Stress: The Missing Link in Housing Policy for Older People
Housing policy often frames later life moves around push and pull.
Push factors: homes that are too big, unsafe, or costly to manage.
Pull factors: the attractions of retirement housing, new communities, or releasing equity.
Policy then responds with more supply, better marketing, or financial incentives.
But new research shows this misses the real issue.
The hidden barrier: stress
Churchill Insurance reports that 40% of people say the sheer stress of moving is the biggest deterrent. Not money. Not location. Not a lack of alternatives. Stress.
What does that look like in practice?
Packing up a lifetime of possessions.
Juggling solicitors, chains, and delays.
Leaving neighbours and communities built up over decades.
The emotional weight of leaving a family home.
For many, it feels overwhelming — so they stay put, even when the house no longer fits their needs.
Why stress matters for policy
If government wants to:
Free up family homes for younger households,
Reduce health and care costs by getting people into safer housing,
Fill retirement housing schemes that remain under-occupied,
then stress must be part of the policy conversation.
Without tackling it, every measure to “unlock housing wealth,” “rightsize,” or “support ageing in place” will be horribly compromised.
Behavioural reality, not policy theory
We can’t treat this as a rational choice problem. Behavioural research shows people put far more weight on short-term pain (the upheaval of moving) than on long-term gain (a better, safer home).
That explains why well-intentioned campaigns, incentives, and even urgent health needs often fail to shift behaviour. Policy that ignores the psychology of moving risks throwing money at a problem without changing outcomes.
What works in practice
The good news: stress is not insurmountable. The right kind of support can make moving feel possible.
Home Improvement Agencies already provide that bridge:
Helping with paperwork, benefits checks, and forms.
Finding and managing trusted contractors for small works to help a sale.
Preparing the new home with adaptations before someone moves in.
Giving families reassurance and keeping the process on track.
This hands-on support addresses stress directly. It turns the theory of “downsizing” into a choice people can actually act on.
The policy risk of doing nothing
Ignore stress and the costs ripple out:
Downsizing strategies underdeliver.
Retirement housing sits empty.
NHS and social care costs climb as people stay in unsuitable homes.
Recognise and resource stress support, and we unlock housing choices for older people — and make national policy actually deliver.
Time to close the gap
Policy makers have spent years focusing on push and pull. It’s time to acknowledge the third factor: stress.
Because until we do, housing policy for older people will remain stuck on paper, while the people it’s designed for remain stuck in homes they can’t leave.
👉 Full research here: Fear of stress is deterring potential home-movers – research
What an excellent article & insight. Well done 👏
Advanced Practitioner and Independent Occupational Therapist, Associate Lecturer, Clinical Supervisor and Post Gaduate Researcher
4dIt's one of life's most stressful times, elderly or not. But add reduced mobility, chronic conditions, pain etc into the mix and its no surprise that moving is far from and exciting prospect. More support is needed, from sorting and packing, to sourcing a property and the endless paperwork and delays with legals, to moving day and unpacking... in fact can wre have that across the board please - legals are dreadfully slow in my experience - unless chased daily
Principal at Jon Watson Consulting
1wInteresting posts. We went through the downsize process 6 years ago (then aged 70), from a 5 bedroom home (200 m2) in which we had brought up our two daughters, to 2 bedroom apartment (100m2). We didn't release capital and actually increased outgoings with the ground rent and service charge, but it was what we wanted. The downsizing and clearing out the loft and garage was actually quite cathartic! The two pull factors for us were "lock up and leave" (to our second home and to visit our daughter in Australia) and location (from edge of town, top of a steep hill to short walk to shops and metro station). BUT we weren't interested in a retirement community. We're in a mixed community (age and tenure), but with an apartment that is wheelchair accessible, with a lift from the basement garage. Interestingly, quite a few of our neighbours have moved here for the same reasons - phrases such as lock up & leave, accessibility, security, no gardening, mix of neighbours all crop up regularly when we talk to our neighbours. Sadly, our old next door neighbours, who were 10+ years older than us, realised they had left it too late to move, and were definitely in the "stressed" category - they're actually trapped.
CONNECTING THE DOTS AND MUCH MORE - Disability Advocate with Lived Experience National Diversity Awards nominee 2024 All4inclusion nominee award 2024 for positive role model with a disability
1wApart from stress for me it’s having a garden and of course a wheelchair adapted property. I want to be able to have my daughter stay and others but other offered a 1 bed flat - no outdoor space just a box !! We need to get some bungalows or smaller housers 2 bed but of a garden but most importantly able to be future proofed for those with mobility needs !
Associate Consultant at IMOGEN BLOOD & ASSOCIATES LTD
1wSo totally true