The Living Cloud: Renting Brainpower with Wetware-as-a-Service

Introduction: When Biology Boots Up

Imagine logging into a web console, not to spin up a familiar silicon-based virtual machine, but to access a cluster of living, learning neurons housed miles away in a specialized lab. Forget the hum of servers powered by silicon chips; the next great leap in computation might feel distinctly... squishy. This isn't a scene from a distant science fiction future; it's the emerging reality of Wetware-as-a-Service (WaaS) and the closely related field of Organoid Intelligence (OI). These concepts represent a radical departure from conventional computing, proposing to harness the power of biology itself for information processing.

For decades, the evolution of computing services has followed a path paved with silicon, moving from physical hardware to Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). Even the more exotic paradigms like Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) operate on fundamentally non-living substrates. WaaS, however, marks a profound shift. It introduces living biological material – the "wetware" of neurons and other brain cells – as the core computational element. This isn't merely an incremental improvement or a change in how computation is performed; it's a fundamental change in what is doing the computing. This approach seeks to leverage the products of billions of years of evolution – systems optimized for complex information processing, adaptation, and remarkable energy efficiency. Instead of relying solely on human-designed logic gates, WaaS aims to tap into the power of self-organizing, adaptive biological systems. The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), advanced sensors, and biotechnology is paving the way for what some call "living intelligence" – systems capable of sensing, learning, adapting, and evolving in ways fundamentally different from current machines.

At its heart, WaaS involves renting remote access to lab-grown brain organoids or clusters of neurons, managed through familiar cloud interfaces like APIs and web consoles.This service model abstracts away the immense complexity of cultivating and maintaining living biological tissue, offering researchers and developers the potential to experiment with biological computation without needing their own wet lab.

This burgeoning field forces us to confront fundamental questions. Can biological systems truly compute, and can they outperform silicon for certain types of problems?What revolutionary breakthroughs in medicine, AI, and energy efficiency might this technology unlock?And perhaps most importantly, as we engineer systems that blur the line between living tissue and intelligent machine, what profound ethical boundaries are we approaching, or perhaps even crossing? The journey into WaaS is not just a technological exploration; it's a deep dive into the nature of intelligence, computation, and life itself.

Decoding the Wetware: More Than Just Brains in a Dish

To understand WaaS, one must first grasp the concept of "wetware." It serves as the biological counterpart to the familiar terms "hardware" and "software" in traditional computing. Wetware is composed of organic materials, primarily living neurons and other neural cells, arranged to perform computational tasks. Unlike conventional computers where the physical structure (hardware) is distinct from the instructions it executes (software), wetware exhibits a remarkable intertwining of the two. The very molecular and cellular structure of the wetware is the computational device, and its "programming" involves dynamic changes – shifts in electrical pulses, chemical gradients, and the physical rewiring of connections – that fundamentally alter its structure. This inherent dynamism contrasts sharply with the static silicon architecture of today's computers.

Central to the current implementation of WaaS are brain organoids, often referred to colloquially as "mini-brains".These are not fully formed brains, but rather three-dimensional, self-organizing structures grown in vitro from stem cells, frequently human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).These organoids can develop diverse populations of neural cells, including neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, and spontaneously form complex neural networks that mimic certain aspects of early brain development and structure.Their 3D nature allows for significantly higher cell density and more complex connectivity compared to traditional 2D cell cultures, making them more physiologically relevant models.

Explaining this technology requires moving beyond simple analogies like "biological virtual machines." Consider these alternative perspectives:

• A Biological GPU: Cortical Labs uses this term for its CL1 system, highlighting the potential for specialized, powerful processing, albeit biological in nature.
• An Orchestra of Neurons: Imagine sending electrical or chemical stimuli – the musical "score" – via an API. The WaaS platform listens, via microelectrode arrays, to the resulting symphony of electrical activity – the "spike trains" or neural firing patterns – providing real-time data on how the neural network is responding and processing the information.
• Living Circuits: Unlike the fixed pathways etched onto a silicon chip, the connections (axons, dendrites, synapses) in a wetware system possess plasticity. They can physically strengthen, weaken, or even form new pathways based on the "experience" provided by stimuli, allowing the circuit to learn and adapt organically.
• The Cell-as-Computer: At a fundamental level, individual cells are complex information processing systems. They receive inputs (chemical signals, environmental changes), process this information through intricate internal networks (like signaling pathways), and produce outputs (protein synthesis, changes in behavior).WaaS essentially scales up this inherent biological computation.
• Neurons as Communication Channels: From an information theory perspective, neurons act like channels, receiving, processing, and transmitting signals, albeit with inherent biological "noise" and complexity that differs from clean digital signals.

This leads to the concept of Organoid Intelligence (OI). OI is the interdisciplinary field dedicated to integrating these brain organoids with technologies like AI, machine learning, and brain-machine interfaces.The goal is to create biocomputing systems capable of learning, memory formation, and information processing, leveraging the unique computational strengths of biological neural networks.

The fundamental value proposition of wetware, therefore, stems directly from these intrinsic biological characteristics. The self-assembly of organoids from stem cells represents a bottom-up approach to creating complex computational structures, contrasting with the top-down manufacturing of silicon chips.This biological origin imbues wetware with properties like plasticity – the ability for the "software" (learning) to physically alter the "hardware" (neural connections).This tight integration of structure and function, a hallmark of living systems, is precisely what researchers hope to harness for tasks requiring adaptation, energy efficiency, and potentially even new forms of intelligence that silicon, or even silicon-based neuromorphic chips that merely mimic biology, cannot easily replicate.

How to Rent a Brain Slice: Peeking Inside the WaaS Platform

The core idea behind Wetware-as-a-Service is to make the power of biological computation accessible without requiring users to become expert cell biologists or tissue engineers. The WaaS model abstracts away the intricate and demanding processes involved in maintaining living neural cultures – the precise control of sterile growth media, temperature, oxygen levels, waste removal via microfluidic systems, and the delicate handling of the organoids themselves.Instead, users interact with the biological hardware remotely through familiar developer tools: web consoles, REST APIs, and dedicated software libraries, often compatible with Python and interactive environments like Jupyter Notebooks. Billing typically follows a pay-as-you-go model, similar to renting GPU time in the cloud, where users pay for the time their biological compute instances are active.

The critical link between the digital control systems and the living wetware is the Micro-Electrode Array (MEA). These arrays are grids containing numerous tiny electrodes upon which the neurons or organoids sit. Think of it, as suggested by researchers at Johns Hopkins, like a sophisticated "EEG cap for organoids".This interface serves a dual purpose: it "listens" by recording the minute electrical signals (action potentials or "spike trains") generated by neuronal activity, and it "talks" by delivering precise electrical or chemical stimuli to influence and train the neural network. This bidirectional communication is essential for running experiments, providing input data, and observing the computational output of the wetware. The sheer volume of data generated can be immense; FinalSpark, for instance, reported collecting over 18 terabytes from experiments involving over 1,000 organoids.

Currently, two main commercial players exemplify the emerging WaaS landscape, each adopting a slightly different approach:

Cortical Labs (CL1 System):

This Australian company focuses on the concept of Synthetic Biological Intelligence (SBI), aiming to fuse living neurons with silicon hardware to create a new class of AI. Their flagship product is the CL1, marketed as the "world's first code deployable biological computer". The CL1 is an integrated hardware unit containing human neurons cultivated on a silicon chip, complete with its own life support systems and a proprietary Biological Intelligence Operating System (biOS) that manages the interaction between the digital controls and the living cells. Cortical Labs gained significant attention for demonstrating that their earlier "DishBrain" system (a precursor to CL1) could learn to play the video game Pong, reportedly learning faster than some traditional AI algorithms. They offer the CL1 unit for direct purchase (priced around $35,000 USD, with shipments expected mid-2025) and also provide remote access via their "Cortical Cloud" WaaS platform. A key specification is the neuron lifespan within the CL1 system, stated to be up to six months.

