Why Scalar Math Is the Key to Understanding UAPs: Phasing Through the Void

Most of what we call “flight” is a battle with resistance. A lift against gravity, a thrust against drag, a force and counterforce in endless Newtonian negotiation. But what if movement didn’t have to push? What if propulsion wasn’t about force, but about phasing?

This is the question at the heart of our work at NRGscapes LAB. Across years of UAP observation in Karijini, the Pilbara, and in Perth and other outback and coastal regions, we’ve documented and analysed what appear to be intelligently controlled orb and other orb-like craft and objects that do not accelerate, do not arc with inertia, do not interact with their surroundings the way any known airframe does.

Instead, they blink into space, hover without thrust, then vanish. Orbs that rotate not to steer, but to shift. Rods that spiral not to move, but to transition. Other orb-like craft and objects that orientate not for position, but to phase.

These are not objects or craft moving through space, they are moving with space.

And to understand that, we had to throw out more than just old assumptions. We had to start from the beginning. We had to start with observations, with extensive image analysis and then to question the mathematics itself. If the maths was flawed, then the physics would be flawed. And if the physics was flawed then none of our publicly accepted science was going to explain what we were observing.

Our breakthrough came not in the recorded footage alone, but in linking data and image analysis to its mathematical decoding. Classical vector-based physics could describe nothing of what we observed. There was no thrust vector. No aerodynamic profile. No force curve. The data and our image analysis profiling defied the framework. So we went back, far back, to James Clerk Maxwell’s original quaternion equations, long before Heaviside and Gibbs flattened them into linear vector algebra.

What we found were missing terms, scalar potentials, mathematical components that modern physics quietly edited out, but which describe how energy can flow not in a direction, but through a change in state. In other words: not force, but phase.

These scalar fields, when allowed back into the equations, suggested that energy could accumulate and release along geometries invisible to our conventional instruments. They described how fields could curl into vortices, not just across space but through dimensions. And suddenly, the movement of the orbs and other orb-like craft and objects, their erratic yet effortless transitions made sense. They were not propelling themselves through space, They were modulating. They were not moving by force, they were slipping through variations in the fabric of the field, a scalar field.

This isn’t just a theoretical patch. It’s a complete reframing of how motion might occur when inertia is no longer a limiting factor. These objects reveal a post-Newtonian paradigm, where field alignment, not mechanical impulse, determines mobility.

Scalar mathematics gives us the language to describe this, to describe the nature of UAP and to reverse engineer what we are observing. Data driven observational research and analysis gives us the empirical key to this lock, a mathematical lock hidden away. Scalar mathematics unlocks a coveted technology. Together, the language and the research give us a blueprint, not just to understand UAPs, but to build scalar resonant mobility systems (SRMS) that don’t push against the world… but step through it.

This is why we link the math. Not to explain what we already know, but to make visible what we’ve always missed. The sky has changed. Our equations, our physics and our science must too.

And at NRGscapes LAB, that is exactly what we are doing.

Dr Andrew Morgan

NRGscapes LAB