Our Lives are Full of Dilemmas
A colleague from the United States recently reached out to discuss some challenges he was facing with the production of laminated products. One of the first things he mentioned was, "Here in the States, we generally use stronger flour than you do in Europe, and we also use bar mixers instead of spiral mixers. So, any solution we come up with should take this into account." Our conversation turned into a deep dive into the differences between these two mixing techniques, and I thought it would be interesting to outline the key advantages of these two methods for you.
The Spiral Mixer: A Revolution in Dough Mixing
Spiral mixers, which have become the dominant technology in Europe, were designed to replicate the gentle, natural process of kneading dough by hand. With a spiral-shaped tool that pushes and stretches the dough against the bowl, this mixer achieves highly effective gluten development with minimal heat generation. This is critical for maintaining dough integrity, particularly in high-quality artisan breads and delicate pastry products.
One of the main strengths of spiral mixers is their ability to handle a wide variety of dough types. Whether it’s a highly hydrated ciabatta dough or a firmer pan bread mix, the spiral action works efficiently to produce a uniform, well-developed dough. This versatility makes the spiral mixer a favorite in European bakeries, both large and small.
Additionally, spiral mixers tend to mix dough faster than other types, offering significant time savings. They’re particularly adept at maintaining low dough temperatures during mixing, a crucial factor for preventing premature fermentation, which can impact product quality. This makes them ideal for doughs that are sensitive to temperature changes, such as those used in artisan bread production.
However, while spiral mixers have become the standard in Europe, they have faced obstacles in breaking into the U.S. market. Early spiral mixers imported to the States struggled to handle the high-protein, strong flours typically used in American bakeries. High torque demands led to broken shafts, snapped tools, and other mechanical failures, causing U.S. bakers to remain loyal to their tried-and-tested bar mixers.
The Bar (Horizontal) Mixer: A U.S. Standard for Industrial Scale
In contrast to the spiral mixer’s gentle kneading, bar mixers, also known as horizontal mixers, offer a more robust mechanical action, with a horizontal shaft mixing the dough. These mixers are extremely popular in the United States, especially in large-scale industrial bakeries that require high production capacity. Bar mixers are known for their durability and ability to handle large batches of dough at once, making them the go-to choice for high-volume operations.
One of the main reasons bar mixers are preferred in the U.S. is the nature of American flour. Flour in the United States often has a higher protein content, which results in stronger gluten development and requires more torque during mixing. Bar mixers are built to withstand the heavy-duty demands of this flour, and their larger batch capacities help meet the high production needs of many U.S. bakeries.
Another advantage of bar mixers is their compatibility with existing dough handling systems. Many bakeries in the U.S. have invested heavily in horizontal mixing setups, making the switch to vertical or spiral mixing systems more costly and logistically difficult. Additionally, bar mixers are better suited for environments where automation and large-scale production are prioritized over small, frequent batches.
However, there are downsides to bar mixers, particularly when it comes to temperature control. The more aggressive mixing action of bar mixers tends to generate more heat, which can negatively affect dough quality, especially in more sensitive doughs. In some cases, this excess heat can lead to overmixing or premature fermentation, making temperature management a crucial factor in using bar mixers effectively.
The Impact of Automation and Advanced Systems
In recent years, both spiral and bar mixers have seen significant advancements, particularly with the introduction of automation in mixing processes.
European bakeries have embraced fully automated bowl handling systems, such as carousel or robotic systems, which allow for more frequent, smaller batches without sacrificing efficiency. These systems are often paired with spiral mixers and offer the flexibility to accommodate different dough types and production cycles.
In the U.S., automation has also become more common in bar mixer setups, although the focus remains on maintaining large batch sizes and meeting high production demands.
Some American bakeries have begun to explore spiral mixer technology in combination with advanced automation systems, which could eventually narrow the gap between the two methods.
Choosing Between Spiral and Bar Mixers
Ultimately, the choice between spiral and bar mixers comes down to the specific needs of a bakery. For artisan or smaller-scale bakeries that prioritize dough quality, consistency, and versatility, spiral mixers offer a clear advantage. They are ideal for creating products with a refined crumb structure, where gluten development and temperature control are essential.
On the other hand, for large-scale industrial bakeries that require high production capacity and the ability to mix large batches of dough, bar mixers remain the preferred option. Their durability and ability to handle the demands of American flour make them an indispensable part of U.S. dough production.
In conclusion, both mixing technologies have their strengths and are suited to different baking environments. Whether it's the fine-tuned gluten development of a spiral mixer or the robust production capacity of a bar mixer, understanding the benefits of each technology allows bakers to make informed decisions based on their specific production needs.
Thanks for reading✨📚
General Manager & Head of Product Development Olam Agri Grains: Ghana 🇬🇭 -Burkina Fasso 🇧🇫 -Togo 🇹🇬 -Benin 🇧🇯 -Niger 🇳🇪
9moIf you’re focused on dough quality and fine details, spiral mixers are the best choice. However, if the goal is large-scale production and speed, Bar mixers are more suitable.
Supervisor planta en Bimbo Ecuador
11moPara la primera podemos decir que estos equipos han ido evolucionando y el desarrollo del gluten es lento. En la actualidad se han incorporado chaquetas de frío para reducir la temperatura de la masa, por el tiempo extendido, tiene una menor capacidad. Para la segunda amasadora que es de mayor capacidad no maltrata el gluten durante su desarrollo, por el tiempo de mezclado que es alto estos equipos constan con sistemas de refrigeración para reducir la temperatura de masa la cual se incrementa por la transferencia de fricción dentro de la mezcladora.
Food Technologist
11moSpiral mixers have been a game-changer for dough consistency in my experience, especially for artisan bread. Looking forward to learning more about the advantages of each and how they impact dough quality. Thanks in advance
Head Manufacturing Pasta Division at Honeywell Flour Mills Plc
11moWhat about planetary mixers? How do they compare with spiral?
Quality Specialist at GRAINAR
11moVery informative