FinalSpark (Neuroplatform):

The Swiss startup FinalSpark has taken a platform-centric approach with its Neuroplatform. This service provides purely remote online access to biological neurons, specifically human brain organoids housed across four MEAs in their Swiss facility. Their architecture includes sophisticated microfluidic systems for automated life support, monitoring cameras, and even UV light controls for precise chemical stimulation via molecule uncaging. The platform is accessed via API (Python/Jupyter) and is designed to support complex, long-term experiments, including closed-loop strategies and integration with deep learning and reinforcement learning libraries.They have highlighted the use of dopamine pulses to implement reward-based learning mechanisms.FinalSpark primarily targets research institutions, offering subscriptions (around $500-$1000 USD per month per user) and collaborating with universities to advance biocomputing research. The stated operational lifespan for their organoids is approximately 100 days.

The emergence of these distinct business models – Cortical Labs offering integrated hardware alongside cloud access, and FinalSpark focusing solely on a remote platform – signals an early stage of market development. Companies are exploring different strategies to balance the high potential of biological computing with the inherent complexities of managing living systems.The hardware model might appeal to users needing deep integration or specific configurations, while the platform model lowers the barrier to entry for researchers. The differing reported lifespans also suggest variations in the underlying biological maintenance technologies or operational philosophies. This divergence reflects the ongoing quest to find the optimal way to package and deliver the unique capabilities of wetware to a broader audience.

The Biological Advantage: Why Wetware Might Outpace Silicon

The allure of WaaS and OI extends beyond novelty; it stems from the potential for biological systems to fundamentally outperform silicon-based computers in specific, critical domains. These advantages primarily revolve around energy efficiency, learning capabilities, and the unique ability to interface directly with biology itself.

The Energy Equation:

Perhaps the most striking potential advantage is energy efficiency. Living neurons operate with incredible frugality, consuming power measured in milliwatts, whereas modern data centers and supercomputers guzzle megawatts.The entire human brain, with its estimated 86-100 billion neurons and quadrillions of connections, runs on roughly 20 watts – less power than a standard light bulb.This stands in stark contrast to the energy demands of training large-scale AI models; training a model like GPT-3 reportedly required around 10 gigawatt-hours of energy, equivalent to the annual consumption of thousands of European households. FinalSpark claims its bioprocessors could be a million times more power-efficient than traditional digital processors. This dramatic difference suggests WaaS could be crucial for developing more sustainable AI and enabling complex computations in remote or power-constrained environments, like off-grid sensors or potentially even implantable devices.

Learning Like Life:

Biological neural networks possess an innate capacity for adaptive learning that current AI systems struggle to replicate efficiently. Neurons exhibit plasticity, meaning they can physically change the strength of their connections (synapses) or even form new ones in response to stimuli and experience. This allows biological networks to learn continuously, adapt to new information, and potentially generalize from fewer examples than traditional machine learning models.Demonstrations like Cortical Labs' DishBrain learning Pong and Indiana University's Brainoware achieving 78% accuracy on speech recognition after just two days of training offer glimpses of this potential. Furthermore, biological brains appear uniquely adept at handling complex, ambiguous, uncertain, or incomplete information – scenarios where conventional algorithms often falter.

Solving Biology with Biology:

One of the most compelling applications of WaaS lies in biomedical research. By using human cells, particularly patient-derived iPSCs, researchers can create highly relevant personalized disease models in vitro. Imagine creating a "mini-brain" organoid that replicates the specific pathology of an individual patient suffering from Alzheimer's , Parkinson's , autism , multiple sclerosis , or other neurological disorders. These patient-specific organoids allow researchers to study disease mechanisms, screen potential drug candidates, and test toxicity with unprecedented accuracy and relevance to human biology. This approach could dramatically accelerate drug discovery and reduce the reliance on animal models, which often fail to accurately predict human responses. This convergence of WaaS/OI with personalized medicine, creating tailored "disease-in-a-dish" models , represents a potential paradigm shift from generic treatments to highly individualized therapeutic strategies.

The Edge of 'Cellular Supremacy':

Beyond efficiency and specific applications, some researchers envision scenarios of "cellular supremacy" – tasks where biological computation might be inherently superior to silicon, not just faster or more efficient, but capable of solving problems inaccessible to traditional computers. This might involve processing complex real-world sensory data, navigating highly ambiguous environments, solving problems requiring massive parallelism combined with self-organization and adaptation, or controlling complex biological processes directly, such as guiding bioremediation efforts. While concrete examples are still emerging (some theoretical problems like the density classification task or firing-squad synchronization problem are explored in cellular automata contexts ), the idea suggests that wetware's true potential might lie in tackling problems uniquely suited to its biological nature.

