Performance Management - 360 Degree approach - How effective is this?

To start with , reason Organisations choose “360 Degree” approach for evaluating the yearly performance., is majorly due to the effective elements it includes: 

• Self-Assessment 

• Constructive Feedback ( listing the Strengths and areas to improve)

• Evaluation on basis of Values of the Organisation and Behavioural aspects

• Multi-perspective (Includes internal and external sources which are not directly aligned with your work)

Anonymity being one of the important factor while conducting this approach

PROS:  The system can be quite effective for identifying development opportunities and gaining a comprehensive view of an employee's performance, as they gather feedback from multiple sources like peers, supervisors, subordinates, and even self-assessment, but their effectiveness depends heavily on proper implementation and addressing potential issues like bias and anonymity concerns; while they can provide valuable insights, they may not always be suitable for strict performance ranking or decision-making alone. 

From Employee perspective, it can be a game changer as it provides below approaches:

• Improved communication: Encourages open feedback and communication within teams. 

• Holistic perspective: Provides feedback from various angles, offering a more complete picture of an employee's strengths and weaknesses. 

• Development focus: Primarily used to identify areas for improvement and personal growth. 

• Increased self-awareness: Employees gain insight into how their actions are perceived by others. 

• Accountability: Can hold managers accountable by allowing upward feedback from subordinates. 

CONS: In scenario where a proper and effective implementation is not carried out, 360 Degree can have:

• Potential for bias i.e. Feedback may be influenced by personal relationships or biases among reviewers. 

• Conflicting feedback: Different perspectives may lead to contradictory feedback, making interpretation challenging. 

• Anonymity concerns: Employees might hesitate to give honest negative feedback if their identity is not protected. 

• Administrative burden: Can be time-consuming to implement and manage effectively. 

• Not suitable for strict ranking: May not be the best method for making absolute performance comparisons between employees. Therefore the key lies in the Proper and effective implementation of the Performance appraisal systems

Therefore the key lies in the Proper and effective implementation of the Performance appraisal systems

#performanceappraisal #performancemanagement #corporate #selfassessments #360approach #increments #feedback #Manager #Performancework