causes and Impacts

Managing funding and liquidity gaps is a core challenge for banks, directly influencing profitability, regulatory compliance, and market confidence. Let’s dive into the detailed causes and impacts of these gaps, explained with relatable examples

Causes of Funding & Liquidity Gaps

1- Asset-Liability Mismatch Banks often rely on short-term liabilities (like deposits) to fund long-term assets (like loans). This creates a timing mismatch. Example:

  • A bank funds a 5-year loan of $10M at 5% using 1-year deposits of $8M at 3%.
  • Risk: If deposits are not renewed after 1 year, the bank must refinance at potentially higher rates. A rate rise of 6% increases costs significantly.

2- Market Conditions External market events can impact a bank's ability to raise funds and manage liquidity. Example:

  • A bank holds $200M in short-term borrowings at 4%. During a financial crisis, credit spreads widen, raising borrowing costs to 6%.
  • Impact: Annual funding costs rise by $4M (200M * (6% – 4%)). Real Risk: During the 2008 crisis, banks heavily reliant on short-term wholesale funding faced severe liquidity pressures as markets froze.

3- Operational Factors Inefficiencies in cash flow management or over-reliance on limited funding sources can exacerbate gaps. Example:

  • A bank forecasts inflows of $50M for the month but receives only $30M due to unexpected defaults.
  • Result: Outflows of $60M create a $30M liquidity shortfall, highlighting risks from poor forecasting or operational errors.

4- Regulatory Pressure Regulations like the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) require banks to maintain specific buffers. Example:

  • A bank falls short on its High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) for LCR compliance and must sell non-liquid assets at a loss to meet obligations.
  • Impact: Financial strain and reputational damage.


Impacts of Funding & Liquidity Gaps


1- Short-Term Impact: High-cost funding banks often use expensive borrowing to address liquidity gaps. Example:

  • A bank faces a $50M gap and borrows at 7% for 30 days.
  • Cost: $287,671 ($50M 7% (30/365)).
  • Risk: Frequent short-term borrowing reduces profitability.

2- Long-Term Impact: Refinancing Risk Reliance on short-term liabilities for long-term funding increases risks, especially in rising-rate environments. Example:

  • A $100M loan portfolio at 5% is funded by $90M in 1-year borrowings at 3%.
  • If rates rise to 6%, interest expenses increase by $2.7M annually ($90M * (6% – 3%)).
  • Result: Eroded margins and weakened profitability.

3- Interest Rate Risk Mismatch in asset and liability durations exposes banks to rate fluctuations, impacting earnings and equity value. Example:

  • A loan portfolio has a duration of 5 years, while liabilities average 2 years.
  • A 1% rate rise reduces asset values by 5% and liability values by 2%, leading to a net loss in balance sheet value.
  • Impact: Reduced regulatory capital and investor confidence.

4- Reputational Risk Failure to address funding gaps can lead to depositor panic and potential bank runs. Example:

  • A $100M funding gap delays payment obligations, triggering withdrawal requests exceeding $500M.
  • Result: A self-fulfilling liquidity crisis damaging depositor trust.

5- Regulatory Breaches and Penalties Non-compliance with liquidity ratios can invite penalties and operational restrictions. Example:

  • A bank’s LCR drops to 90%, below the required 100%, leading to fines and restrictions on lending activity.
  • Impact: Hurt profitability and market standing.

Key Takeaways

Monitoring Gaps: Keep a close eye on funding and liquidity gaps across various time horizons to ensure stability.

Hedging Strategies: Leverage tools like swaps, repos, and other financial instruments to address funding mismatches effectively.

Diversification: Reduce dependency on any one funding source by diversifying your funding portfolio.

Liquidity and funding gaps are inevitable for financial institutions, but with proactive management, these challenges can be transformed into opportunities for sustained growth and stability.


What’s your approach to addressing liquidity and funding challenges? Please provide your insights!

#LiquidityRisk #FundingGaps #TreasuryManagement #BankingInsights


Disclaimer - This article's views, opinions, and information are only for educational, personal, and informational purposes.

Sri Krishnan

AVP - Delivery Manager at Standard Chartered Bank

9mo

Simple and Clear brief. very thoughtful. Thanks

R.K. S.

Liquidity Risk | Asset-Liability Management | FTP | Securities Lending | Liquidity Risk | Banking Innovation| IT Consulting & Software Development | Data Solutions & Advanced Analytics | Business Analysis Services

10mo

Very informative

Dheeraj Karn, CFA

Sr. Quant Risk Specialist | CFA Charterholder | PGD IB - NSE Academy | BCOM (H) - Delhi University | Python | AI

10mo

Very informative

Subham Khinchi

Financial Mathematics at NC State University | ex- Wells Fargo |IIT Roorkee

10mo

Insightful

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore content categories