Ultimately, the disruptive potential of WaaS may not be in replacing general-purpose silicon computers across the board. Instead, its strength likely lies in excelling at specific, complex tasks where the inherent biological advantages – extreme energy efficiency, adaptive learning from sparse or noisy data, and the ability to directly model and interact with biological systems – provide a decisive edge. Rather than aiming to beat silicon at arithmetic, WaaS and OI seem poised to carve out high-value niches in personalized medicine, advanced pattern recognition, sustainable computing, and perhaps entirely new forms of artificial intelligence grounded in the principles of life itself.

Meet the Pioneers Wiring Up Life Itself

The journey to harness biological computation is being led by a dynamic mix of ambitious startups and pioneering academic institutions. These groups are not only developing the core technologies but also shaping the commercial landscape and ethical frameworks for this nascent field.

Commercial Frontrunners:

The two most prominent companies offering early WaaS capabilities are Cortical Labs and FinalSpark, each carving out a distinct path:

• Cortical Labs: Having transitioned from the research-focused "DishBrain" to the commercial CL1 system , Cortical Labs is pushing its vision of Synthetic Biological Intelligence (SBI). Backed by funding rounds including $10 million USD in 2022 , they offer both the physical CL1 unit for purchase and remote access via their WaaS cloud platform. Their work towards a "Minimal Viable Brain" underscores their ambition to engineer increasingly complex and functional biological computing systems.
• FinalSpark: This Swiss startup focuses exclusively on providing remote access to its Neuroplatform. They emphasize energy efficiency and target the academic research community, fostering collaborations with numerous institutions (initially nine, with dozens more expressing interest). Their platform's capabilities, including sophisticated API control and reinforcement learning integration position them as a key enabler for wetware computing research. Their long-term vision includes establishing a "bio-cloud" computing network.34

Academic Vanguard:

Alongside commercial efforts, academic research remains crucial for advancing the fundamental science and addressing key challenges:

• Johns Hopkins University (JHU): A leading force in defining the field of Organoid Intelligence (OI), spearheaded by researchers like Professor Thomas Hartung. JHU has been instrumental in promoting an "embedded ethics" approach and establishing foundational principles through efforts like the Baltimore Declaration.
• Indiana University (Luddy School): The Brainoware project, led by Professor Feng Guo and collaborators, is making significant strides in using organoids for reservoir computing. Their successful demonstration of speech recognition using organoids highlights the potential for practical computational tasks. This work is supported by substantial NSF funding.
• POSTECH/UNIST (Korea): Researchers here developed the UniMat platform, utilizing engineered nanofiber membranes to enable the scalable and uniform production of mature organoids, directly addressing the critical challenge of reproducibility.
• Other Key Institutions: Research groups at MIT are tackling organoid uniformity. Early foundational work traces back to Georgia Tech.Collaborations exist with institutions like the University of Cambridge (e.g., bit.bio partnership with Cortical Labs ) and universities in China, such as Tianjin University, which has explored using organoid systems to control robots.

This ecosystem is further bolstered by government support, notably the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), which invested $14 million USD in its Biocomputing through EnGINeering Organoid Intelligence (BEGIN OI) program, funding projects like the one at Indiana University. This interplay between commercial drive and academic rigor is essential for navigating the complex path towards realizing the potential of WaaS and OI.

The Bumpy Road to Biological Computing: Hurdles and Headaches

Despite the exciting potential and rapid progress, the path towards widespread adoption of WaaS and OI is fraught with significant technical challenges. These hurdles stem largely from the inherent complexity and variability of working with living biological systems, a stark contrast to the predictable, controllable nature of silicon manufacturing.

