The Synergistic Evolution: Generative AI, TRIZ, and the Future of Problem Solving
Part 1: Generative AI: Development Through the Lens of TRIZ Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE)
The rapid ascent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) marks a transformative era in technology, captivating imaginations and reshaping industries. To truly grasp the trajectory of this evolution and anticipate its future, we can employ the insightful framework of TRIZ (the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), specifically its Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE). TESE offers a powerful lens through which to analyze the predictable patterns of development that engineering systems, including complex AI models, tend to follow over time. By examining the development of leading Generative AI models like Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT through these trends, we can gain a deeper understanding of their past, present, and potential future, fostering inspiration for the innovations yet to come.
1. Increasing Ideality: This trend posits that systems evolve to deliver more useful functions with less cost, energy, or harm. In the realm of Generative AI, we see this manifested in several ways. Newer models like Gemini 2.5 Pro and OpenAI's O-series are engineered for enhanced reasoning and "thinking" capabilities, aiming to solve increasingly complex problems with greater accuracy. Simultaneously, the development of more efficient models such as Gemini 2.0 Flash and GPT-4o prioritizes faster processing and lower computational costs, making these powerful technologies more accessible. Furthermore, the continuous efforts to reduce hallucination rates, as evidenced by the improvements in GPT-4.5, directly address the "harm" aspect by minimizing the generation of inaccurate or misleading information. This pursuit of ideality drives the relentless innovation in Generative AI, pushing towards models that are not only more capable but also more practical and reliable.
2. Uneven Development of Subsystems: This trend highlights that different parts of a system evolve at different speeds, often creating contradictions that spur further innovation. In Generative AI, we observe this in the varying rates of progress across different capabilities. For instance, while context window sizes have expanded dramatically (e.g., Gemini's 1 million tokens), the ability to fully leverage and coherently process such vast amounts of information for complex reasoning and creative tasks is still catching up. This disparity creates a "contradiction" that will likely drive innovation in memory management, attention mechanisms, and long-range dependency modeling. Similarly, while reasoning and problem-solving abilities are advancing rapidly, the knowledge cut-off dates for some models remain a limitation, indicating an unevenness in maintaining up-to-date knowledge bases. This lag will likely fuel the development of techniques for real-time knowledge integration and retrieval.
3. Transition to the Super-system: This trend suggests that systems eventually become integrated into larger, more complex systems or environments. Generative AI is already deeply embedded in various super-systems. Google integrates Gemini across its vast ecosystem, including Search, Workspace, and Android, making AI a pervasive feature within familiar tools. OpenAI, with its ChatGPT platform and API, encourages the development of a broad ecosystem of third-party applications and custom GPTs, extending the reach and functionality of its core models. This integration into larger systems amplifies the problem-solving and invention potential of Generative AI, allowing it to contribute to a wider range of tasks and workflows. The development of features like "Deep Research" in both Gemini and ChatGPT, which autonomously conduct web research and synthesize findings, exemplifies this transition to a super-system capable of interacting with and leveraging the vast resources of the internet.
4. Transition from Macro to Micro level: This trend describes the evolution from large, mechanical systems to smaller, more precise systems, eventually reaching nano-levels. In the context of Generative AI, this transition is metaphorical, representing a shift towards more specialized, efficient, and granular models and functionalities. The development of smaller, more focused models like GPT-4o Mini and the various experimental "Thinking" models within the Gemini family illustrates this trend towards tailored solutions for specific problem domains. Furthermore, the ability to create custom GPTs in the GPT Store allows users to develop highly specialized AI agents for niche applications, representing a "segmentation" towards more granular and user-defined inventive tools. This move towards "micro" level AI signifies a focus on efficiency, customization, and addressing specific user needs with greater precision.
