Why Labels Like “PaaS” and “Kubernetes Platform” Fall Flat in the Real Enterprise
Red Hat doesn’t want to call OpenShift a PaaS.
And honestly? Most of the enterprise buyers I talk to in the Buyer Room don’t care what it’s called either.
They’re not asking whether something is a PaaS, CaaS, KaaS, or even an “AI platform.” They’re asking:
The distinction between “PaaS” and “enterprise Kubernetes platform” might matter to Red Hat’s product marketers—but in practice, it creates confusion rather than clarity. Because whatever you call it, the expectation is the same: a platform that enables teams to build and run applications without having to hand-stitch the entire stack.
PaaS: The Label That Vendors Run From, But Buyers Still Use
Red Hat avoids the PaaS label because it implies simplicity, lack of control, and maybe even “Heroku” in people’s minds. Fair. OpenShift is more capable than that.
But in trying to avoid that connotation, they’ve drifted toward vague terms like “hybrid application platform” or “Kubernetes-based developer experience.” It sounds more enterprise-y, but it tells buyers very little.
Meanwhile, platform teams still use the word PaaS to describe what they’re trying to build: a curated, secure, self-service layer that gives developers velocity without dragging ops into every release.
If your product delivers that—even if it runs on Kubernetes, supports GPUs, and scales to edge—you’re in the PaaS business, whether you like it or not.
What Buyers in the Room Actually Say
In candid conversations inside the Buyer Room, I hear things like:
The taxonomy doesn’t help. The outcomes do
The Takeaway for Vendors
You don’t need to call your product a PaaS. But if you’re marketing to platform teams or enterprise architects, stop obsessing over the label and start showing how you:
If that’s what your platform does, then congratulations—you’ve built a modern PaaS. Now tell that story.
Vital questions in the real-world businesses. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7356218912658579456
Storage Solution Sales at IBM
3wSounds a lot like IBM Fusion HCI....
Cloud | Digital | Infrastructure | Data Centre | Analytics | Security
3wgreat point - too often I have seen pitch decks about hosted Kube assuming that customer needs it for what is typically 20% cost premium without giving the why
In almost 5 years of meeting with OpenShift customers and prospects, this topic has never come up. Nor do they bring up cloud (hyrbid/multi) terminology. Some analysts track revenue in those buckets (especially for the public clouds), but when it comes to customers, we are talking about lots of other things, mainly how we help them solve problems and support their people, applications, and data. OpenShift can be a bit hard to put in a bucket since we deploy across customer data centers, public clouds, and edge environments. You will note that IBM simply categorizes Red Hat as software.
Distinguished Engineer @ ADP Innovation Lab | Platform Strategy | CTO/Trusted Advisor | All opinions are mine
3wFor paas to be a paas it needs to be a platform for some category of applications. Openshift is not a platform for a category of applications. It is infrastructure. If you want to be pedantic, Openshift is IaaS .