Skill Development is Not Enough: The Urgent Need for Skill Implementation in Campuses
Skill development isn't just a buzzword—it's the defining factor of career success in today’s fast-evolving world. Universities and institutions proudly showcase their courses in coding, communication, and analytical thinking, yet a crucial gap remains. As an academic leader, I’ve seen firsthand that students often graduate with a wealth of theoretical knowledge but lack the ability to translate it into practical expertise. Learning a skill is just the beginning; the real game-changer is skill execution. The future of education must go beyond classrooms and labs, embedding hands-on experiences, industry-driven projects, and real-world problem-solving into the learning journey. It's time we shift the narrative from ‘acquiring skills’ to ‘applying skills’—because true development happens when students don’t just learn, but doThis article explores the gap between knowing and doing, why implementing skills trumps just developing them, the challenges in making that transition, and how campuses can integrate hands-on experiences. It also highlights success stories (like Super 60 and The Uniques Community) that prove the value of skill implementation, and offers strategies to embed these practices in academia. The message is clear: developing a skill isn’t enough; students must use that skill in real situations to truly succeed in their careers.
The Gap Between Theory and Practice in Education
Despite heavy investment in education and training, a worrying gap persists between theoretical skill acquisition and real-world application. Students excel in coursework and earn certificates in various skills, yet employers and the students themselves often find them underprepared for actual jobs. Research reveals a confidence and capability gap: Only about one-third of college students believe they will graduate with the skills and knowledge needed to be successful in the job market. In one survey, about 20% of recent graduates admitted their college education did not provide the skills necessary for their first job, and nearly half didn’t even apply to some entry-level positions because they felt unqualified. In short, many graduates leave campus uncertain how to use what they learned when real problems arise.
Employers echo these concerns. Industry leaders frequently bemoan the lack of practical skills among recent graduates, despite their academic credentials. There is often a pronounced disconnect between what is taught in a classroom and what a job actually requires on a day-to-day basis. A student might ace an exam on marketing theory, for example, but struggle to create and execute an actual marketing campaign for a client. This theory-practice divide results in a talent pool that is educated on paper yet slow to ramp up in the workplace. Employers must spend time (and money) training new hires in basic workplace skills that ideally should have been practiced during college. The consequence is frustrating for all stakeholders: students feel their expensive education isn’t paying off, and employers feel colleges are not producing “job-ready” graduates.
Bridging this gap requires acknowledging that knowing a concept is not the same as applying it. A coding bootcamp on campus might teach a language’s syntax, but building a real application under time and client constraints is a different ballgame. Similarly, a management course might cover leadership models without giving a student any experience in actually leading a team. The result is graduates who have theoretical knowledge but lack the confidence and experience to implement solutions in unstructured environments. This gap between theory and practice is one of the biggest challenges in higher education today, and it directly impacts student success and employability.
Why Skill Implementation Matters for Career Success
Focusing on skill implementation isn’t just an academic exercise – it has profound implications for a student’s long-term career success. Employers today aren’t merely looking for candidates who can recite facts or formulae; they seek problem solvers and self-starters who can hit the ground running. Real-world experience during college is often what differentiates a successful job candidate from the rest. In fact, a Strada-Gallup survey concluded that higher education’s promise of social mobility hinges on students graduating with purpose and the skills needed to land their first job. When students lack opportunities to apply skills, they also lack confidence – a critical trait for career growth. It’s telling that a majority of students in one study felt underprepared for the workforce, highlighting demand for new, work-relevant learning models to support the transition from education to employment.
Research consistently shows that hands-on experience gives graduates a career edge. Internship participation is a prime example. Students who take part in internships (especially quality, hands-on internships) tend to receive more job offers and command higher starting salaries than those who don’t. In one analysis, paid interns averaged far more job offers than students with no internship or only coursework on their résumé. The reason is simple: by applying skills in a work setting, these students demonstrated that they can convert classroom learning into tangible results. They have stories to tell in interviews about challenges faced and solved, teamwork navigated, and projects delivered. That kind of practical savvy is invaluable for long-term success – it not only helps in landing the first job but also in accelerating growth thereafter.