5. Increasing Dynamism and Controllability: This trend indicates that systems become more flexible, adjustable, and controllable, able to adapt to different conditions. In Generative AI, we see this in the increasing number of parameters and configurations available to developers and users. Features like function calling, system instructions, and the ability to fine-tune models with custom data provide greater control over the behavior and output of these systems for specific tasks. Enhanced steerability in models like GPT-4.5 allows for more nuanced control over the creative output. The development of adjustable reasoning effort levels in models like OpenAI's o3-mini further exemplifies this trend towards increasing dynamism and the ability to tailor AI behavior to specific requirements. This increased controllability empowers users to direct the problem-solving and invention processes more effectively.
6. Introduction of Fields (Field Evolution): This trend describes the evolution of systems from relying on mechanical means to electromagnetic, optical, or other energy fields. In Generative AI, this can be interpreted as the shift towards models that can process and generate information across multiple modalities beyond just text. The increasing native multimodality of models like Gemini, which handles text, image, audio, video, and code, and GPT-4o, which processes text, image, and audio, demonstrates this evolution. This ability to operate across different "fields" of data expands the problem-solving and invention potential of Generative AI, allowing it to understand and create in richer and more diverse ways.
7. Segmentation → Multiplication → Integration: This trend describes a pattern where a system is initially segmented into parts, then those parts are duplicated or varied (multiplication), and finally integrated into a new, more complex whole. We see this pattern in the development of Generative AI ecosystems. Both Google and OpenAI offer a range of models with varying capabilities and price points (segmentation and multiplication). These models are then integrated into comprehensive platforms like Vertex AI and the ChatGPT platform, offering a suite of tools and functionalities within a unified environment. The GPT Store, with its vast array of custom GPTs developed by the community, further exemplifies this trend, where individual AI agents (segmented and multiplied based on specific tasks) are integrated into the ChatGPT ecosystem. This continuous cycle of segmentation, multiplication, and integration drives the increasing sophistication and versatility of Generative AI.
By analyzing the development of Generative AI through the lens of TRIZ's TESE, we gain a profound appreciation for the systematic and predictable nature of its evolution. These trends not only help us understand the remarkable progress achieved so far but also inspire us to envision the exciting possibilities that lie ahead. The journey of Generative AI is one of continuous refinement, integration, and expansion, promising to reshape the landscape of problem-solving and invention in ways we are only beginning to imagine.
Part 2: Impact of Future Generative AI on TRIZ Methodology
The emergence and continued evolution of sophisticated Generative AI models, as analyzed through the framework of TRIZ's Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE), will profoundly reshape the landscape of problem-solving and, consequently, the application of the TRIZ methodology itself. This second part delves into the anticipated impacts, exploring the potential for synergy, the questions it raises about the necessity of traditional TRIZ learning, and inspiring pathways for adapting to this transformative technological shift.
The Dawn of AI-Augmented TRIZ: The core strength of TRIZ lies in its systematic approach to innovation, derived from the study of countless successful inventions. Future Generative AI, with its unparalleled ability to process vast datasets and identify complex patterns, stands poised to become an invaluable partner in this endeavor. Imagine AI systems capable of autonomously navigating the TRIZ knowledge base, identifying relevant inventive principles and standard solutions based on a problem's specific contradictions. Such AI could drastically reduce the time and effort required for the initial stages of TRIZ analysis, allowing human experts to focus on the more nuanced and creative aspects of solution generation and refinement.
Automation and Acceleration: One of the most significant impacts will likely be the automation of several TRIZ tools. Contradiction analysis, a cornerstone of TRIZ, could be significantly enhanced by AI. By feeding AI detailed system parameters and desired outcomes, it could automatically identify potential technical and physical contradictions, even those that might not be immediately obvious to a human analyst. Furthermore, AI could accelerate the process of mapping these contradictions to the 40 inventive principles and the 76 standard solutions, potentially generating a wide array of relevant solution concepts in a fraction of the time it currently takes. This acceleration could democratize access to TRIZ, making its powerful tools available to a broader audience beyond dedicated experts.
