Is there still a role for "disciplines"​ in a post AI school environment
Ms Brainmocker 1963 – The Jetsons

Is there still a role for "disciplines" in a post AI school environment

Disciplines, or specialist ways of seeing and understanding the world, typically only become effective at the post-secondary level, unless the young person has had the rare opportunity to spend 10,000 hours specializing in a particular area, such as we see in music, robotics, or sports. Research shows that whilst discipline specialists possess specific knowledge and skills that make them experts in one area, this expertise does not translate to other unrelated fields to any appreciable degree. Therefore, attempting to achieve a level of expertise in EIGHT different disciplines within a primary or secondary school context, given only 13,000 hours of classroom instruction in thirteen years of school, typically results in a superficial understanding or a mere taste of what the discipline entails. When the teacher is not a specialist or when it is not their passion, this can lead to premature closure of a possible pathway.

Distinct disciplines were a logical construction in a pre-AI world where one person had to hold the entirety of that knowledge and its related processes. However, now that we can use machines to assist in holding and retrieving that knowledge and removing some of the burden of calculations, it is now possible to hold multiple areas of speciality. An AI world accelerates this process even further, allowing for the drawing of specialist-level links at the highest level between previously unrelated areas, simply because we could not see the links at the specialist level. Only rare occasions involve a specialist in a discipline changing into a new field. These AI-powered, cross-disciplinary breakthroughs at the expert level that combine knowledge across all disciplines will be the genesis of a new renaissance.

I am not arguing that there is no core knowledge worth learning, but with the development of AI that can tailor the curriculum to the wants and needs of the individual learner, should we not transition the role of the teacher to that of facilitator/ guide? This year at Gisborne Montessori we moved to the term “Guides” for all adults who work with young people, be they teacher or support.

Discussion welcomed.

Paul O'Neill

Strategic Learning and Development Consultant

2y

Disciplines should become relics of the past. Like ‘ancient philosopher” past. Not to say they aren’t an interesting group of themes by which to curate our knowledge. And not to say that we throw the knowledge out - it’s that studying by subject orientation limits a learners capacity to understand the interconnectedness of everything. Disciplines or subject areas in schools joust and jockey to emphasize their individual importance. Schools sometimes label themselves based on disciplines. A science focus school for example. And so if education was just about knowledge consumption then maybe disciplines are ok. Where disciplines fail is when you attempt to question big topics or engage an inquiry based method. It’s not possible to interrogate information and form an adequate response when you look at a problem through a single discipline lens. For example you cannot form a complete understanding of climate change when you look at it through purely a biology lens.

I believe it is about starting with thinking about what we believe we achieve in classrooms and measuring this against what the true outcomes of our efforts are; the things our students take away from our interactions with them and vice versa. Good teachers, effective teachers give students the experience of rewarding and balanced human relationships and mentoring. They engender team work, self care and inclusion. In terms of content and subject matter, this may be our focus but the lessons are about the quality and meaning of interactions.

Like
Reply
Tina Broughton

Learning Program Developer | Solutions Engineer

2y

Honestly don’t even think it’s about post-AI education - this has been a need for a very long time. It’s heartening to see educators striving for this more and more. Just hope the administrators and decision makers catch on soon.

Like
Reply
Miriam Scott

Educator focused on integrating technology into the mainstream learning experience. Tiny fish in this expanding pond....gulp! Education | AI | Change Management | Business

2y

Interesting question. The introduction to connectivity in the classrooms (with devices & web) transitioned the teacher from being The fount of all knowledge to the facilitator who connected students with the information they needed. This disruptive tech will have a similar impact. However, the teacher will become the guide who teaches the critical thinking skills at the forefront to then link to the information. Our learners will still need to be discerning users of data and the teachers who adapt will be the ones who will help our students navigate🫶

Like
Reply
Kim Flintoff

Provocateur, professional leader, education futurist, researcher, educator, catalyst, edupreneur, sustainability advocate, co-founder STEM4Innovation

2y

Many of us eschew the cultural baggage that comes with the label "teacher" - I like Erica McWilliam 's invocation of Meddler in the Middle.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44028783_Teaching_for_creativity_From_sage_to_guide_to_meddler

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore content categories