Beyond the first job, the ability to continually learn and implement new skills is what sustains a career in the modern economy. Technologies and methodologies evolve rapidly in most fields. An engineer or teacher who has practiced implementing new ideas is more adaptable over decades than one who only excelled in academic tests. Skill implementation builds adaptability. It ingrains a mindset of “learn, do, reflect, improve,” which remains with students for life. Studies on experiential learning back this up: learning through direct experience not only builds immediate competence but also teaches students how to learn from doing. In other words, students become better at picking up future skills, because they’re used to closing the loop from knowledge to action. This has long-term benefits – such graduates tend to navigate career challenges more effectively, often rising to leadership roles because they can translate ideas into results.
Finally, skill implementation experiences often cultivate soft skills like communication, teamwork, and problem-solving under pressure – traits strongly linked to career advancement. It’s one thing to learn theory about teamwork; it’s another to actually collaborate with diverse peers on a months-long project with real stakes. The latter builds interpersonal skills, empathy, and resilience. These qualities matter greatly for promotions, leadership roles, or entrepreneurial success years down the line. Research in education has noted that students apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios, making learning more meaningful and sticky when it’s tied to real experiences. Therefore, emphasizing skill implementation is not just about getting that first job – it’s about equipping students for a lifetime of learning and achievement.
From Learning to Execution: Challenges and Pitfalls
If implementing skills is so critical, why isn’t it happening in every course and program? The journey from learning to execution is fraught with challenges for both students and educators. Understanding these pitfalls is the first step to addressing them.
One major challenge is the academic culture and curriculum structure. Many institutions have rigid curricula focused on covering a breadth of theoretical content, leaving little room for practical application. Cramming syllabi with lectures often means time constraints for hands-on projects. Educators face pressure to “get through” textbook material to meet exam requirements, which can crowd out open-ended experiential activities. There may also be institutional inertia or resistance to change – schools have taught a certain way for decades, and shifting to a more application-oriented model can be daunting. Some faculty and administrators worry that focusing on practical work might dilute academic rigor or disrupt established routines and standardized testing outcomes. Changing minds and systems within academia can be slow, even when we know the benefits of experiential approaches.
Resources and logistics pose another significant hurdle. Experiential learning pedagogies tend to be expensive and time-consuming to implement. Running a lab or project-driven course might require special equipment, materials, or funding for field trips and industry visits. Not all institutions have the budget for cutting-edge labs or partnerships with companies to facilitate internships or projects. Additionally, arranging real-world projects involves coordination and sometimes risk – projects can fail, or not every student team will deliver a neat outcome, which is uncomfortable for institutions used to tidy grading systems. Educators also need training and support to manage these kinds of learning experiences. Not every professor has industry experience or knows how to supervise a project where outcomes are unpredictable. This skills gap among instructors can make them hesitant to try something beyond the traditional lecture. In essence, implementing skill-based learning often requires more effort and creativity from teachers, and without support or incentives, many stick to conventional methods.
Students, too, face challenges in the leap to execution. After years of schooling that rewarded memorization and formulaic problem-solving, some students struggle when confronted with open-ended, real-world tasks. It’s psychologically safer to follow instructions for a grade than to take initiative on an ambiguous project and risk failure. The lack of prior exposure makes students fear that they might “do it wrong” when there isn’t a single correct answer. Furthermore, not all students have equal access to implementation opportunities – those who are less confident or come from less privileged backgrounds might self-select out of optional internships or projects, further widening skill gaps. Without guidance, a student might not know how to begin applying their knowledge outside structured assignments.
Another pitfall is assessment. Traditional education evaluates students with tests and quizzes, which are straightforward to grade. But how do you grade a collaborative project or a community initiative? Institutions often struggle to measure the learning from skill implementation activities. This can make such activities seem “extra” rather than integral to the course. However, innovative assessment methods (like portfolios of work, project demonstrations, and reflective essays) can capture these outcomes, and some educators are adopting them. The challenge is ensuring these methods are accepted as valid and fair. Until educators and accreditors fully embrace new assessment models, there’s a tendency to sideline practical work in favor of what’s easy to mark with a percentage.
In summary, moving from learning to execution involves overcoming cultural resistance, resource limitations, student anxiety, and evaluation issues. These challenges are real – but they are not insurmountable. With recognition of the value of skill implementation, many institutions and teachers are finding creative ways to navigate these obstacles. The next sections will explore how experiential learning, mentorship, and project opportunities can be woven into academia, and how some pioneering programs have done it successfully.
