ONE – looking like Maersk/PONL merger

ONE – looking like Maersk/PONL merger

ONE Line just revised their profit outlook downwards from a positive 110M USD to a negative 600M USD for fiscal year 2018. Not only is this a very dramatic adjustment, but it also appears to bear a strong resemblance to the integration between Maersk and P&O Nedlloyd in 2006.

Amongst the explanations for the adjustment, ONE states the following: “Booking reception and documentation operations were delayed because ONE staff were not completely familiarized with the newly introduced IT system, and the staff were shorthanded. This caused significant inconvenience for customers.

Compare this with the following statement made by Maersk in their annual accounts for 2006: “Volumes did not reach expectations. Maersk Line lost market shares. This was primarily due to difficulties related to the implementation of a number of comprehensive IT systems simultaneously with integration of P&O Nedlloyd, including the merger of the global service network

ONE’s current fleet size is 1,5 million TEU and they project a loss of 600M USD. In 2006, Maersk Line had a fleet size of 1,6 million TEU and suffered a loss of 568M USD. The similarity is striking. (but also note that Maersk did eventually bounce back and emerge stronger than ever - therefore ONE's current problems might also be temporary)

ONE states that the problems are resolved, but the effects in terms of getting booking levels back up takes time.

This means that ONE is being hit by a double-whammy. They will be faced with the same problems as the rest of the industry wherein fuel price increases are difficult to fully pass on. At the same time they will have missed out on the strongest peak in many years on the Transpacific eastbound trade.

This is of course all very unfortunate for ONE line, but it also raises another important point. If ONE is indeed successful in regaining the lost ground this means challenges for some of the other carriers. Other carriers will have experienced stronger than expected volume growth in 2018, capitalizing on ONE’s losses. That is only natural. But it similarly means that if ONE is able to regain “their” volumes, it will negatively impact other carriers in 2019.

William Sedgwick

Maersk Project Logistics (formerly Martin Bencher)

6y

The difference between 2006 and 2018 is the market and the increases in fuel, in 2006 the market was strong enough for Maersk to still have an impact, and the fuel surcharges were not what they are today, plus in 2006 Maersk was in a very strong position ahead of the rest of the field, with a way back....things may not be as clear cut 12 years down the line, increases in surcharges and share in market not as strong....its a very steep hill to climb.

Like
Reply
Iris Licona Urbizo

| Consulting | Advisory | Asian Markets

6y

Patricia Perez Salazar Juan Camilo Anzola - interesting read!

Greg Howard

President at Howie's Spiked

6y

deja vu

If ONE really wants to come back in Business, they should really look for opportunities in setting up shared services of their own and use the capabilities. The success of Maersk to bounce back lies in their strategy of adding more power steadily in shared services set up.

Like
Reply
Graeme (Chalky) White

Director- UK HSE & Technical Training ( Security & Facilities Southampton) Ports & Terminals - Energetic, positive, and influential Learning & Leadership Development Expert with a passion for driving culture change.

6y

Your looking good Lars, need to catch up soon! Chalky

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics