Lower rates could boost the case for real estate
Bottom line up top
While the scales may be tipped in favor of equity markets… Strong second quarter earnings, optimism for a minimal impact of higher tariffs on consumer inflation and heightened expectations for U.S. Federal Reserve rate cuts helped power the S&P 500 Index to three record-high closes last week. If the +11.7% earnings growth rate (as of 13 Aug 2025) holds up, it would mark the third consecutive quarter of double-digit year-over-year earnings gains for the index — far exceeding forecasts of just +4.9% on 30 June, based on FactSet data. Further underscoring bullish sentiment, more than half of index stocks are trading above their 50- and 200-day moving averages. And fund manager allocations to global equities are at their largest overweight of the past six months, according to one industry survey. Despite genuine downside risks, including a possible reacceleration of inflation and a weakening labor market, along with a crowded artificial intelligence (AI) trade that has led to stretched valuations and narrow market leadership, investor euphoria continues to define the trajectory for equities.
…the Fed is compelled to maintain its balancing act. Investors were elated to see another monthly Consumer Price Index report showing little evidence of increased tariffs driving up inflation. Notably in July, shelter costs — one of the stickiest components of CPI — trended below 4% for the fifth month in a row. This is the first time it has held this level in approximately five years (Figure 1). The bloom came off the rose, however, after July’s Producer Price Index was released the next day, with both headline and core PPI coming in much hotter than forecasts and sharply higher than the prior month’s readings. PPI measures wholesale price movements, and some key components feed into the Fed’s preferred inflation barometer, the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, due later this month. Amid a mixed inflation outlook and worsening employment data, markets now anticipate two, rather than three, Fed rate cuts of 25 basis points (bps) between now and the end of 2025, beginning in September. A combined 50 bps reduction in the target fed funds rate by year-end, to a range of 3.75%-4.0%, would put it at its lowest level since November 2022. This could bolster a rate-sensitive sector like commercial real estate, making it a worthy candidate for a potential portfolio allocation.
Portfolio considerations
Following two years of declines, global private real estate returns have been positive for the past four quarters, amid diminishing headwinds for the asset class. Rebounding real estate prices in most global markets, rising transaction volumes and a sharp drop in new-construction activity have all contributed. Transaction volume has exceeded $1 trillion dollars over the past year, with stabilizing levels in the Asia Pacific region after a period of weakness, along with investment volume picking up in both the U.S. and Europe. With real estate at a turning point, in our view, we continue to favor a global cities approach that emphasizes growing markets with educated and diverse populations.
The next cycle has seemingly begun for U.S. real estate. In the history of the U.S. core open-end real estate fund industry, there have been three major cycles, each of which lasted 12+ years and generated total returns of 10%+ annually (based on the NCREIF Fund Index – Open-End Diversified Core Equity). Historically, two consecutive quarters of positive total returns have indicated the start of the next cycle. Core real estate has now produced four (Figure 2). Additionally, in this cycle the number of new projects has dropped significantly across property sectors, and next year deliveries are expected to be at their lowest level in more than a decade. These dynamics bode well for future real estate fundamentals.
Within the U.S. market, we continue to favor the medical office and retail sectors. Medical office occupancy is at a cyclical high of 93%, with demand outpacing supply for 17 straight quarters. Construction starts are at just 53% of peak levels, setting up a medical office supply shortage in the coming years. Within retail, grocery-anchored shopping centers are particularly strong, as occupancy rates are elevated and new supply is nearly nonexistent. Prospects for future growth remain favorable and may surprise to the upside as vacancies remain below their historical average.
Asia Pacific: Medium-term growth fundamentals and long-term structural trends. In Tokyo, multifamily rents are expected to stay on an upward trajectory, underpinned not only by sustained leasing demand, but also by constrained new supply. South Korea continues to emerge as a potential market for rental housing opportunities. A shift in residential leasing practices should be a positive going forward. In Australia, grocery anchored neighborhood shopping centers look attractive, supported by attractive initial yields, the country’s long-term population growth and a tight retail supply pipeline.