• Scalability: Current brain organoids typically contain tens or hundreds of thousands of neurons. While impressive, achieving computational power comparable to even simple animal brains, let alone human capabilities, would likely require scaling up to millions or even billions of interconnected neurons. This presents enormous challenges in tissue engineering, nutrient supply, and waste removal for larger 3D structures. Platforms like UniMat aim to improve scalable production, but significant advances are needed.
• Reproducibility and Consistency: Biological systems are inherently variable. Ensuring that different batches of organoids, or even different instances within the same WaaS platform, behave predictably and consistently is a major obstacle. This "snowflake" problem, where each organoid might be unique, makes it difficult to guarantee reliable computational results, a necessity for any practical service offering. Achieving uniformity in structure and function across organoids is a key research focus.
• Lifespan and Stability: Unlike silicon chips that can last for decades, biological wetware has a limited lifespan. Current WaaS platforms report operational lifespans ranging from around 100 days to 6 months. Maintaining the health and viability of these sensitive biological systems requires sophisticated, automated life support systems, including precisely controlled microfluidic environments. Ensuring long-term stability and minimizing disruptions are critical for practical applications.
• Interface and Input/Output (I/O): Effectively communicating with complex, 3D neural structures remains challenging. While MEAs provide a crucial interface, they primarily access neurons near the surface. Developing methods to reliably stimulate and record activity deep within organoids, and achieving the high bandwidth needed for complex computation, requires further innovation beyond current electrode technologies.
• Training and Programming: Biological neural networks learn through mechanisms like synaptic plasticity, which are fundamentally different from the backpropagation algorithms used to train artificial neural networks (ANNs). Discovering effective and efficient methods to "program" or train wetware to perform specific computational tasks is a major research frontier. This may involve adapting techniques like reinforcement learning or gaining a deeper understanding of biological learning rules and activation functions.
• Complexity and Fundamental Understanding: A core challenge is that we still lack a complete understanding of how biological brains, even simple ones, actually compute and learn. We are trying to engineer systems based on principles we haven't fully deciphered. Furthermore, current organoid models, while improving, still lack key features of real brains, such as vascularization (blood vessels), a full complement of cell types (like microglia in some models ), and the complex layered architecture of the cortex. This limits their fidelity as computational models.

These challenges underscore a fundamental tension: the goal of WaaS is to leverage the unique strengths of biology – its adaptability, self-organization, and efficiency – for computation. Yet, these very biological properties – variability, complexity, limited lifespan, and our incomplete understanding – are what make them difficult to engineer into predictable, reliable, and scalable computing systems. Overcoming these hurdles requires not just advances in computer science and engineering, but fundamental breakthroughs in stem cell biology, tissue engineering, neuroscience, and our basic understanding of life's computational strategies.

Echoes in the Petri Dish: The Ethical Maze of Organoid Intelligence

As WaaS and OI technologies advance, they push us into uncharted ethical territory, raising questions that cut to the core of our understanding of life, consciousness, and humanity. The potential to create sophisticated computational systems from living human brain cells necessitates careful consideration and proactive societal dialogue.

The Consciousness Question:

The most profound and widely discussed ethical issue is the potential for complex brain organoids, especially as they are scaled up and integrated into computational systems, to develop some form of consciousness, sentience, or the capacity to experience pain and suffering. While current organoids are far simpler than a human brain and lack the sensory inputs and integrated structure thought necessary for consciousness, the trajectory of the research raises concerns. Compounding the issue is the lack of scientific consensus on what consciousness actually is or how to definitively detect its presence, especially in a non-verbal entity like an organoid. Some have proposed mitigating risks through enforced amnesia or limiting operational duration without memory resets.

Moral Status and Human Dignity:

If consciousness or sentience were to arise, what moral status should these biological-computational hybrids possess? Do they warrant protections similar to animals or even humans? This question is deeply intertwined with concepts of human dignity, particularly since the organoids are derived from human cells. Does the organoid inherit some aspect of the donor's dignity? How should these entities be treated, especially in research involving potentially harmful stimuli or termination of experiments?

Donor Consent, Privacy, and Bias:

The use of human cells, often derived from patient iPSCs for disease modeling, raises significant ethical issues related to the donor. Standard informed consent procedures are crucial, but unique questions arise. What information should donors receive about the potential uses of their cells, especially if those uses involve creating systems with cognitive potential? Do donors retain any rights over the organoids created from their cells, or any discoveries made using them? Could the organoid's behavior or genetic analysis inadvertently reveal sensitive health information about the donor? There are also concerns about potential bias in donor selection, for instance, choosing donors based on perceived cognitive abilities, which could perpetuate societal biases within the technology itself.

Human-Animal Chimeras:

Research involving the transplantation of human brain organoids into animal models (xenotransplantation) to study development or disease in a more complex environment raises specific ethical flags. Concerns center on the potential for "humanization" of the animal, potentially altering its cognitive abilities, consciousness, or moral status, and blurring species boundaries.

Regulation, Governance, and Societal Engagement:

There is a strong consensus among researchers and ethicists that proactive ethical frameworks and robust governance structures are needed now, before the technology potentially outpaces our ability to manage its implications. Current regulatory frameworks may not adequately cover the unique aspects of OI. Initiatives like the Baltimore Declaration and the promotion of "embedded ethics" – integrating ethical analysis directly into the research process – represent crucial steps. Engaging the public in these discussions is also deemed vital to ensure societal acceptance and alignment with public values, learning from past controversies with technologies like GMOs.

The ethical landscape of OI and WaaS is uniquely challenging because it sits at the intersection of rapidly advancing AI, biotechnology, and neuroscience. It forces us to grapple not only with practical issues like data privacy and consent, common to many technologies, but also with fundamental philosophical questions about the nature of consciousness, the definition of life, and the moral responsibilities that arise when we begin to engineer intelligence using the building blocks of humanity itself. The proactive push for ethical guidelines signifies a crucial recognition within the field: building public trust through transparency and responsible development is paramount for the future of this potentially transformative technology.

Conclusion: The Dawn of Living Intelligence?

Wetware-as-a-Service and Organoid Intelligence represent more than just another iteration in cloud computing or artificial intelligence. They mark the tentative beginnings of a potentially revolutionary era where computation is performed not by inert silicon, but by living biological matter. While still nascent, the field is rapidly progressing from laboratory concepts to tangible, albeit early-stage, commercial offerings and research platforms. Companies like Cortical Labs and FinalSpark are providing the first glimpses of what renting brainpower might look like, while academic institutions push the boundaries of what these biological systems can achieve and grapple with the profound implications.

The transformative potential is immense. WaaS could unlock new frontiers in personalized medicine, enabling patient-specific disease modeling and drug discovery with unprecedented accuracy, particularly for devastating neurological conditions like Alzheimer's disease. It offers a compelling path towards dramatically more energy-efficient computing, potentially mitigating the unsustainable power demands of large-scale AI and enabling computation in novel contexts. Furthermore, the inherent adaptability and learning capabilities of biological neural networks might lead to breakthroughs in specific computational tasks where traditional AI struggles, particularly those involving complex pattern recognition, uncertainty, and interaction with the biological world.

However, the road ahead is steep and uncertain, paved with significant technical hurdles related to scalability, reproducibility, stability, interfacing, and our fundamental understanding of biological computation. These challenges are intrinsically linked to the complexity and variability of life itself, demanding interdisciplinary innovation across biology, engineering, and computer science.

Looming even larger are the ethical considerations. The prospect of creating increasingly sophisticated cognitive systems from human brain cells compels us to confront deep questions about consciousness, moral status, human dignity, and the very definition of intelligence.3 Navigating this ethical maze requires careful deliberation, proactive governance, and broad societal engagement.

Looking forward, the most likely trajectory involves not a replacement of silicon, but a synergy between biological and digital intelligence. Hybrid systems that combine the strengths of WaaS/OI – adaptability, energy efficiency, biological interfacing – with the speed and precision of traditional AI and silicon hardware seem probable. Achieving widespread use will also necessitate the development of standardized protocols for interoperability and the realization of a true "bio-cloud" ecosystem.

As I explored in a previous piece discussing Organoid Intelligence, analogies like the initially underestimated ventures of humorist Will Rogers and comedian-turned-mayor Jon Gnarr illustrate how ideas that seem outlandish at first glance can sometimes reshape the world in unexpected ways. Wetware-as-a-Service might currently seem like a niche, futuristic concept. Yet, it represents a fundamental shift in our approach to computation, moving towards harnessing the power of life itself. Whether it fulfills its revolutionary promise remains to be seen, but WaaS is undeniably poised to redefine the boundaries between biology and technology, forcing us to rethink intelligence and our place within an increasingly computationally capable world. The era of computing with life may just be dawning.

If you want to know more about this please check these out

1. Edmund White https://www.ai2oi.com/about-the-book
2. Meet the computer that runs on human neurons | Cybernews, accessed April 26, 2025, https://cybernews.com/tech/biological-computers-human-neurons/
3. World's first "Synthetic Biological Intelligence" runs on living human ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://newatlas.com/brain/cortical-bioengineered-intelligence/
4. Organoid intelligence - Wikipedia, accessed April 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organoid_intelligence
5. Brain on a Chip: Exploring the Potential of Wetware Computing - ResearchGate, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377357208_Brain_on_a_Chip_Exploring_the_Potential_of_Wetware_Computing
6. Wetware computer - Wikipedia, accessed April 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetware_computer
7. Singularity2030 Dynamic Reference Book, accessed April 26, 2025, https://singularity2030.ch/singularity2030-dynamic-reference-book.pdf
8. Wetware-as-a-Service: The Coming Revolution in Synthetic ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://anshadameenza.com/blog/technology/wetware-as-a-service-synthetic-biological-intelligence/
9. A breakthrough in computing: Cortical Labs' CL1 is the ... - TechRadar, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.techradar.com/pro/a-breakthrough-in-computing-cortical-labs-cl1-is-the-first-living-biocomputer-and-costs-almost-the-same-as-apples-best-failure
10. Cortical Labs Secures $10M to Revolutionise AI with Biological Neurons - Oxford Global, accessed April 26, 2025, https://oxfordglobal.com/discovery-development/resources/cortical-labs-secures-10m-to-revolutionise-ai-with-biological-neurons
11. 'Wetware': a New Approach to AI-Computing? › SINGULARITY 2030, accessed April 26, 2025, https://singularity2030.ch/wetware-a-new-approach-to-ai-computing/
12. Editorial: Intersection between the biological and digital: synthetic biological intelligence and organoid intelligence - Frontiers, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2024.1542629/epub
13. Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing - PMC, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11097343/
14. FinalSpark Launches the First Remote Research Platform Using Human Neurons for Biocomputing - Business Wire, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240515701469/en/FinalSpark-Launches-the-First-Remote-Research-Platform-Using-Human-Neurons-for-Biocomputing
15. (PDF) Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380315842_Open_and_remotely_accessible_Neuroplatform_for_research_in_wetware_computing
16. Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing - PubMed, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38756757/
17. Cortical Labs Debuts World's First Commercial Biological Computer - Cyber News Centre, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.cybernewscentre.com/cortical-labs-debuts-worlds-first-commercial-biological-computer/
18. Roadmap shows how 'wetware' can power AI computers ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/roadmap-shows-how-wetware-can-power-ai-computers/
19. (PDF) Organoid Intelligence and Biocomputing Advances: Current ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388493358_Organoid_Intelligence_and_Biocomputing_Advances_Current_Steps_and_Future_Directions
20. Organoid intelligence: society must engage in the ethics — Frontiers ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://policylabs.frontiersin.org/content/policy-outlook-julian-kinderlerer-organoid-intelligence-society-must-engage-in-the-ethics
21. Brain organoids and organoid intelligence from ethical, legal, and social points of view - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10796793/
22. Organoid intelligence (OI) – The ultimate functionality of a brain microphysiological system, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.altex.org/index.php/altex/article/view/2630?articlesBySameAuthorPage=9
23. Pathways to cellular supremacy in biocomputing - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6868219/
24. Brain organoids and organoid intelligence from ethical, legal, and social points of view - Frontiers, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2023.1307613/full
25. Organoid Intelligence (OI): A New Frontier in Bio-Inspired Computing | Sino Biological, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.sinobiological.com/resource/organoid-review/organoid-intelligence
26. Luddy professor pioneered ground-breaking organoid computing ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://news.iu.edu/luddy/live/news/44589-luddy-professor-pioneered-ground-breaking-organoid
27. Pros and Cons of Human Brain Organoids to Study Alzheimer's Disease, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2024.1409
28. Brain organoid methodologies to explore mechanisms of disease in progressive multiple sclerosis - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11688374/
29. Current progress of cerebral organoids for modeling Alzheimer's disease origins and mechanisms - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013781/
