There is something rotten in the US Healthcare system
Healthcare is an asset NOT an expense
The republicans had eight years to come up with something better than the Affordable Care Act (ACA). None of the AHCA proposals honor the commitment that Donald Trump made during his election. Instead, the proposals includes 1) defunding of preventive care, which will drive up costs, 2) repeal of important provisions that ensure that people with pre-existing conditions can afford a plan 3) Redefinitions of what healthcare is to a point where important care no longer is included driving up out of pocket cost 4) Increase of cost for the elderly who needs healthcare the most.
I am in support of more effective healthcare; however, the inconvenient truth is that the U.S. healthcare system is three times (3X) as expensive per capita compared to the single payer healthcare systems in Europe, which cover EVERYBODY, with better average outcomes.
Furthermore, providing healthcare enables patients to be active, hold jobs, and pay taxes.
I am always surprised to hear healthcare being a cost. It’s an asset that enables patients to survive, to continue contributing to society, and thereby pay taxes.
In other words, the United States could provide healthcare for ALL with the existing budget by making structural changes.
Here are a couple urgent changes which could provide a more cost-effective healthcare system in the United States:
- Remove any economic incentives for doctors for writing drug prescriptions and create economic incentives for outcome = health
- Enable Medicare to negotiate with drug providers to lower drug prices (drugs are three times (3X) more expensive in the United States compared to single payer systems which negotiate those prices).
- Accelerate PEMA regulation which changes the payer codes for diagnostics from a cost-based system to a value-based system. Diagnostics are not attractive investments because they don't get reimbursed the same way as drugs!
- Change the patents laws so companies can invest in diagnostics. Right now, we can't get patents issued on our innovations.
- Support streamlining of the FDA approval process of new treatments based on real-life data rather than structural clinical trials. Clinical trails do not reflect how the drug will work in a real-life situation.
- Improve access to experimental drugs and drugs approved in other indications when existing standard of care don't work. Next generation diagnostics can assist in determining much for efficient treatments; however once that data exists, hurdles still remain for getting access to those drugs either from a regulatory or a payer perspective.
Medicare pays the doctor six percent (6%) of the cost of the drug and they is a perverse incentive that makes doctors get paid for writing drug prescriptions - and choose more expensive drugs. This is in steep contrast to the Stalk laws which makes it illegal for diagnostic companies to provide economic incentives to doctors to use diagnostics. Next generation diagnostics can predict responses to drugs, and the other truth is that only one out of four cancer drugs prolong life! We are wasting $75 billion out of the $100 billion we spend on cancer drugs every year globally.
I do believe that a commercial system can work in the United States; however, the current system is not outcome/value based, and that needs to change.
Being Danish I am intimately aware of the benefits as well as downside of a single payer system which does not implement novel technology with the same enthusiasm as the US healthcare system.
Obamacare (ACA) was a plaster on a problem that needs a root canal, however I am confident that it can be improved and surpass any single payer system granted that the right changes are made. The current proposals does not do that.
The Trump Healthcare (AHCA) proposals reduces cost by reduce care and limit access for some of the Americans that need it most.
I urge Republicans as well as Democrats to come together to improve healthcare for all Americans.
Gitte Pedersen
CEO and co-founder
Genomic Expression
You can read more here Healthcare for us collection of articles
LSU Health Foundation BOD (Chair 2003-06); Healthcare innovations
8yGitte, many good points. However not sure what the 6% "kickback" is that you referred to? Could you explain?
Strategic Adviser; Envoy; Speaker; Mediator; Former Navy JAG “America’s Flagship” (CV64) & Trial Attorney US Department of Justice; Delaware Trial, Business and Corporate Restructuring Attorney
8yNicely done Gitta- yours is at least a balanced analysis and we do need a bipartisan effort going forward. Let's see what comes out of the Senate. Wonderful people the Danes but Denmark has a population of 6,000,000 (maybe less) and not a terribly diverse citizenry. So whatever they do with their progressive and enlightened social welfare programs is not terribly instructive for the complexities of politics, the market place and healthcare needs/expectations in the US. We probably have more MRI machines in Philadelphia then all of Denmark. But great effort- we need more dialogue and friendly public debate especially in Congress. Keep the thoughtful posts coming. Cheers
Scientist, CEO, company builder, and investor with a mission to improve health and sustainability. RNA enthusiast. Focused on helping cancer patients survive through better diagnostics and treatment navigation tools
8yPeter Cranstone you are absolutely right - worth case scenario people will die from lack of care. I would like to see that calculation, how many of the 24 million will not survive the Trump presidency! The notion that it is no longer mandated to have insurance will further increase cost. It's time to think outside the box.
Fullsky Partners | STANDUP2CANCER / CancerCommons/Venture Philanthropy..mission capital via program related investments and DAFs
8yThank you...interesting and ironic that same Congressmen (women) who are demanding fiscal responsibility aren't interested in the cost of denying basic and preventive insurance/healthcare to large percent of population..and when that number ( in the trillions) is determined, it will receive the same ' fake news' characterization as climate change..
CEO@3PMobile l Reimagining Digital Engagement l Low-cost Growth Engine for Web-based Businesses l Harnessing the Power of Digital Ecosystems through Consumer Choice.
8yGitte - not to pile on 😊 check out this latest headline: Think tank on GOP health bill: Coverage to plummet, cancer treatment costs to skyrocket http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/04/politics/cap-upton-amendment-health-care/index.html If coverage plummets then all that's left is sick people as the healthy simply stop paying. With no cap on premiums we now face skyrocketing costs simply to live. Somehow that is just deeply offensive when you have to chose between life and death.