Experiential Learning: Bridging the Classroom and the Real World
One of the most powerful ways to promote skill implementation is through experiential learning – the philosophy of “learning by doing.” Instead of passively absorbing information, students engage in direct experiences like projects, internships, labs, or simulations and then reflect on them. This approach bridges classroom theory and real-world practice in a tangible way. Studies have long shown that experiential learning is crucial for career readiness, because it builds industry-relevant skills and a deeper understanding of how theoretical concepts play out in real scenarios. As education theorist David Kolb outlined, knowledge is continuously recycled and solidified through a cycle of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. In simpler terms: when students try something, think about how it went, relate it to what they know, and then attempt improvements, learning truly sticks.
Real-world relevance is a key benefit of this approach. Through internships, co-op programs, service-learning, or project-based courses, students get to apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations, making their learning far more meaningful. For example, an engineering student who interns on a construction site suddenly sees how the formulas from class determine whether a design is safe – and what happens when unexpected variables (like soil conditions or material delays) come into play. This context cements understanding in a way no textbook problem can. Likewise, a business student working on a community consulting project learns not just the marketing strategies from lectures, but also how to deal with a real client’s limited budget and shifting requirements. These experiences simulate what graduates will face in their careers, effectively reducing the learning curve when they transition into jobs.
Experiential learning also enhances critical thinking and problem-solving skills. When students are given a real problem – say, developing an app to solve a campus need or conducting a biological field study – there is rarely a single correct answer provided. They must experiment, troubleshoot, and often deal with failure or unexpected outcomes. This encourages creative thinking and resilience. Rather than being discouraged by a wrong answer on a test, students in a project learn to iterate: if one solution doesn’t work, they try another approach. Over time, they become more adept at tackling unfamiliar challenges, a skill that is invaluable in any career. In a traditional class, problems are often neatly scoped; in an experiential setting, complexity is embraced, teaching students to break down big challenges into manageable parts and innovate solutions.
Another benefit is that students gain self-awareness and confidence from experiential learning. They can see their progress in a concrete way – for instance, by the end of a project or internship, they have a finished product or a set of outcomes they achieved. Reflecting on these experiences helps students identify their strengths and weaknesses. A student might discover that they excel in brainstorming ideas but need to work on time management, or that they enjoy field work more than lab work. Such insights are hard to come by through exams alone, yet are crucial for guiding one’s career path. This reflection also builds a narrative for students – they develop stories and examples they can share in job interviews or personal statements, demonstrating not just what they know, but what they can do with what they know.
Importantly, experiential learning doesn’t have to be an add-on or extracurricular; it can be integrated into the curriculum. Many institutions are adopting project-based learning in coursework, requiring students to complete a practical project as part of their grade. Others have capstone projects for seniors that synthesize everything they’ve learned into a real-world application. Even in the humanities, experiential elements like research projects, archival work, or community engagements can turn knowledge into action. The key is to provide structured opportunities where students must use their skills in unscripted situations. When done right, the academic content and experiential components feed each other: theory guides practice, and practice enriches understanding of theory. This synergy produces graduates who are not only knowledgeable but also capable – a true goal of education.
Mentorship: Guiding Students from Learning to Doing
While experience is a great teacher, mentorship acts as the coach on the sidelines – guiding, correcting, and encouraging students as they attempt to implement skills. Mentorship can take many forms in an educational setting: professors mentoring students on research or projects, industry professionals mentoring through campus-sponsored programs, or even peer mentorship where senior students guide juniors. The core idea is to have someone with experience provide feedback and support to the learner as they try to apply new skills. This dramatically accelerates learning and helps students overcome execution hurdles that they might not surmount alone.
A good mentor bridges the gap between theory and practice by offering real-world perspectives. For example, after a student learns a programming language, a mentor from the tech industry might help them understand how to structure a real software project, manage version control, or collaborate using agile methods – insights that textbooks may not emphasize. Mentors can also share their own failures and successes, providing a narrative roadmap that students can learn from. Research across disciplines finds that mentoring is associated with a wide range of favourable outcomes for students, including improved motivation and better career opportunities. In essence, mentors help students translate classroom learning into professional competence, and often into career connections.
From the student’s point of view, mentorship builds confidence and accountability. Knowing that an experienced person is there to guide them gives students the courage to take on ambitious projects or unfamiliar tasks. Mentors often push mentees out of their comfort zones – for instance, encouraging a student who is unsure about their leadership skills to take the lead in a team project, with the mentor advising in the background. This gentle push, combined with the safety net of advice, helps students actually practice skills like leadership, communication, or technical execution that they might shy away from on their own. Moreover, regular check-ins with a mentor create a sense of accountability; students are more likely to follow through on implementing a skill if they know someone will ask about their progress. It turns abstract goals (like “learn data analysis”) into concrete actions (“analyze this dataset and we’ll review your findings next week”).