30. Human brain organoids in Alzheimer's disease, accessed April 26, 2025, https://j-organoid.org/journal/view.php?number=7
31. Intersection between the biological and digital: Synthetic Biological Intelligence and Organoid Intelligence | Frontiers Research Topic, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/57378/intersection-between-the-biological-and-digital-synthetic-biological-intelligence-and-organoid-intelligence/magazine
32. Task Learning through Stimulation-Induced Plasticity in Neural Networks | PRX Life, accessed April 26, 2025, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXLife.2.043014
33. Task Learning through Stimulation-Induced Plasticity in Neural Networks - ResearchGate, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386162307_Task_Learning_through_Stimulation-Induced_Plasticity_in_Neural_Networks
34. Wetware: A computer in every living cell - ResearchGate, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287845156_Wetware_A_computer_in_every_living_cell
35. Editorial: Intersection between the biological and digital: synthetic biological intelligence and organoid intelligence - Frontiers, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2024.1542629/full
36. (PDF) Brain organoids and organoid intelligence from ethical, legal, and social points of view - ResearchGate, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377383104_Brain_organoids_and_organoid_intelligence_from_ethical_legal_and_social_points_of_view
37. Powered by Human Brain Cells: Cortical Labs CL-1 Biocomputer - Mike Kalil, accessed April 26, 2025, https://mikekalil.com/blog/cortical-labs-brain-computer/
38. Integrating Hybrid Systems, Biocomputing, Neural Networks, and Machine Learning, for Advanced Neurotechnology, accessed April 26, 2025, https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/33951/1/2407.11939v3.pdf
39. Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research ... - Frontiers, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2024.1376042/full
40. Swiss Startup Sets Out to Develop the World's First Living Processor - All About Circuits, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/news/swiss-startup-finalspark-sets-out-develop-worlds-first-living-processor/
41. Neuroplatform - FinalSpark, accessed April 26, 2025, https://finalspark.com/neuroplatform/
42. Engineered biological neural networks as basic logic operators - bioRxiv, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2024/12/23/2024.12.23.630065.full.pdf
43. Import AI, accessed April 26, 2025, https://jack-clark.net/
44. FinalSpark's Neuroplatform: the era of organic computing has begun ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://bioalps.org/finalsparks-neuroplatform-the-era-of-organic-computing-has-begun/
45. The Rise of Wetware Computers: A Glimpse into the Future Market, accessed April 26, 2025, https://prasadshinde0077.stck.me/post/257151/The-Rise-of-Wetware-Computers-A-Glimpse-into-the-Future-Market
46. Cellular Computing - ResearchGate, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365769686_Cellular_Computing
47. Computational capabilities of a multicellular reservoir computing system - PMC, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10079015/
48. Advances in the Development and Application of Human Organoids - PubMed Central, accessed April 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11775963/
49. Condensation of Algorithmic Supremacy Claims - PhilArchive, accessed April 26, 2025, https://philarchive.org/archive/ALICOA
50. Organoid research breakthroughs in 2024: A review - AccScience Publishing, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.accscience.com/journal/OR/articles/online_first/4838
51. Breakthrough in scalable production of high-quality organoids - ScienceDaily, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241125125830.htm
52. World's first bioprocessor uses 16 human brain organoids for 'a ..., accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/worlds-first-bioprocessor-uses-16-human-brain-organoids-for-a-million-times-less-power-consumption-than-a-digital-chip
53. Biological Applications of Emergent Information Processing: Fast, Long- Range Synchronization - Preprints.org, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.preprints.org/frontend/manuscript/e379d6f73a1bb793e8800a82a42e7821/download_pub
54. Genetic designs for stochastic and probabilistic biocomputing - bioRxiv, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.22.586310v1.full.pdf
55. Beyond Consciousness: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Human Brain Organoid Research and Application | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387253418_Beyond_Consciousness_Ethical_Legal_and_Social_Issues_in_Human_Brain_Organoid_Research_and_Application

#OrganoidIntelligence

#Neuroscience

#BioTech

#AIInnovation

#EmergingTech

#CuttingEdgeScience

#FutureOfComputing

#ScienceAndTech

#BrainOrganoids

#MedicalBreakthrough

#FuturisticTech

#TechTrends

#DisruptiveInnovation

#BiotechResearch

#NextGenTechnology

#wetware-as-a-service