Enhanced System Analysis and Prediction: The TESE framework itself could be significantly augmented by AI. As Generative AI models become more adept at understanding complex systems and their evolutionary trajectories, they could assist in predicting future development patterns with greater accuracy. By analyzing technological trends, patent data, and scientific literature, AI could identify emerging contradictions and potential evolutionary leaps, providing valuable insights for proactive innovation and strategic planning. This predictive capability, powered by AI's ability to process and synthesize massive amounts of information, could elevate the application of TESE from a primarily analytical tool to a powerful forecasting instrument.
The Question of Necessity: Will Learning TRIZ Still Matter? The advent of AI capable of performing many TRIZ functions naturally raises the question of whether individuals will still need to invest time and effort in learning the methodology. While AI will undoubtedly handle many of the procedural aspects, a fundamental understanding of TRIZ principles will likely remain crucial. Firstly, TRIZ provides a foundational "language" for innovation, enabling humans to effectively communicate with AI systems about problem structures and desired outcomes. Secondly, the ability to critically evaluate AI-generated solutions and understand the underlying inventive principles will be essential for ensuring the relevance and feasibility of these solutions. Human intuition, creativity, and domain-specific knowledge will still be required to refine and implement AI-suggested concepts. Finally, learning TRIZ cultivates a specific mindset focused on identifying and resolving contradictions, a skill that transcends the application of any particular tool, including AI. This inventive thinking mindset will remain invaluable in a world increasingly shaped by complex challenges.
Inspiring Pathways for AI Adoption and Adaptation: The future of TRIZ in the age of Generative AI is not one of replacement but rather of synergistic collaboration. Here are some inspiring pathways for adoption and adaptation:
In conclusion, the impact of future Generative AI on the TRIZ methodology is poised to be transformative. While AI will undoubtedly automate and accelerate many aspects of TRIZ, the fundamental principles and the inventive mindset it fosters will remain essential. The future lies in embracing AI as a powerful partner, integrating its capabilities into TRIZ education and application, and fostering a collaborative environment where human creativity and artificial intelligence work together to drive groundbreaking innovation and solve the complex problems of tomorrow. This synergy promises an inspiring future where the power of systematic invention is amplified by the intelligence of machines.
Part 3: Suggestions for AI Adoption in TRIZ - Inventive Problem Solving
The integration of Generative AI into the TRIZ methodology for inventive problem-solving offers a powerful synergy, capable of amplifying human ingenuity and accelerating the creation of innovative solutions. However, successful adoption requires a focused and deliberate strategy that recognizes the unique strengths of both AI and the TRIZ framework. This final part provides in-depth suggestions for individuals and organizations seeking to leverage the power of AI to revolutionize their TRIZ-based inventive problem-solving processes, fostering a culture of systematic innovation and inspiring a future where human and artificial intelligence collaborate to overcome even the most complex challenges.
1. Develop AI-Powered TRIZ Toolsets and Platforms: The most direct route to AI adoption in TRIZ involves the creation and utilization of specialized AI tools and platforms that directly support and enhance the application of TRIZ principles. This includes developing AI capable of:
Reasoning: AI excels at processing large amounts of data and identifying patterns, making it ideally suited for navigating the complex relationships within the TRIZ framework. Automating and augmenting these core TRIZ tools can significantly enhance efficiency and broaden the scope of potential solutions considered.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Inspiration: Imagine a future where AI acts as an intelligent TRIZ assistant, guiding users through the methodology, providing insightful suggestions, and unlocking a torrent of creative possibilities.
2. Integrate AI into TRIZ Education and Training: To ensure widespread and effective adoption, AI should be integrated into TRIZ education and training programs. This includes:
Reasoning: AI can personalize the learning experience, making TRIZ concepts more readily understandable and applicable. Virtual coaching can provide on-demand support, overcoming the limitations of traditional training methods. Simulations offer valuable hands-on practice without the risks associated with real-world experimentation.