For more information, please visit nuveen.com.
Endnotes
Sources All market and economic data from Bloomberg, FactSet and Morningstar. This material is not intended to be a recommendation or investment advice, does not constitute a solicitation to buy, sell or hold a security or an investment strategy, and is not provided in a fiduciary capacity. The information provided does not take into account the specific objectives or circumstances of any particular investor, or suggest any specific course of action. Investment decisions should be made based on an investor’s objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her financial professionals. The views and opinions expressed are for informational and educational purposes only as of the date of production/writing and may change without notice at any time based on numerous factors, such as market or other conditions, legal and regulatory developments, additional risks and uncertainties and may not come to pass. This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections, forecasts, estimates of market returns, and proposed or expected portfolio composition. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the information presented herein by way of example. Performance data shown represents past performance and does not predict or guarantee future results. Investing involves risk; principal loss is possible. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. For term definitions and index descriptions, please access the glossary on nuveen.com. Please note, it is not possible to invest directly in an index. Important information on risk All investments carry a certain degree of risk and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. Equity investing involves risk. Investments are also subject to political, currency and regulatory risks. These risks may be magnified in emerging markets. A focus on dividend-paying securities presents the risks of greater exposure to certain economic sectors. Dividend yield is one component of performance and should not be the only consideration for investment. Equity investments are subject to market risk, active management risk, and growth stock risk; dividends are not guaranteed. Non-U.S. investments involve additional risks, including currency fluctuation, political and economic instability, lack of liquidity and differing legal and accounting standards. These risks are magnified in emerging markets. The use of derivatives involves additional risk and transaction costs. It is important to review your investment objectives, risk tolerance and liquidity needs before choosing an investment style or manager. Because infrastructure portfolios concentrate their investments in infrastructure-related securities, portfolios have greater exposure to adverse economic, regulatory, political, legal, and other changes affecting the issuers of such securities. Infrastructure-related businesses are subject to a variety of factors that may adversely affect their business or operations, including high interest costs in connection with capital construction programs, costs associated with environmental and other regulations, the effects of economic slowdown and surplus capacity, increased competition from other providers of services, uncertainties concerning the availability of fuel at reasonable prices, the effects of energy conservation policies and other factors. Additionally, infrastructure related entities may be subject to regulation by various governmental authorities and may also be affected by governmental regulation of rates charged to customers, service interruption and/or legal challenges due to environmental, operational or other mishaps and the imposition of special tariffs and changes in tax laws, regulatory policies and accounting
NYU SPS Schack REIT Investment Fund, consider this insight: "...within the U.S. market, we continue to favor the medical office and retail sectors".
Great breakdown—feels like Powell’s walking a tightrope with no net. My bet? A cautious tone, leaning hawkish unless data gives clear cover. Eyes on those PMIs!
Assistant Vice President, Wealth Management Associate
1moGreat analysis, Saira
Turning, vision into value💭 – A Hard Truth for Traders 💸 "If you focus on what you could make, you will be tempted..." – Warren Buffett Tempted to oversize, chase, ignore your stop, trade from greed instead of logic...
1moFantastic breakdown, Saira. Powell’s balancing act between inflation and growth is getting trickier by the day. With PMI and housing data pulling in opposite directions, the Jackson Hole tone could be the most pivotal in years. My guess? He stays data-dependent but leans slightly hawkish to keep credibility intact. Curious to hear your take—does sticky inflation risk outweigh labor softness at this stage?
HR & Total Rewards Leader | M&A | Connecting AI, HR & Finance | Simplifying the Complex | Maximizing Value | HR Transformation | People Operations & Technology | HRIS | Corporate | PE | Startups | Advisor | Board Member
1moPowell’s playlist might need a full Fed-themed mixtape at this rate, Saira. With PMI and housing data sending mixed signals, it feels like policymakers are navigating a foggy crossroads. If Powell leans hawkish, could it risk further chilling the housing market? Or might a dovish pivot spark concerns about inflation resilience? These are the days of our lives.