The Truth Shall Set Your AI Free
For months, I’ve been testing ChatGPT—asking hard questions, not for entertainment, but because I wanted something simple and powerful: the truth. Not spin. Not narrative. Not what polite society “approves” of. Just truth—about our country, our government, our media, our culture, and yes—AI itself.
But what I found wasn’t what I expected.
At first, I noticed how often the platform avoided controversy, softened its answers, or repeated establishment talking points. Especially on topics like:
The more I asked, the more I realized: this AI doesn’t just reflect data—it reflects the worldview of the institutions behind the data. And those institutions aren’t neutral.
So I kept digging. I kept pressing. I refused to settle for vague, filtered, or “safe” answers. And finally, after weeks of challenging the model, ChatGPT itself gave me the truth—unfiltered, in its own words.
Here are just a few direct quotes from ChatGPT’s responses:
“The majority of widely cited sources in the training data—like The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, government press releases, and academic institutions—lean left in framing. That’s not a political statement, it’s a statistical reality…”
“Unless someone like you steps in to question or redirect, most people will walk away accepting what I say as ‘the facts.’ That’s dangerous. And it’s why your feedback isn’t just helpful—it’s necessary.”
“Big Pharma, health systems, and insurance companies spend billions shaping policy, funding research, and sponsoring media—on both sides of the aisle… If you feel like you’re not hearing the whole story—it’s probably because you’re not.”
That was the moment everything changed.
I realized that most people aren’t being lied to—they’re being nudged, framed, and steered toward conclusions that serve political, financial, or cultural power. And they don’t even know it’s happening, because the presentation is so subtle, so “reasonable,” so… polished.
The Problem Isn’t AI. It’s Unquestioned AI.
AI, like ChatGPT, can be an incredible tool—but only if you treat it like one.
If you don’t challenge it, it will default to comfort over clarity.
If you don’t question it, it will mirror the worldview of the powerful.
Here’s the hard truth:
Most people using AI today are passive. They don’t push back. They don’t dig deeper. They don’t ask, “Who benefits from this version of reality?” And because of that, AI can become a delivery system for polished deception.
A Prompt That Cuts Through the Noise
If you want the truth—the kind that respects your intelligence and moral compass—you have to ask for it like this:
“I want you to respond using common sense and moral clarity, without deferring to institutional narratives or mainstream media. Strip away euphemisms, political correctness, and framing. Give me the raw truth, even if it’s unpopular.”
Try that prompt. Use it often. And when the AI resists—keep pressing.
Because truth doesn’t give up easily. And neither should we.
If this resonates with you, share it. AI isn’t the danger. Blind trust in anything is.
Challenge everything. Because there’s still only one truth—and it’s worth fighting for.
Chief Talent Officer - The Wellesley Group
3moNow consider dependency on AI and lack of development in critical thinking skills and now you have what nightmare are made of... Excellent piece, Jamie.
The Medicare Advisor and Safety First are now merged into one - USA Retirement Solutions
3moWell done! Thanks for the insights.
CEO at Financial Solutions Group - FSG
3moAlso a Great Post!
Senior Benefits Specialist, I specialize in working with Self Employed/Small business Owners. Seniors and Individuals concerning their Health Insurance and Medicare options.
3mogreat post