Mentorship also plays a crucial role in helping students navigate the transition to the professional world. Mentors often help mentees understand what is expected in a professional setting: how to communicate in meetings, how to manage time and projects, and how to deal with real-world constraints like deadlines or client feedback. These insights are part of skill implementation too – it’s not just can you code, but can you deliver a coding project under real conditions. For instance, a design student might have great artistic skills (developed in class) but may not know how to handle a client’s critique; a mentor in a design firm could coach them on incorporating feedback and meeting client needs. Such nuances can be learned the hard way through trial and error, but mentorship smooths the learning curve.
On the educator side, establishing mentorship programs on campus can enhance the overall learning ecosystem. Faculty who mentor students on projects often find it rewarding and see better outcomes in student performance. Alumni or industry professionals who engage as mentors create a bridge between the institution and the industry, often opening doors for internships and placements for the students they mentor. Some campuses formalize this through incubator programs, accelerator labs, or “industry mentor” schemes for final-year projects. The results are mutually beneficial: students get to implement skills with expert guidance, and mentors often report that mentees bring fresh perspectives and enthusiasm into their work as well. It creates a cycle of learning and professional growth, reinforcing that learning doesn’t stop at graduation – and in fact, showing students the value of seeking mentors throughout their careers.
Real-World Projects and Industry Exposure: Learning by Solving Real Problems
There’s no substitute for real-world projects when it comes to testing and honing a student’s skills. Solving real problems – whether through industry collaboration, competitions, community service, or entrepreneurship – forces students to adapt their knowledge to unstructured situations, much like they will have to in their jobs. Campuses that facilitate student engagement with real-world projects often see a dramatic difference in outcomes. Students move from being passive learners to active problem solvers, and they often create tangible portfolio pieces that boost their employability.
One effective model is incorporating industry-sponsored projects into the curriculum. For example, an engineering department might partner with a local company to have students design a prototype for a real engineering challenge, or a business school might have students work on a consulting project for a small business or NGO. These projects require students to apply classroom concepts to meet a client’s objectives under real constraints. They learn to gather requirements, deal with resource limitations, and adjust when things don’t go as planned. Crucially, they also learn professional behaviors – communicating with stakeholders, writing reports, and presenting results. Employers greatly value this experience; as one employer survey indicated, the vast majority of companies want graduates who can solve real problems and contribute immediately. When a student can discuss a project they worked on for an actual client (rather than just theoretical class assignments), it signals that they have implementation skills, not just book smarts.
Hackathons, competitions, and incubator programs are another avenue for real-world skill application. In hackathons or case competitions, students are thrown into an intense problem-solving scenario, often competing to provide the best solution to a challenge within a short time. These events mimic high-pressure project environments and encourage interdisciplinary teamwork. A computer science student might pair up with a design student and a business student to develop a prototype and pitch it – an experience that teaches them more about collaboration and real-world constraints (like time management and scope trade-offs) than a semester of lectures could. Many students say they learn more in a 24-hour hackathon about effective coding practices or product design than in weeks of routine coursework, simply because they had to apply themselves under real conditions.
Industry exposure is equally important. This could be through internships (as discussed earlier), site visits, job shadowing, or inviting industry professionals to campus to lead real-project workshops. When students visit workplaces or interact with professionals, they pick up on the unwritten skills needed in the workplace: professional etiquette, networking, and the context behind their technical work. Something as simple as a field visit can enlighten a student on how their textbook learning fits into the bigger picture of an industry. For instance, pharmacy students might study drug formulation in class, but a visit to a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility can show them the entire chain of research, development, production, and quality control – making their knowledge far more holistic. These insights clarify why they learn certain theories at all, increasing their motivation and ability to apply those theories correctly.
Finally, entrepreneurial and community projects on campus allow students to implement skills while creating real impact. Starting a small venture, developing an app for campus use, or volunteering technical skills for a social cause are all projects that count as real-world experience. Universities that support student entrepreneurship (through innovation labs or startup competitions) essentially provide a sandbox for skill implementation. Students not only apply what they know; they also learn to deal with failure, pivot ideas, and persist – essential real-world lessons. Similarly, working on community service projects (like designing a clean water system for a village as a service-learning project) exposes students to constraints and stakeholders they wouldn’t encounter in a classroom. In all these cases, the act of doing something real transforms a student’s capabilities. They stop asking “Will this be on the test?” and start asking “How can I make this work in reality?” – a sure sign that skill development has evolved into skill implementation.
