Why the Simple Formula for Pediatrician Pay Misses What Really Matters in Primary Care

Why the Simple Formula for Pediatrician Pay Misses What Really Matters in Primary Care

Primary care pediatricians get paid based on a simple formula:

  1. How many patients you see

  2. How much you get paid per visit (contract reimbursement rates)

  3. How many days you work

  4. How much profit your employer wants from your services

That’s it. Notably absent? Any connection to training, experience, expertise, or effectiveness.

It doesn’t matter if you’ve been practicing for 20 years or two. Your compensation isn’t tied to whether you prevent hospitalizations, make accurate diagnoses, or provide exceptional care. The system is built on volume, not value—on speed, not skill.

This financial structure doesn’t just affect pediatrician salaries—it shapes how medicine is practiced. And right now, it’s failing.

The Disconnect: What Pediatrician Pay Ignores

1. Training and Experience Aren’t Rewarded

A pediatrician with 20 years of experience, deep clinical judgment, and a proven track record earns the same per visit as a brand-new graduate. Unlike other professions where expertise leads to higher earnings, in primary care:

  • There’s no built-in salary increase for experience. If a doctor wants a raise, they usually need to see more patients, not demonstrate better care.

  • Fellowship training or additional certifications don’t boost pay. A pediatrician with subspecialty expertise (like complex care or behavioral pediatrics) is often reimbursed at the same rate as a general pediatrician.

  • Diagnostic skill doesn’t matter financially. A doctor who accurately diagnoses and manages conditions in primary care—preventing unnecessary referrals—doesn’t get paid more than one who reflexively sends patients to specialists.

2. Effectiveness and Quality Don’t Impact Compensation

Unlike in other industries where performance can influence salary, in pediatric primary care:

  • Preventing ER visits isn’t financially rewarded. A pediatrician who successfully manages a child’s asthma or avoids an unnecessary hospitalization doesn’t see a financial benefit.

  • Keeping patients healthy isn’t incentivized. Well-child visits, which emphasize prevention, are reimbursed at lower rates than sick visits.

  • Patient satisfaction and trust don’t impact pay. A doctor who builds long-term relationships and provides exceptional care earns the same per visit as one rushing through appointments.

If two pediatricians see the same number of patients, they get paid the same—even if one is providing far better care than the other.

Where Does the Money Actually Go?

Before a pediatrician ever sees a paycheck, much of the revenue they generate is absorbed by costs that have little to do with improving patient care.

1. Administrative Overhead: The Hidden Cost of Running a Practice

A significant portion of a pediatrician’s revenue disappears into administrative expenses, including:

  • Billing and Coding – Ensuring every visit is properly documented, coded, and submitted for payment. A single error can delay or deny reimbursement.

  • Insurance Negotiations – Managing contracts with insurers, each of which pays different rates and frequently denies claims.

  • Faxing, Chasing Faxes, and Prior Authorizations – Endless paperwork for referrals, medication approvals, and documentation compliance.

  • Scheduling and Staffing – Managing appointment logistics, cancellations, and rescheduling while ensuring the office runs efficiently.

  • Regulatory Compliance – Meeting HIPAA, OSHA, and state requirements, which require dedicated staff and resources.

These costs don’t improve patient outcomes, yet they eat up 30-60% of total revenue.

2. The Cost of Actually Providing Good Care

Pediatricians who want to provide high-quality, thorough care face a major financial disincentive.

  • Longer Visits Mean Less Pay. A doctor who spends extra time with complex patients earns less than one who rushes through quick cases.

  • Preventative Care Saves Money—But Not for the Doctor. Pediatricians who reduce future health issues through well-child visits, vaccine counseling, and early intervention don’t see higher pay.

  • Care Coordination is Unpaid Work. Time spent reviewing lab results, calling families, consulting with specialists, and managing chronic conditions isn’t reimbursed.

3. The Employer’s Cut: How Much Profit Must a Pediatrician Generate?

Pediatricians working for private practices, hospitals, or corporate groups don’t control how much of their revenue they actually take home. Employers expect physicians to generate 2-3 times their salary in revenue to cover overhead and profit margins.

This means primary care doctors are pressured to see more patients, not necessarily provide better care.