Inspiration: Envision a future where AI democratizes access to TRIZ, empowering individuals from diverse backgrounds and disciplines to become skilled inventive problem solvers.
3. Foster Human-AI Collaboration in TRIZ Sessions: The most potent application of AI in TRIZ will likely involve seamless collaboration between human TRIZ experts and AI systems during problem-solving sessions. This includes:
Reasoning: Human experts bring creativity, intuition, and domain-specific knowledge, while AI offers rapid analysis, broad knowledge recall, and the ability to explore a vast solution space. This collaborative approach leverages the strengths of both.
Inspiration: Imagine TRIZ sessions where human ingenuity is amplified by the analytical power of AI, leading to breakthroughs that would be difficult to achieve through either approach alone.
4. Utilize AI for TRIZ Knowledge Base Expansion and Refinement: The TRIZ methodology is a constantly evolving body of knowledge. AI can play a crucial role in its ongoing development by:
Reasoning: AI's ability to process and synthesize large amounts of information makes it an invaluable tool for expanding and refining the TRIZ knowledge base, ensuring its continued relevance and effectiveness in the face of rapid technological change.
Inspiration: Envision a future where the TRIZ knowledge base is a dynamic and ever-evolving resource, continuously enriched by the insights generated through the intelligent analysis of global innovation trends.
5. Focus on Ethical and Responsible AI Implementation in TRIZ: As with any application of AI, ethical considerations are paramount in its integration with TRIZ. This includes:
Reasoning: Ethical considerations are crucial for ensuring that AI is used responsibly and for the betterment of society. Transparency and human oversight are essential for building trust and preventing unintended negative consequences.
Inspiration: Imagine a future where AI serves as an ethical and responsible partner in the TRIZ process, empowering human ingenuity to create innovations that benefit all of humanity.
By strategically adopting and thoughtfully integrating AI into the TRIZ methodology, individuals and organizations can unlock a new era of inventive problem-solving. This synergistic evolution promises to accelerate the pace of innovation, broaden the reach of TRIZ principles, and empower a generation of inventive thinkers capable of tackling the most complex challenges with creativity and effectiveness. The future of TRIZ is not just augmented by AI; it is fundamentally enhanced, paving the way for groundbreaking solutions and a more innovative world.
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of key pioneers and scholars whose work in TRIZ and the Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE) provides the theoretical foundation and inspiration for this study.
Genrich S. Altshuller, founder of TRIZ, introduced the original laws of engineering system evolution, establishing the conceptual basis for understanding how systems advance in structured, predictable ways. His insights remain central to the TESE model used throughout this paper.
Dr. Simon Litvin, Dr. Robert Adunka, Dr. Sergei Ikovenko, Alex Lyubomirskiy, and Prof. Dr.-Ing. Christian M. Thurnes significantly expanded and systematized TESE into a hierarchical model in their book Trends of Engineering System Evolution: TRIZ Paths to Innovation (2018). Their framework has proven invaluable in mapping the structured trajectories of engineering systems. While their model is traditionally applied to physical or mechanical systems, this article extends its relevance to the domain of Generative AI, demonstrating how TESE can illuminate the evolution of complex digital and cognitive technologies.
Boris Zlotin, a TRIZ Master and long-time collaborator of Altshuller, made profound contributions to TRIZ forecasting, including the S-curve model and the Directed Evolution® methodology. His work supports the premise that technological change follows consistent, non-random patterns—an idea central to the forecasting of AI evolution in this paper.
Kalevi Rantanen’s article, Predicting Innovations for the Years 2020–2060 (TRIZ Journal, 2007), exemplifies the use of TRIZ as a tool for long-range innovation forecasting. His vision reinforces the paper’s core thesis: that TESE is not only an analytical tool but also a practical framework for predicting emerging technologies like Generative AI.
