Why AI is going to be crazy big
What is causing the current boom in artificial intelligence, or AI, innovation?
My current thinking is that there are six primary drivers of the current AI wave.
More importantly these drivers are now in a self-reinforcing cycle which will accelerate the pace of AI innovation and its increasing ubiquity in consumer and business apps.
VC funding in pure-play AI startups has increased more than 10-fold since 2010 according to CB Insights. IBM has committed $1bn to Watson, the firm’s AI division. Google has acquired DeepMind and several other AI-oriented startups like. Baidu, Microsoft, Amazon and other tech majors are equally arming up. And startups like Sentient Technologies have amassed war chests.
The six forces
- Moore’s Law
- The Data Explosion
- Internet Collaboration
- Software eating the world
- API’s and Micro-service architecture (!)
- The law of AI Lock-in (!)
The two forces marked with (!) I credit to Dr Barney Pell, founder of natural language search enginer PowerSet, AI expert and friend.
Moore’s Law
Moore’s Law is now positively astronomical, driving availability of faster and cheaper computing.
Data explosion
There is an explosion in the availability and production of data. A large part of this is user generated content from the social networks. But there are new classes of data from health-monitoring and gene exploration. Internet of things will contribute sensor data to this growing volume. More data, means more things for algorithms to train from, more correlations to find and more predictions to make.
New forms of collaboration
Github, arxiv, Kaggle, in fact, the internet in toto, have made information more accessible to scientists, researchers, engineers and hackers.
Internet collaboration has made the cycle of demonstration, knowledge exchange, experimentation and enhancement much shorter.
This allows us to stand on the shoulders of giants faster than ever.
Software is eating the world
In today’s world, most business problems start to look like software problems.
In short, as Marc Andreesen of Andreesen Horowitz has argued, software is eating the world:
More and more major businesses and industries are being run on software and delivered as online services — from movies to agriculture to national defense. Many of the winners are Silicon Valley-style entrepreneurial technology companies that are invading and overturning established industry structures. Over the next 10 years, I expect many more industries to be disrupted by software, with new world-beating Silicon Valley companies doing the disruption in more cases than not.
Pell’s Observation on APIs and Microservices
In my discussions with Barney Pell, he made a crisp point about the nature of the problem domain. Prior to loosely-coupled architectures, of microservices mediated by APIs, software was large and monolithic.
These systems were multi-factor, entangled, spaghetti systems that did many things. They were menhir stacks of code. This meant problems were themselves general, multifactor and ambiguous. This is the sort of problem at which humans excel. AIs don’t.
In today’s loosely coupled architectures, APIs and microservices have constrained the AI problem. Essentially these are well-defined contracts between components. This means a human intelligence has less of an advantage; and it becomes more of a level playing field for an AI.
And this in part explains the boom in AI as a service startups we’re seeing.
Pell’s law of AI lock-in
The second point of discussion which Barney observed is how the business system changes once AI starts to confer an advantage to a given industry participant.
AI systems have become the key to product success in certain classes of products. As soon as AI gets baked in to the the quality of product and its commercial success, the CEO has an ineluctable rationale for investing more in the AI . This creates a lock-in. Competitors need to respond. Because without AI you are nowhere.
Hence the law of AI lock in.
This has happened in several key industries, such as video games and internet search, where you now simply cannot compete unless you have world-class AI. And these is spreading to more sectors: robotics, defence, finance and more.
What now?
We are at the early days of a Cambrian explosion of AI. Many veteran tech watchers might roll their eyes and say ‘not again’. For non-techies, it may be another part of a hype cycle they don’t understand. These six accelerants might explain why its time is now.
If you enjoyed this, please subscribe to my Exponential Digest of AI and other interesting topics. (Once a week, very interesting).
Director, ProCreative Pty Ltd; Author "Simple tools for clarity, understanding and betterment"
10yI think there's an interesting juxtaposition in this topic that is not being fully addressed. We see humans doing things autonomously, and, in a similar manner, robots and the like, seemingly doing the same. However, there's an aspect to AI that is not being addressed -- advances in quantum physics have revealed that reality is fundamentally of a nonlocal nature. Machines can't model faster-than-light nonlocal interconnections. While quantum computers seek to utilize superpositions, we do it intuitively, and creatively. In other words, mind spreads out in space, and is not constricted to the "bits and pieces" in our heads. I don't believe AI will (ever) replicate human creativity and intuition, reliant as it is on nonlocal awareness, and ... (in alignment with evidence from delayed choice experiments; measurement of the Leggett-Garg Inequality), precognitive awareness as well.
Software Engineer
10yI can't wait for the Enterprise computer to enter the home. I've even thought about trying to build one myself. Me: Computer, what's the weather going to be like today? Com: Windy and rainy and 11 degrees. Me: (Better get Jimmy's warm jacket out.) Me: Does Jimmy have any school events today? Com: Yes. There is a school fete at lunch time. Me: (He'll probably need five dollars for that.) Me: Could you order a vegemite sandwich and apple juice for Jimmy's lunch please Computer? I'm running a bit late. Com: ... ... A vegemite sandwich and apple juice has been ordered for Jimmy's lunch. Me: Thanks. Com: You're welcome.
H&R Block
10yIt struck me as I was reading this article that most companies I worked for were made to kick and scream when asked to upgrade their technologies. Most refused upgrades only until it was almost impossible to communicate with other business systems. Or there was a possibility of loosing business...But what I found most disparaging was that the IT decision makers were the ones who were the most technologically challenged/naïve people with regard to support, safety and security in their systems processes. When I think about the production of transistors/per minutes being compared to the numbers of stars in Milky Way, I start to get a little nervous and wonder if the United States Bullion Depository, often known as Fort Knox isn't being filled with transistors rather than gold. Especially since China is supposedly cornering the market. Oh and yes. I should limit my reading. My mind does go off in some strange little tangents...
Founder at Time University
10yI love your precise researched engaging writing style. I believe Hugh Ching / PostScience group is into Fuzzy Logic, Self-programmed machine intelligence, and fifty-plus variable problems. Quantum AI techniques will likely be the popular technology in years to come.
Nothing in here about actual AI development or whether true AI can ever be realized - just the progression of technology with no philosophical underpinnings. I think this is symptomatic of our culture - making lots of technological gadgets without asking tough philosophical questions about whether we need such things or if we are living the way we want to live.