Why Firefighting Isn’t a Strategy: Building Proactive Teams
If you’ve worked in any fast-paced environment—you’ve probably experienced the adrenaline of fixing problems on the fly. A machine goes down, a shipment is delayed, a customer calls with a complaint—and suddenly, everyone drops what they’re doing to “put out the fire.”
And while there’s something admirable about how quickly teams can react in a crisis, here’s the truth:
Firefighting isn’t a strategy.
It’s not scalable. It’s not sustainable. And over time, it wears your people down, erodes trust, and stifles improvement.
If your team is constantly in reactive mode, you’re not managing a process—you’re managing chaos. And that’s where leadership comes in. Proactive teams don’t just respond to problems—they work together to prevent them. And the key to building that kind of team culture? Small, consistent improvements that make things better before they break.
Let’s talk about what that looks like and how you can move your team from firefighting to forward-thinking.
The Real Cost of Constant Firefighting
On the surface, firefighting can feel productive. You’re solving problems. You’re saving the day. But underneath that adrenaline rush is a hidden cost:
Important work gets delayed.
Employees burn out.
Communication breaks down.
Quality suffers.
Improvement takes a back seat to urgency.
Over time, firefighting becomes the norm. You reward speed over stability. You become dependent on “heroes” who can jump in and fix things at the last second. But what happens when those people leave? What happens when the next big problem hits and you don’t have time to catch your breath?
That’s not team management—that’s crisis management.
What Proactive Teams Do Differently
Proactive teams don’t wait for things to go wrong. They build systems, habits, and culture that keep things running smoothly—and improve them over time. They ask questions like:
Where are we most vulnerable?
What keeps going wrong?
What could we fix now to save time later?
They document problems, dig into root causes, and apply small fixes that prevent big issues. This could be something as simple as:
Visual cues that signal when materials are running low.
Daily team huddles to talk through potential issues.
Standard work instructions to reduce variation.
A “stop the line” culture that empowers people to act early.
These aren’t massive overhauls. But they create margin—space for people to think, learn, and improve instead of running from crisis to crisis.
Leadership’s Role in Ending the Firefighting Cycle
Here’s the tough truth: If your team is stuck in firefighting mode, chances are leadership unintentionally allowed it to happen.
Maybe you didn’t create space for improvement conversations. Maybe you celebrated the people who fixed problems, but not the ones who prevented them. Or maybe your metrics focused more on output than on stability.
But here’s the good news: You also have the power to change it.
Proactive teams don’t happen by accident—they’re built by leaders who model curiosity, encourage critical thinking, and celebrate sustainable wins.
Start by asking better questions. Give your team permission to pause and solve instead of sprint and scramble. And most importantly, shift your definition of success from “we made it through the day” to “we made it better than yesterday.”
Firefighting might feel heroic in the moment, but it’s not how great teams operate. If you want lasting improvement in your organization, you need to build a workplace where problems are surfaced early, addressed openly, and prevented systematically.
That starts with leadership. That starts with culture. And most importantly, that starts with a team committed to making things better—not just getting by.
Because at the end of the day, putting out fires won’t move your business forward. But preventing them? That’s how you build something that lasts.
VP DBS @ Danaher | Continuous Improvement, Executive Coaching | I help successful C-level leaders improve by 1% each day, every day
1moThanks, Patrick Adams, for sharing this insightful article. I wonder if the step from firefight (and reactive) to proactive is too far. Is there a "stabilised" phase in between whe performance and credibility improve (but are not quite as proactive and preventive as we would like them to be)?
General Manager I GAICD I MBA I Business Transformation I Sales, Marketing, Digital, Operations Leader I Manufacturing
1moSo true! This is 100% part of my personal ethos. Plan for sustainable operations over winning the day by fire fighting in the chaos.
Inventory & Purchasing Manager at Redd Remedies
1moWhen firefighting is consistently celebrated in a culture, leaders shouldn’t be surprised to find themselves increasingly surrounded by arsonists.
Process improvement | Continuous improvement | Quality management | Operational excellence | Leadership
1moI fully stand behind every paragraph! So accurate and so relevant! Thank you Patrick Adams !
Enhancing Performance Through Human Factors, Lean Six Sigma, and Systems Thinking | LSSBB | Founder, Systems Scholar LLC.
1moThanks Patrick! Terrific article. I agree that many production managers and engineers view firefighting as "just part of the job" and "we get the job done, so why does it matter"? But in reality, constantly combating problems and chaos is simply waste that adds no value to the end produce or service. And, yes, having the same problems crop up again and again and again only serves to frustrate, demoralize, and burn out employees. Better to work to eliminate those wastes, establish SOPs to combat backsliding, and cultivate a culture (led and supported by the leaders of the facility!!!) that rewards spending time finding ways to consistently improve rather than fight fires! Excellent insights that should be required reading for any production team. Thanks!