Successful Models of Skill Implementation on Campus
Real-world skill application isn’t just a theory – some educational programs and student communities have made it a reality. Let’s look at two case studies of successful models that prioritize skill implementation: Super 60 and The Uniques Community. These examples show that with the right structure and mindset, campuses can produce graduates who are adept at translating knowledge into action.
Super 60: Beyond the Classroom – A Legacy of Transformation
As the co-founder of the Super 60 Initiative, I always feel a deep sense of pride in witnessing the transformative impact this program has had on students since its inception in 2017. What began as a focused effort to bridge the gap between academia and industry for engineering students has now evolved into a multi-disciplinary success story, expanding into Pharma Super 60 and BCA Super 60, catering to a broader spectrum of students who aspire to be industry-ready from day one.
Super 60 is more than just a specialized academic program—it is a movement dedicated to real-world skill application, hands-on learning, and leadership development. Instead of focusing solely on grades and theoretical knowledge, Super 60 emphasizes practical exposure, industry-driven projects, and personal development.
For instance, in Pharma Super 60, students are given first-hand industry exposure through company visits, live case studies, and interactive workshops. In one such case, a group of Pharma Super 60 students had the opportunity to visit a pharmaceutical company, where they gained hands-on experience in industrial processes and workflow. This practical learning environment enabled them to bridge the gap between textbook knowledge and large-scale pharmaceutical production, an experience far more enriching than traditional classroom lectures. Similarly, the BCA Super 60 cohort is actively engaged in software development projects, hackathons, and collaborations with tech industry leaders, ensuring they are equipped with the technical expertise and problem-solving mindset needed for modern IT careers.
A core element of Super 60 is mentorship and soft skill development. Students don’t just work on projects; they tackle real-world challenges with guidance from faculty mentors and industry experts. Whether it’s designing a solar-powered device for rural communities or developing an AI-driven software application, students apply technical skills while mastering project management, teamwork, and leadership. The cohort model creates a micro-community of high-achieving students who push each other forward, with senior participants mentoring new batches, fostering a culture of peer-to-peer learning.
Another defining feature of Super 60 is its focus on leadership and initiative. We encourage students to step beyond their comfort zones, take ownership of projects, and drive innovation. Many Super 60 students have gone on to organize major events, lead research projects, and establish industry collaborations. In one remarkable instance, a Super 60 batch introduced a technology community chapter on campus, serving as the link between students and a global tech platform—an initiative that continues to benefit aspiring tech professionals on campus.
By the time Super 60 students graduate, they don’t just hold a degree—they carry a portfolio of tangible experiences. From leading hackathon teams to presenting projects at national conventions, their journey within the Super 60 framework ensures they are job-ready, confident, and industry-relevant. The overwhelming success of this model is reflected in higher placement rates, stronger industry connections, and the unwavering confidence of our graduates.
The impact of Super 60 has inspired other institutions to adopt similar models—proof that skill implementation is the key to empowering students beyond the classroom. As we continue to expand this initiative, the vision remains the same: to nurture a generation of professionals who are not just learners, but doers, innovators, and leaders.
The Uniques Community: Turning Students into Startup Leaders and Entrepreneurs
The Uniques Community is the community of my dreams—one that started from a small office space with just 14 students and has now expanded into a 20,000+ square-foot corporate-style infrastructure. This initiative was born out of a simple yet powerful vision: to create a space where students don’t just learn but apply, innovate, and build their own futures.
From the beginning, the goal was clear—to bridge the gap between education and industry, between learning and implementation, and between being job seekers and becoming job creators. Today, The Uniques Community is not just a student-led initiative—it’s a movement that nurtures entrepreneurial thinking, real-world skill application, and business leadership.
A Student-Led Initiative to Build Innovators, Not Just Employees
The Uniques Community is a 100% student-driven initiative designed to empower students with hands-on industry exposure, real-world projects, and leadership opportunities. Unlike conventional education models where students wait until their final year for internships or capstone projects, members of The Uniques start implementing their skills from day one.
This initiative was founded to create an ecosystem where students not only learn technical skills but also gain business acumen, develop leadership abilities, and work on real industry challenges. The mission statement of the community reflects its core philosophy:
“We help students bridge the gap between theory and practice and grow their knowledge by providing a peer-to-peer learning environment, by conducting workshops, study jams, and real-world projects.”