The Loss of Team-Based Care: The First Cuts in a Broken System

Great primary care isn’t just about the physician—it’s about a team. But because team members don’t generate direct revenue, they’re often the first to be cut when budgets tighten.

The Unseen Value of Non-RVU Producers

Most healthcare systems base productivity on RVUs (Relative Value Units)—a system that assigns value only to billable physician services. But team-based care relies on professionals who don’t generate direct billing:

  • Social Workers – Helping families with housing, food insecurity, and school services—critical work that isn’t reimbursed.

  • Behavioral and Mental Health Specialists – Managing ADHD, anxiety, and depression in primary care reduces ER visits and hospitalizations, but isn’t prioritized financially.

  • Nurses and Care Coordinators – Answering parent questions, managing chronic diseases, and following up on test results—work that improves outcomes but isn’t billable.

  • Medical Assistants and Front Desk Staff – Handling the logistical side of patient care, but often underpaid or overworked due to cost-cutting.

Without these team members, pediatricians are forced to take on more administrative and coordination work, reducing the time they spend actually practicing medicine.

Should We Be Surprised That Primary Care Is Struggling?

Primary care isn’t failing because pediatricians lack dedication. It’s failing because the system actively disincentivizes what makes great care possible.

  • There is no financial reward for keeping kids out of the hospital.

  • There is no incentive to spend extra time with a family in crisis.

  • There is no compensation for coordinating care across multiple specialists.

  • There is no built-in financial recognition for experience or quality.

Instead, pediatricians are forced to churn through visits, absorb administrative burdens, and function without the team-based support that makes care better.

The Path Forward: Rethinking How We Value Primary Care

If we want better healthcare outcomes, we need to change the way we compensate primary care. Possible solutions include:

  • Shifting from volume-based pay to value-based incentives – Rewarding pediatricians for keeping children healthy, reducing unnecessary ER visits, and managing chronic conditions effectively.

  • Investing in team-based care – Ensuring that nurses, social workers, and behavioral health professionals are seen as essential, not expendable.

  • Reducing administrative waste – Streamlining billing, prior authorizations, and paperwork so pediatricians spend more time with patients and less time with forms.

  • Recognizing experience and quality in compensation – Paying more for clinical expertise, continuity of care, and patient satisfaction—not just raw visit numbers.

Until we fix the way primary care is funded, pediatricians will continue to be overworked, underpaid, and forced to work in a system that values efficiency over excellence. And ultimately, it’s the patients who suffer the most.

What you describe as pressures to increase volume I call survival mode finances. Another take is profit driving employer decisions that translate to problems for delivery team members. I hate to see the volume to value mantra because outcomes are so outside of the control of health care delivery teams. It appears that where some influence can be made the patient populations are overutilizing and have much to too much access to care. In contrast most Americans most behind lack access, suffer from underutilization and inappropriate utilization, and have the most fixed in place negative outcomes. They also suffer from fewer and lesser delivery team members - another nasty side effect of worst Medicare, Medicaid, and private plans concentrated in these vast regions. One size does not fit all and almost every policy for 42 years has hurt most Americans most behind - especially in basic health access. After 2065 at the earliest time for sufficient primary care for all, then we can fine tune. But with half enough for 40 - 50% of the population, the greater concern is more discrimination by designs set up by people who worship designs and their kind of innovation. Our kind is most and best team members for best 1 on 1

Like
Reply

This is a great work from you. It is sad that those that design health care do not understand these basics.

Like
Reply
Bryan R. Fine, MD, MPH

Let Patients Text | Solution Masochist ;)

7mo

Has always been fascinating that there is no model that makes it different financially for an experienced clinician versus a newby to care for a patient. Imagine this lawyerly analogy and you'll...be annoyed.

Jessica Giles, CPC

Coding Investigator-Special Investigation Unit-MHI

7mo

FYI you can get paid for coordination of care. The HCPCS code is billed on a monthly basis and is reimbursed for a 30 day period. If you want to learn more about it please reach out to me. It’s actually more simple to document to support billing than you think!

Danielle Vaeth

Strategic Growth & GTM Leader | Behavioral & Digital Health | Clinician-Centered Commercial Strategy | Connector. Closer. Builder.

7mo

this is jarring

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore content categories