Reimagining Patient Care: Why HCAHPS Surveys Are Outdated and Detrimental
In an era defined by advancements in technology
When the HCAHPS surveys were introduced, they aimed to improve the quality of care
Moreover, the pressure to perform well on HCAHPS scores has led to a phenomenon known as "survey-centric care
The competitive nature of healthcare has also introduced an unfortunate incentive to 'game' the system. Hospitals, seeking to secure higher reimbursement rates or attract more patients, may resort to tactics that artificially inflate survey results. This can include selective surveying, cherry-picking patients who are likely to give positive feedback, or even coaching patients on how to answer to boost scores. As a result, the authenticity of HCAHPS results comes into question, undermining the credibility of the entire survey system.
Finances cannot be overlooked. The exorbitant cost to pay to vendors to manage HCAHPS compliance is money not spent on making the patient's experience better. These sunk costs are mandated by CMS, obligating organizations large and small to pay top dollar to measure a metric they cannot afford to improve. In the post COVID world, measurement is still a requirement, but staff shortages and budgetary cutbacks are creating a no-win situation for a large percentage of organizations.
Furthermore, the delayed nature of HCAHPS feedback is problematic. By the time patients are surveyed, their memories of the care they received may have faded, and their responses might not accurately reflect their real-time experiences. Healthcare facilities need to be able to identify and address issues promptly to ensure patient satisfaction and safety. Relying on feedback that may be months old hampers this responsiveness.
A shift towards a more holistic and patient-centric approach is long overdue. To truly enhance the patient experience, healthcare providers should embrace real-time feedback mechanisms
Rather than focusing solely on satisfaction scores, healthcare facilities should concentrate on patient-centered care that emphasizes open communication, shared decision-making, and personalized attention. Investing in staff training, empathetic communication, and streamlining processes can have a far more significant impact on patient experience than striving for higher HCAHPS scores.
The HCAHPS surveys, while well-intentioned, have become an outdated and potentially counterproductive tool for measuring patient experience. They encourage a shallow understanding of patient care, promote a survey-centric approach, and lack the real-time responsiveness needed in modern healthcare. To truly enhance patient experiences, healthcare providers should transition towards more adaptable, patient-focused feedback systems that prioritize individualized care and authentic communication. It's time to move beyond the limitations of HCAHPS and embark on a new era of patient-centered excellence
Listening leader, measuring what matters
2yYes. Yes. Yes. Unfortunately, when leader compensation is connected to HCAHPS performance, it’s easy to become hyper focused on the number. Is it up? Down? Green? Red? People can tend to lose sight of whether or not movement is normal, predictable variation or special cause variation. Worse, they can forget about the faces, souls and stories behind the numbers. We must equip teams to engage in real time experience conversations and empower them to act to both favorable and unfavorable feedback.
I help others remove the mask and show to the world 🌍 the real, imperfect, flawed, unique, and beautiful person they are. | Dare to Be Genuine
2yI appreciate this post. I can’t help but think that maybe it is the former survey administrator in me that wants to speak to the difference in satisfaction and experience. As I read through the article I heard “satisfaction.” One of the things that I have taught my teams especially those on the clinical side is that it is possible to leave the hospital not being totally satisfied but still having a good experience. I do believe you make some very valid points and like most things that get spread to the masses by the government their are bound to be some flaws, which I don’t think the CAHPS consortium is looking to address or even thinking about. These line was one that I think we have to land on and make every effort to fight for: “A shift towards a more holistic and patient-centric approach is long overdue.” “It's time to move beyond the limitations of HCAHPS and embark on a new era of patient-centered excellence.”
CEO at River View Eye Specialists & River View Surgery Center
2yGreat article. We have definitely complicated a simple task of just listening to our patients.
Making a Ruckus That Makes a Difference in Healthcare
2yAh, Paul, you know I appreciated this post 😊 I said YES! more than once as I read what you shared. YES, to your statement of “One of the primary shortcomings lies in their standardized nature, which fails to capture the nuances of individual patient experiences.” As Sheila Malony and TPR say, “Surveys tell us about patients like this, not about this patient.” These surveys also fail to capture insights from all demographics. We are listening only to a subset of our patient population. And then we don’t really listen to them either… YES, to your statement of “The pressure to perform well on HCAHPS scores has led to a phenomenon known as ‘survey-centric care.’ Instead of focusing on genuine patient needs, some healthcare providers prioritize actions that yield better survey scores.” AND many may be unintentionally doing so as this is the only feedback they are collecting and responding to. They are trapped in the belief that CAHPS survey provides the correct insights for action. YES, to the cost paid to vendors to manage the survey process. Vendors who are making large profits.
Executive Director advancing health education in Northern California | Data Storytelling & Communications Coach for nonprofit and healthcare leaders
2yLove this. You make some excellent points Paul. I think the survey centric behaviors and gaming the system and financial incentives have become way too much the focus with the surveys. I personally don’t think HCAHPS itself is all bad, though I agree it is standardized, it does give us a baseline of comparison. I think we should rethink the questions to incorporate aspects that we know are significant, but not being tapped. And then we need to empower the people who get that information to act on their insights in the best interest of their patient.