What sets The Uniques Community apart is its focus on entrepreneurial thinking. Members are encouraged not just to work on projects but to understand business models, market needs, and innovation strategies. The goal is simple—to turn job seekers into job creators.
A Corporate-Like Startup Ecosystem on Campus
The process of skill implementation and entrepreneurship development in The Uniques Community follows a structured model that mirrors real-world startup incubation:
By the time students graduate, they don’t just have a degree—they have industry experience, real-world projects, and a portfolio that showcases their entrepreneurial capabilities.
More Than Just Coders—Creating Business Leaders
Unlike traditional education, which often focuses solely on technical skills, The Uniques Community ensures a holistic learning experience. This means that students don’t just become great coders or engineers—they develop the mindset and skills needed to launch and scale startups.
This ecosystem fosters:
National-Level Success Stories: Hackathons, Startups, and Industry Placements
The Uniques Community has consistently produced extraordinary success stories, proving that hands-on skill implementation is the best form of education:
The Mentor-Mentee Model: Preparing the Next Generation of Entrepreneurs
A key component of The Uniques Community is its Mentor-Mentee Program, which ensures continuous guidance and learning.
This mentorship culture ensures that every student receives the right support at every stage of their growth—from acquiring skills to implementing them in real-world scenarios.
From 14 Students in a Small Room to a Thriving Startup Hub
When The Uniques Community started, it was just 14 students working from a small office space, driven by the idea of creating a learning ecosystem beyond traditional education.
Today, it has evolved into a full-scale corporate learning and startup incubation hub, spanning 20,000+ square feet, providing students with real-world projects, client interactions, startup opportunities, and a direct path into the entrepreneurial ecosystem.
The Uniques Community is not just another student club—it’s a revolution in education. It has proven that when students are given the right environment, real-world exposure, and entrepreneurial freedom, they don’t just become employees—they become business leaders, innovators, and startup founders.
Education Must Prepare Students for Startups, Not Just Jobs
In today’s world, entrepreneurship and innovation are driving economic growth. Universities must go beyond traditional teaching methods and start providing real-world startup experiences on campus. The Uniques Community is a testament to what is possible when students are given the right opportunities—they build, innovate, and lead.
Education must move beyond job preparation and into startup incubation. The future belongs to those who don’t just learn, but implement, innovate, and create. The Uniques Community is proving that the next generation of entrepreneurs and startup founders are already here.
Strategies to Integrate Skill Implementation into Academics
The benefits of skill implementation are clear, but how can educational institutions systematically incorporate these practices? Based on research and the experiences of programs like the ones above, here are several actionable strategies for campuses to bridge the gap between skill development and implementation:
By adopting these strategies, educational institutions can transform themselves from primarily knowledge-delivery systems into launch pads for real-world readiness. It’s about embedding the philosophy that doing is as important as knowing at every level of the academic experience.
Conclusion:
In today’s fast-changing world, simply developing skills in theory is not enough. Students must have the chance to practice, fail, learn, and succeed at using those skills in authentic situations. The gap between campus and career can be effectively closed when colleges make skill implementation a core part of education. This shift produces graduates who are confident and capable from day one – the kind of graduates who not only survive but thrive in their careers. In my own experience, the most successful and employable students were those who had sought out experiences beyond the classroom – the ones who built things, led teams, interned, and solved real problems during their studies. As educators and academic leaders, it’s our responsibility to make such experiences mainstream, not the exception. Skill development will always be fundamental, but it is through skill implementation that education truly fulfills its promise. By championing experiential learning, mentorship, and real-world projects, campuses can ensure that students don’t just earn degrees – they graduate with the ability to make things happen. The future demands doers, and it’s time our educational institutions wholeheartedly embrace that reality.
Insightful Business Engagements Capacity Building
6moMr. Gill. Yes, it’s not Development, should be Skill Implementation at every level Of Engineering and Technological Pursuance. Agree with you. As I continue to campaign for creation of Centres Of Excellence in Engineering and Technology based institutions, it’s important to implement these skills in Production and Automation and Gamification driven environments at SVIET. I certainly have an implementable idea 👍
ITIL, Google Cybersecurity, MSc, EPBM - IIM-C
6moVery well thought and explained
Full Stack Developer @Network Kings | DSA with Javascript | C++ & C Programmer | Graphic Designer | Social Media Manager | Software Engineering Student at SVIET | Super 60 Batch Member
7moYour efforts and trust are so precious for us sir