Should freelancers name and shame clients for overdue invoices?
Scrolling through LinkedIn recently, I’ve noticed something that you may have noticed too – more freelancers are publicly naming and shaming their clients for overdue invoices. Even tagging the companies responsible. It’s provocative, it’s public – and it’s becoming more common, on my feed at least.
So, what’s going on here? Is the freelance community feeling more empowered, or just more desperate?
As always, it’s complicated
As someone who campaigns against late payments, the quiet sense of admiration I feel in reading posts like these is quickly followed by sympathy and even discomfort.
The frustration behind the naming and shaming is entirely justified. Because when you’re a freelancer, an overdue invoice can easily cascade into a series of financial problems.
It can suddenly mean you’re unable to renew an important licence or qualification that you need for work; that means turning down work until it’s sorted; and that means opportunity cost and lower income… repeat this too many times and you can find yourself in debt, or just giving the freelance dream up altogether. All this, because a firm with a much bigger bank account couldn’t just get that couple of grand out the door on time.
When these are the stakes, you can see why freelancers are resorting to going public with the issue.
At IPSE, we regularly hear from freelancers whose invoices are ignored or endlessly delayed, for one reason or another. Some of them ask whether they should be naming and shaming the offending party. The impulse is understandable, and it’s clearly a line they’re reluctant to even consider crossing – because it’s not without risk.
Going public might prompt a long-overdue payment, but it can just as easily shut down dialogue altogether. It could prompt legal threats if the poster didn’t choose their words carefully. And it could put off prospective clients who see it as a red flag, regardless of the circumstances; that might be no great loss for some, but it could be detrimental to others.
Ultimately, the professional consequences are unpredictable, and that’s why IPSE has never recommended this approach to any individual who asks.
But when a client continuously delays, ignores and avoids paying money that a freelancer has earned and desperately needs, you can see why it feels like calling them out online is the only choice they have.
What’s most interesting to me is that it feels freelancers are talking less about late payment ‘culture’ in the abstract, and more about the individuals reputedly carrying it out.
Going by the book
Freelancers aren’t a homogenous group though, and there will be differing opinions on whether speaking out is the right thing to do. Following the debate online, some have highlighted the success they’ve had resolving payment issues in the Small Claims Court. That’s the official ‘last resort’, and there’s a specific procedure to follow, which we explain in our guide.
But instances of ‘speaking out’ indicate a lack of faith in the ‘official’ apparatus. That’s why we’ll keep pushing for stronger regulation, faster payments and better support. Our manifesto for the self-employed made a couple of recommendations to MPs:
Ultimately, we think the UK should be aiming for a standard commercial payment term of 30 days. The government’s Fair Payment Code is home to plenty of businesses who are up to that standard already, so it can be done.
A fair warning to clients
The traditional thinking has been that, in the world of business, things go wrong sometimes. Freelancers will have clients that treat them poorly – that’s business. But more freelancers seem to be pushing back on the idea that they should stay silent about it.
We’d never suggest that going public is the right option for everyone. Even I personally still don’t know about public call outs. But it’s happening. We’ve taken note, and clients should too: paying on time really is worth it. And when that can’t be done – because sometimes, things do just go wrong – then engaging in open, honest and proactive dialogue about the situation will go a long way to ease the tension.
But dialogue must be followed by action. Because when freelancers speak out, it’s not because they’re itching for a fight online – it’s because they’ve totally lost faith in what their client is telling them.
IPSE could be pulling together a 'league table' on a portal somewhere. List companies that your members have notified you they are having problems with - rated by number of problems. That way, some level of anonymity remains - companies can get in touch with yourselves to challenge their position on the league table directly, rather than publicly, if they prefer. This may not help your members with their direct dispute anymore than the actions they are currently taking (directly 'naming-and-shaming, or legal action) but it does flag to your members any potential clients that are not good payers.
This kind of thing is what The Micro Business Alliance was set up for, and what Tony Robinson OBE , Ian Farrar Becky Lodge BA (Hons) FRSA and a few others are endeavouring to challenge. Perhaps if there is a pattern of a particular client being bad for this, then it should be referred to them to consider some form of class action
Keeping marketing human in a digital world | Helping brands build trust, raise profile, and get results that matter.
1moVery timely, I put a post on this week discussing why late payments aren't just about the cash but I would not 'name and shame', it's more about highlighting the issue and the wider impact it has, especially on micro businesses.
I make freelancing in L&D less scary - offering community, support and business know-how.
1moIt's a super personal choice everyone has to make for themselves because naming and shaming can go a heck of a lot deeper than just a frustrated LinkedIn post. You have to weigh up all the pros and cons, not just from the delayed payment but to your reputation. I've known people just not chase the payment because it's simply not worth the potential backlash and not worth going to small claims court over it. They just choose to not work with the client again.
Business Development Specialist, Intelligent Telemarketing. Research and target new sectors and markets for clients
1moI personally would never name and shame. Take legal route. In over 20 years of business, only had to resort twice to sending a legal letter requesting payment. Debt paid within 24 hours. There was no dispute on quality of our service. One firm thought as we were small business, he could get away with not paying. The other was struggling financially.