Why Forward-Thinking Developers Are Rethinking Parking
Parking may not be the most exciting topic in real estate development, but its impact on a developer’s bottom line is anything but boring. In fact, parking policies are undergoing a seismic shift across the U.S., and forward-looking developers are taking notice. Developers are cutting construction costs and adapting to changing policies and consumer preferences by building fewer off-street parking spaces—or none at all.
The following 4 factors are what's driving this shift:
1. No More Parking Minimums
Cities across the U.S. are eliminating parking minimums at a breakneck pace. 86 municipal and state governments have removed these outdated policies, according to the Parking Reform Network . A parking minimum is a mandate from a city that a new construction project is required to build a certain amount of parking, even if the developer does not want to or the demand for that location does not justify it. The removal of these parking minimums lets the free market do its work, versus monopolizing an auto-centric lifestyle. As a developer, if you think that parking is needed, you can use your capital and space to build parking - or you can decide to shift towards alternative transportation modes, bringing many other benefits to your development. For example, an e-bike and e-scooter fleet would cost less than constructing a single car parking space.
2. Transportation Demand Management: Shifting Away from Cars
In more than 25 major markets, developers are now required to actively support alternatives to driving through Transportation Demand Management (TDM) policies. These policies aim to reduce Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTs) by incentivizing biking, walking, and public transit use. Instead of overbuilding parking, developers are encouraged to invest in infrastructure and programs that promote sustainable transportation options.
This shift isn’t just about compliance; it’s about creating value. By reducing reliance on cars, developers can save on construction costs while offering tenants a more affordable and sustainable lifestyle. Plus, these strategies align with broader urban trends that prioritize walkability, reduced emissions, and healthier communities.
3. Rising Costs of Car Ownership
The cost of owning and operating a car continues to climb each year, exceeding $12,000 per year, or $1,000 per month, according to AAA. As alternative transportation options become more accessible and convenient, many people, especially the youngest generation, are rethinking car ownership altogether. Meanwhile, the average car sits idle 95% of the time. Savvy developers are recognizing this trend and shifting their focus away from parking-heavy projects.
As owning a car has become increasingly expensive,
4. The True Cost of Overbuilt Parking
Overbuilding parking not only adds significant costs to a development but also drives up the cost of housing. By reducing or eliminating parking, developers can lower costs and pass those savings along to residents.
Overbuilding parking also leads to an increase in traffic congestion and air pollution, while preventing walkability, and penalizing those without automobiles. Oversupply of parking means a higher chance of free parking, further incentivizing people to drive and not use a more sustainable and healthier mode of transportation, leading to increased emissions. As LA-based city planner and author M. Nolan Gray put it in an Urban Land Institute report, “there’s no such thing as ‘free’ parking. Providing parking adds to the cost per unit.” It’s very clear that we have overbuilt parking in the past; now how can we dig ourselves out of it?
Conclusion
Forward-thinking developers who embrace TDM policies, prioritize alternative transportation, and innovate with new mobility solutions are not just building profitable projects—they are shaping the sustainable, community-focused cities of tomorrow.
Please share this with real estate developers that are seeking guidance on how to enable the cost savings and impact that is possible with these strategies.
Self-Employed: Senior Chartered Transport Engineer
3moHı Davıd, you’ve raised good points. In brief I would like to make the following brief points. I would also add that we should always consider giving parking spaces for those who use a vehcile for their trade (preferably electric charge points). Most importantly consideration must be given to residents/visitors who have a Disabled Blue Badge (5-10% of residental units). And what about visitors, these could be social or traders such as a replacement cooker etc? And in addition people nowadays have online deliveries where do we queue them up. We cannot expect the local highway assets to take the burden of these extra parking demands? I would state that there needs to be a comprehensive Travel Policy document as part of their Planning application of the outlined site - also stating emergency access to all parts of the units. Kind regards Zak
Business Development | Market Research | Research & Development | Strategy Planning + Evaluation | Urban Planning
3moDavid, Nice job concisely explaining the why less parking = more value!
Such an important topic—parking is often overlooked, but it can make or break a project’s feasibility. Love how you’re framing it around both cost savings and smarter mobility options.
co-Founder at City Pads LLC
4moThank you David! This is a great article and 100% in alignment with our philosophy!