Personality Debate: Who Does It Better? Introverts vs Extroverts in the Workplace

Personality Debate: Who Does It Better? Introverts vs Extroverts in the Workplace

Every industry, every company, every team has its blatant mix of personalities. There are the loud, bubbly firecrackers who can turn a Monday morning meeting into a pep rally. And there are the quiet strategists who says less, but when they do speak, the whole room shifts.

These aren't just workplace quirks. As a matter of fact, research shows that blending introverts and extroverts makes teams smarter, stronger, and more effective. But why?

The Science of Personality at Work:

Sales success isn’t one-sided. Wharton professor Adam Grant found that ambiverts (people with a balance of introversion and extroversion) outsell introverts by 24% and extroverts by 32%. You know why? They know when to listen and when to push. It's that strategic balance that creates both trust and momentum.

Leadership effectiveness depends on the team. A study of 130 pizza stores showed that extroverted leaders drove 16% higher profits when employees were passive. But when employees were proactive, introverted leaders outperformed extroverts by 14–24%. The best leadership style depends on who is being led.

Biases creep into peer reviews. Research from Oregon State University revealed that introverts consistently rated extroverted coworkers lower, even when actual performance was equal. This is an important reminder that personality can unconsciously shape career outcomes, unless organizations build fairer feedback systems.

The brain literally works differently. Introverts show more gray matter in the prefrontal cortex (the region tied to planning and decision-making). Extroverts, on the other hand, thrive in environments with higher stimulation. Neither is “better,” they’re just wired differently, and that diversity fuels resilience.

Why Any Of This Matters:

When extroverts bring energy and connection, and introverts bring reflection and depth, teams that posses the ability to mesh get the best of both worlds. So, instead of trying to “fix” or mold people, great organizations create conditions for both to thrive. It’s less about choosing a side, and more about designing workplaces that let different kinds of brilliance work side by side.

So tell me: Are you more of the quiet strategist or the loud spark? Or maybe, like me, somewhere in between?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories