Rush for US gas plants drives up costs, lead times
Source: Wood Mackenzie, April 2025

Rush for US gas plants drives up costs, lead times

This week, we delve inside the boom in new U.S. gas-fired power plants, where supply shortages are reining in deployment rates. Also below, Trump's finalized tax bill culls clean power tax credits, Google signs American hydroelectric power deal and the UK extends clean power support contracts to 20 years.

We hope you enjoy this edition, please forward this to your colleagues and join the conversation!

Rush for US gas plants drives up costs, lead times

Gas power plant development is surging on the back of the AI boom, leading to a supply squeeze and prompting closer partnerships with manufacturers and construction groups.

Surging demand for power from AI and electrification has led to a flurry of new gas-fired power projects in the United States, following years of inactivity.

"It's been 40 or 50 years, or so, since we've seen demand grow the way it's growing and is expected to grow,” Robert Gaudette, president of NRG Energy's business and wholesale operations, told Reuters Events.

"AI is obviously a big part of that, but you've also got reshoring of manufacturing, you've got more electrification,” Gaudette added.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) hiked its forecast for U.S. electricity retail sales in June, predicting commercial power demand will grow by 3% in 2025 and 5% in 2026.

Solar, wind and battery storage have dominated U.S. power installations in recent years but data centers require power day and night, increasing the demand for gas-fired power and nuclear power.

“You cannot run a system fully on renewables, you need some level of backup and gas is the reliable backup at this point, until we get energy storage at long durations at low cost,” Humayun Tai, Senior Partner and global co-leader of McKinsey’s Global Energy & Materials and Electric Power & Natural Gas practices, told Reuters Events.

Over 100 GW of new gas-fired projects have been announced, Jay Kim, Associate Partner at McKinsey, said. Not including small projects and those without completion dates, around 120 gas-fired plants are planned by 2030 for a total capacity of around 80 GW.

"To put that number in perspective, over the last five years the U.S. added only about 35 GW of gas," Kim said. "So, it's almost triple what it was."

Join 3,000+ senior decision-makers across energy and finance at Reuters Events Energy LIVE 2025.

The surge of new plant projects has squeezed supply and construction resources, leading to longer lead times and higher costs.

The turbine supply market for U.S. gas-fired plants is dominated by three large original equipment manufacturers (OEMs): GE Vernova, Siemens Energy and Mitsubishi Power. Manufacturers are starting to invest in new capacity, but market participants are reporting longer lead times as suppliers struggle to meet surging demand.

“It can be five plus years for most of the major OEMs” to deliver large [gas] turbines, Bobby Noble, senior program manager at EPRI, a non-profit energy research and development organization, told Reuters Events.

Smaller gas turbines can be attained in three-to-four years, he said.

Supply shortage

The last surge in gas-fired plant construction came between 2000 and 2010 after the U.S. shale revolution lowered gas prices.

The addition of new capacity and growing renewable energy output led to an extended period of low profit margins and a near halt in the construction of new plants. A lack of projects led to component suppliers slowing investment plans or exiting the sector, leaving the industry unable to respond to the current surge in demand.

"Driven by record demand for gas turbines, lead times are increasing, despite our capacity expansion,” a Siemens Energy spokesperson said in a statement.

Siemens' expansion plans include a 61,000-square-foot expansion of its Gibsonton, Florida manufacturing facility which makes blades and vanes, crucial components in gas turbines.

Meanwhile, GE Vernova plans to invest more than $160 million in its Greenville plant in South Carolina to meet surging turbine demand.

The geographic spread of new gas-fired power projects is closely correlated with new data center projects. Availability of grid capacity has become a key driver of project location as developers seek to minimize lengthy connection queues exacerbated by a large number of projects submitted to grid operators.

US planned gas-fired power installations

Article content
Source: Wood Mackenzie, April 2025

Of the 80 GW of projects being tracked by McKinsey, 25 GW comes from vertically integrated utilities securing their own needs, and there is about 15 GW each planned in the PJM, ERCOT and MISO wholesale markets, Kim said. The PJM market covers Mid-Atlantic and Midwest areas, ERCOT covers Texas and MISO spans Midwest and central southern regions.

Construction costs

Gas-fired power plant developers also face higher costs than in previous booms due to an exit of construction companies as well as wider inflationary pressures exacerbated by import tariffs.

Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) companies exited the sector during the period of tepid demand and there is currently a shortage of construction companies that can “comfortably build these gas plants,” Kim said.

Download our exclusive report: US Energy Strategies Under Trump 2.0

The lack of both construction and manufacturing capacity have led to a “huge uptick” in the cost of building gas-fired plants, Kim said.

“For a long time, it used to be a rule of thumb that it was about $1,000 per kilowatt to build a gas plant, and now it's about $2,000 to $2,500 per kilowatt,” he said.

Some developers are partnering with EPCs and equipment suppliers to reduce construction risks and secure their pipeline of projects.

In February, NRG Energy announced a partnership with GE Vernova and construction company Kiewit Corp to build four new natural gas-fired power plants to serve the ERCOT and PJM markets.

It is extremely challenging to secure components and labor resources, Gaudette said.

Even if you had unlimited funds "you're still talking in the next decade before you're [in commercial operation],” he said.

For early access to energy insights, sign up to our newsletter.

NRG is "uniquely positioned because of our [GE Vernova], Kiewit agreement, and we know we've got the skilled labor to put down about 5.4 GW of natural gas generation with GE and Kiewit as our EPC over the 2029-to-2032-time frame,” Gaudette said.

“We also have agreed to a standard package,” he added. “So, we're going to, you know, cookie cutter these things and we'll learn each time and get better every time, and all three players benefit."

Reporting by Mark Shenk

Editing by Robin Sayles

Other major news in energy...

Trump's Big Beautiful Bill shrinks solar, wind tax credits

U.S. President Donald Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill slashes tax credits for solar and wind energy projects but mostly retains benefits for energy storage, geothermal and nuclear investors.

Google signs 3 GW hydropower deal

Google has signed a 20-year deal with Brookfield Asset Management to secure up to 3 GW of hydroelectric power for its U.S. operations.

UK extends clean power contracts to 20 years

The UK government will extend the term of renewable energy offtake agreements to 20 years from 15 years amid efforts to boost clean power deployment.

Iberdrola, Masdar to develop 1.4 GW offshore wind farm in UK

Spain’s energy giant Iberdrola and Abu Dhabi's state-owned renewable energy company Masdar will invest 5.2 billion euros ($6.1 billion) in an offshore wind farm in Britain, the companies said on July 10.

New York shelves offshore wind transmission project

New York state has canceled a transmission project to deliver up to 8 GW of offshore wind energy to the grid, citing President Trump’s decision to halt offshore wind leasing and permitting.


To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories