Understanding Quantum Mechanics is not difficult
Quantum mechanics (QM) is one of the most successful and powerful theories in the history of physics. It describes the behaviour of very small particles, like photons and electrons. While its predictions have been experimentally validated many times, the interpretations of these results can seem counterintuitive, giving rise to all sorts of weird and "spooky" phenomena.
An easy way to understand QM is the double slit experiment. Imagine a barrier with two small slits leading to a detection screen. When waves go through these slits, they interfere and create a pattern. But here's the weird part: if you send the photons one at a time through the slits, they also make this interference pattern as if each photon goes through both slits at the same time and interacts with itself. Yet, placing a detector at the slits to determine each photon's path disrupts this pattern, implying the mere act of observation alters outcomes.
Some say the implications of this experiment are profound as it suggests that the act of observation effects the result or the universe splits into “many worlds” or consciousness is playing a role.
However, this quantum phenomenon can be simply explained using wave functions (WF). Rather than describing photons as distinct particles, they are represented by WFs, encompassing all possible states with respective probabilities that sum to one. As time progresses, the WF evolves and expands in a manner akin to a bubble spreading out from its source. This evolution is precisely and mathematically described by the Schrödinger equation.
When the photon interacts with something, termed a "measurement", the WF collapses to a one specific outcome from the many possibilities. This "measurement" can be a deliberate scientific observation or even a simple interaction, like the photon striking a speck of dust. It is as if the measurement bursts the particle’s WF bubble.
Some say that the photon travels a single specific route or perhaps all conceivable routes across parallel universes. However, in the quantum perspective, there isn't a physical photon journeying through space. There's only the wave function until its collapse. Upon collapse, the WF reconfigures, with all probability now focused on the outcome just observed.
If one attempts to determine the photons path by positioning a detector at one slit, the WF of this detector becomes “entangled” with the WF of the photon. This results in the “decoherence” of the WF, leading to the photon either being detected or not. Even if a photon isn't detected, implying it took the alternate route, the entanglement of the WFs still takes place. Without a detector, the screen causes the decoherence, but now it is too late to stop the interference pattern forming.
In essence, quantum mechanics doesn't involve tangible particles but rather wave functions. Particles like electrons and photons only briefly exist when the WF collapses. If we accept this simple interpretation, QM no longer is spooky, weird or difficult to explain.
“The book of nature is written in the language of mathematics.” -Kepler (1571–1630)
4moIt’s a great mission to make science less intimidating—but let’s not lose sight of what quantum mechanics actually is. It’s not easy. It’s a mathematically rigorous, counterintuitive, and philosophically profound framework that took some of the greatest minds in history decades to formulate—and we still don’t have consensus on how to interpret it. Simplification is great for outreach, but deep understanding will always demand serious study, humility, and time.
Deep Tech Evangelist | Quantum & AI & CFD
4moI like the WF bubble analogy, I think it's helpful to visualize an abstract concept
Core Analysis Influencer | Core Digitisation | Geothermal | Carbon Management | Helium exploration | Critical Minerals | CEO @ Core Specialist Services Limited | Independent Consultant | Innovator | Collaborator |
1ySteve. Are they particles or wave functions? Or both at the same time? Or neither is more likley the truth on a deeper level we havent understood yet. Reality is not real perhaps?
Looking for new opportunities.
2yThere is certainly a paradigm shift, which may be uncomfortable. First, forget the words 'is' and 'is not'. To a quantum physicist, asking the question 'is a photon a particle or a wave' is a meaningless question. Second, quantum physics deals with observations and expectation, and the observations and expectations are determined by the conditions. Third, when explaining quantum phenomena, we sometime try to relate it to normal day experiences, but that can be a leap, because the phenomena are not normal day experiences. So when we say 'the photon, under these conditions, behaves as a particle' we are really saying '....has some observations which make it look similar to our internal mental model of how a particle behaves, but it is not a particle'. So nothing is intuitive. Or something like that.
Petrophysicist
2yCould this argument resolve the incompatibility between QM and General Relativity? In general relativity (GR), gravity is described as the curvature of spacetime (ST) caused by mass and energy, where objects move along geodesics. In quantum mechanics (QM) forces are described by the exchange of particles called force carriers. For gravity, the proposed force carrier is the graviton, but none have been observed and quantum theories of gravity are struggling. This incompatibility could be resolved by proposing that at the moment of the Big Bang there was only Hilbert Space, containing a single very entangled wavefunction (WF) for the universe. The amount of entanglement, or mutual information, between different parts of the WF, defines the ‘distance’ in ST between the different parts. As the WF’s entanglement decreased the curved geometry of ST “emerged”. Now we have ST, gravity can be explained by general relativity. No incompatibility!