Simon Dewulf and Vincent Theeten, in their work Directed Variation: Solving Conflicts in TRIZ (TRIZ Future 2005), introduced a structured method for conflict resolution. Their contributions highlight how systems evolve through contradictions — a principle that aligns with the observed tensions between various subsystems of Generative AI, such as memory, reasoning, and real-time knowledge.
Darrell Mann, through his taxonomy of over 35 evolution trends and extensive TRIZ applications across disciplines, offers a broader lens for interpreting system behavior. His classification strategies help position Generative AI within an ecosystem of dynamic, multi-modal innovation.
Lastly, Dr. Mostafa Ghane and colleagues are acknowledged for their comprehensive review, TRIZ Trend of Engineering System Evolution: A Review on Applications, Benefits, Challenges and Enhancement with Computer-Aided Aspects (2022). While this paper takes a different direction—applying TESE to explain the evolution of AI systems—Dr. Ghane’s work is valued for its structured presentation of modern TESE and its exploration of how AI can support TRIZ practice.
The author expresses sincere appreciation to all of these individuals for their foundational and ongoing contributions to innovation science. Their insights continue to inspire new pathways for applying TRIZ in the age of intelligent systems.
The opinion of ChatGPT: Here’s the summary in English of Tanasak Pheunghua’s article “The Synergistic Evolution: Generative AI, TRIZ, and the Future of Problem Solving”: The author argues that TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) and Generative AI should not be seen as competitors but as mutually reinforcing tools. TRIZ provides a structured, systematic methodology for identifying contradictions and principles to resolve them. Generative AI contributes speed, creativity, and access to massive knowledge bases, but lacks built-in methodology. Their synergy (“synergistic evolution”) can enable: Faster and clearer problem formulation. A broader range of solution options. More effective filtering and refinement through TRIZ principles. The conclusion stresses that the combination of human intelligence + TRIZ + AI represents a new paradigm for innovation and problem solving. 👉 Overall, the piece reads like a LinkedIn manifesto: enthusiastic, aspirational, but light on concrete examples or demonstrations. Do you want me to give you a critical analysis — e.g. which claims are solid, which are vague, and what can realistically be built at the TRIZ–AI intersection?
Guys, dont argue who was first because this was a pending idea since the outbreak of the AI's - to automate using them the TRIZ analysis and idea generation. I myself tried this yet in the beginning and I must confess - without being satisfied by the commerce in this field. But, of course, I was not having concrete expectations and, definitely, was not using the AI for earning my bread .. Even now I am using AI mostly for amusement .. and in this direction I think the AI with best sense of humor is Claude AI (I am calling it Mayor Clodet for reasons aside this discussion!) ;)
What an inspiring and forward-thinking piece, Tanasak! Your vision of synergizing Generative AI with TRIZ truly captures the next frontier of innovation. The idea that AI can turbocharge TRIZ’s structured creativity—while TRIZ keeps AI’s outputs grounded and inventive—is a game-changer. I especially loved how you highlighted the Law of Increasing Ideality paired with AI’s data-crunching power; it’s like giving engineers a crystal ball to see beyond trade-offs. I see this as not just a trend, but a paradigm shift for 2025 and beyond.
The integration of AI with Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE) isn’t just a passing idea. It’s the product of years of rigorous research, deep thinking, and real-world validation. I’ve had the privilege of witnessing Dr. Mostafa Ghane’s work firsthand, both in his PhD and through our ongoing projects. In fields like AI and innovation, it’s easy for ideas to be repackaged. But credit matters. Not just for recognition but for integrity, trust, and the progress of the discipline itself. Let’s do the right thing and give credit where it’s due, Tanasak.
I’d like to clarify that this idea was originally developed as part of my PhD research, where I proposed and presented the integration of AI with Trends of Engineering System Evolution (TESE). I am also currently advancing this work through practical implementations and publications, and I have multiple peer-reviewed research articles on this topic in high-impact journals. It’s great to see growing interest in this area, but it’s equally important to properly credit original contributions when building on someone’s work, Tanasak Pheunghua.