Week 28: Step 1 - What Does Life Insurance Actually Cost?
Math.Logic.Wealth™ - The Authoritative Life Insurance Mastery Course
Those who have joined the Tribe have been working together to help our clients understand life insurance costs as simply as possible. Maybe we've been over-complicating this all along. Through our collective research, we think we've found the answer.
A Simple Conversation That Changes Everything
Advisor: "Before we discuss any life insurance features or options, let me answer the most basic question first. What return do you typically expect on your investments?"
Client: "I usually aim for about 8% annually."
Advisor: "Based on your 8% expectation, $100,000 of permanent life insurance would cost you approximately $15,000 in allocated capital."
Client: "Wait, what do you mean by that?"
Advisor: "Think of it like buying a house. A $500,000 house costs $500,000. For you, $100,000 of permanent life insurance costs about $15,000 of your investment capital, based on your personal return expectations."
Client: "That's the clearest explanation I've ever heard. Tell me more."
Why This Step 1 Approach Works
Every allocation decision starts with one fundamental question: What does it cost?
Before consumers can decide whether to allocate any portion of their wealth to life insurance, they need to understand what that allocation actually costs them personally.
This isn't about payment plans or premium schedules. It's about the economic reality of the allocation decision they're considering.
The Consumer's Personal Cost Reality
For our 41-year-old male non-smoker example:
Same person, same coverage, different economic reality based on their own financial assumptions.
This Is Totally New and Unique
STEP 1 isn't just a better way to do something we've been doing. This is a fundamentally different approach to helping consumers understand the best analogy for life insurance as an investment: It's a long-term allocation of their scarce resources.
We're trying to figure out how permanent life insurance fits financially with everything else they're doing. This is the math answer to lifelong financial allocation decisions.
Permanent life insurance deserves to be part of the discussion. The question is whether our approach helps consumers understand this fairly.
A Submission to Our Tribe
I'm asking our Math.Logic.Wealth™ community for feedback on this Step 1 approach. Does it qualify as one of our group's generally accepted principles?
Back to Our First Principle: "Compared to What?"
When considering life insurance as an allocation decision, our GALIP™ first principle becomes powerful:
This makes life insurance much simpler to understand and evaluate.
Let's Do This for Our Future Customers
The consumers we serve deserve better than confusion. They deserve the same cost clarity for life insurance that they get for every other major financial decision.
This Week 28 approach might be the simple truth we've been avoiding.
Join Us Thursday
Date: This Thursday July 15th Time: 9:00 AM EST or 12:00 PM EST Topic: Long-Term Assumptions - Step 1 Consumer Education
Let's talk about it:
The Step 1 methodology for transparent cost communication
We'll demonstrate:
The Math.Logic.Wealth™ Step 1 Revolution
Step 1 gives consumers what they deserve: a clear, honest answer to "What does this cost me?" before discussing anything else.
When consumers understand the allocation cost based on their own assumptions, they can make informed decisions about whether life insurance belongs in their financial plan.
Join us Thursday as we explore how Step 1 transforms consumer education and creates the foundation for everything else we do.
Ready to learn the Step 1 approach that puts consumers in control of their allocation decisions?
#MathLogicWealth #Step1 #LifeInsuranceCost #AllocationDecisions #ConsumerEducation #InsuranceTransparency #FinancialPlanning #Week28 #LongTermAssumptions #HurdleRate #GALIP #ConsumerFirst #FinancialAdvisors #InsuranceAdvisors #TransparentPricing
Principal at Honour Life | Approved Independent | Insurance Investments Specialist | Master Financial Advisor - Philanthropy
3wOk, that makes sense. What is Step 2? The IRR of the policy? I feel like the policy vs the investment would have a sideways Y graphic. Insurance starting with a MUCH higher IRR, and ending up in the same/similar place at Life Expectancy.
27+ Years Helping Lawyers Build for Life After Law — Without Sacrificing Today | Clarity • Intention • Legacy | Founder, The Wealthy Lawyer
3wSimplicity is key when talking "cost" of the coverage to a client... and Jeffrey, this is a great way to discuss it.