Why Reinventing the Wheel in Cybersecurity is Crucial for National Security

Why Reinventing the Wheel in Cybersecurity is Crucial for National Security


The phrase "Why reinvent the wheel?" has often been used to question the necessity of creating something from scratch when an adequate solution already exists. However, when it comes to national security and cybersecurity, sometimes reinventing the wheel is not just an option – it's a necessity.

The GPS Lesson

The US Global Positioning System (GPS) is a testament to this. While it is undeniably one of the most sophisticated and widely used systems globally, its accessibility remains at the discretion of the US government. The 1999 Kargil war incident, where the US denied GPS data access to India, showcases the vulnerabilities countries expose themselves to when reliant on foreign technologies. This incident spurred India to develop its indigenous GPS, NavIC. One could argue it’s another wheel, but for India, it’s a wheel they control.

Dependence on External Communication Platforms

Fast forward to today, where we are heavily reliant on digital communication. A top official noted that agencies were using platforms like WhatsApp and Gmail to convey critical and time-sensitive information. The convenience of these platforms cannot be denied, but neither can the inherent risks. If a nation’s security depends on platforms outside its jurisdiction, there’s potential for access denial, data breaches, or even espionage. More alarmingly, in the event of a cyber attack, if these platforms are disabled, especially since they are controlled by other countries, it could leave us without a reliable means to communicate. This could hinder timely and effective countermeasures, exacerbating the impact of the attack. It’s like building your fortress but handing the keys to someone else.

Network Devices and Potential Backdoors

A significant concern in the cybersecurity landscape is importing network devices believed to have embedded backdoors. These concealed entry points can be a nightmare during cyberattacks, potentially allowing adversaries to disable systems and cripple networks. Given the economy’s reliance on the internet, downtime isn’t just inconvenient; it’s catastrophic. Therefore, it becomes imperative to manufacture these devices domestically, ensuring security from the ground up.

The Limitations of Imported Forensic Tools and Methodologies

The forensic tools and methodologies we adopt, often borrowed from other countries, may not be wholly suited to our unique challenges. The modus operandi of cybercriminals can vary significantly based on regional factors, cultural nuances, and local technologies. While international guidance is valuable, it cannot be the sole blueprint. Like many nations, India requires a customized framework and methodology for addressing and solving cybercrimes that align with its distinct landscape. Furthermore, the pressing need for an indigenous cybercrime investigation framework becomes evident, ensuring that investigations are more streamlined, efficient, and resonate with the nuances of the local digital ecosystem.

Need for Indigenous Cybersecurity Frameworks

Relying on international cybersecurity frameworks might not always align with a country’s specific needs and challenges. Just as India is shaping its privacy laws to cater to its unique socio-political landscape, there’s a pressing need to develop indigenous cybersecurity frameworks. These can be more agile, responsive, and tailor-made, reducing dependence on foreign entities to enact amendments that resonate with our requirements.

The Argument for “Reinventing the Wheel”

In the realm of national security:

  1. Control: Having indigenous solutions gives a country complete control over its tools, data, and access.
  2. Data Sovereignty: Ensuring that data remains within national boundaries is crucial. It not only complies with data protection laws but also reduces the risk of foreign surveillance and potential data misuse.
  3. Customization: Homegrown solutions can be tailored to address specific threats and challenges unique to the region or country.
  4. Redundancy: Even if global tools are in use, having a backup developed in-house ensures continuity in emergencies.
  5. Economic Growth: Investing in domestic cybersecurity solutions can spur innovation, create jobs, and boost the tech industry.

Conclusion

The digital era has made the world more connected than ever. But with this interconnectivity comes a web of dependencies. For matters as critical as national security and cybersecurity, relying solely on external solutions is a gamble. Sometimes, “reinventing the wheel” is less about redundancy and more about safeguarding a nation’s interests in an unpredictable digital world. So, the next time someone asks, “Why reinvent the wheel?” – the answer might just be, “Because it’s our wheel.”

Venkata Satish Guttula

Gaurav Agarwaal

Visionary Leader | Reimagining Consulting in the GenAI Era | Turning AI Hype into Enterprise Velocity | Vibing with Data | Architecting Trust, Velocity & Growth

1mo

Thought-provoking piece, Satish. Sometimes, reinventing the wheel is exactly what national security demands—because control, not convenience, defines resilience. Relying on borrowed tools and frameworks may work in the short term, but long-term sovereignty needs homegrown innovation. It’s not about building from scratch; it’s about building with intent. Are we owning our cybersecurity future—or just renting it?

Practical Risk assessment of National Cyber Risk. Where too much of dependence on other demographic countries poses a big and unimaginable threats. @

New Risks are identified with a focused vision based on the much more dependence on other countries, which may become opponent from friend in no time. New way to think on National Security.

Ashish Pradhan

CTO, Quick Heal / Seqrite | Former VP Symantec, Exabeam, CTO Indusface

1y

Exceent point.. The reins of our nation's digital infrastructure and security must be in our own hands. Govt must continue to support indigenous tech companies in becoming a competent alternative to global tech behemoths.

Ajay C Bhayani

Cyber Evangelist | Bridging Security Innovation & Business Strategy | Empowering CIOs, CTOs, CISOs & CROs with Future-Proof Cybersecurity Controls

1y

Nice thought Venkata Satish Guttula, CISA, CISM, CDPSE, CDPP, It is our wheel, and we should build it... So, When there is an instance of national security ideally, it should not be called as reinventing of wheel because security has to be aligned to the business and business requirements are different for each organisation, each enterprise and each Country. I am not saying that we should not follow the leading Frameworks like NIST, COBIT but align that to Business and sectoral needs of the country that would aide to protect the sovereignty of our Country. It has to be a Indian #Cybersecurity Framework that would consider online protection of the citizens of the country, the major & minor businesses, defence and space and critical infrastructure. From this vertical specific cyber security mandates or guides can be established. Similar to what we have as a IT act & Privacy Act.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore content categories