If your CXO buys Cloud based solutions without IT involvement, is it Shadow IT ?

  • At a marketing conference the CMO was childishly wide eyed seeing technology options on display which he was unaware of. His IT team had been talking about some of the solutions and benefits that could be created for the enterprise, he had not focused on them leaving it to his team. Now having seen possibilities, he wanted to get the tools and technology into his fold as soon as possible. So he asked the vendor to deep dive with his team to ascertain how quickly they could adopt the solutions.

    After the song and dance, demo and reference checks, he was convinced that the solution is exactly what he needed. It was superior to the current laborious manual process followed which always ended up just a little late in comparison to required timeline. IT had been chasing him for a long time, but he did not understand technology; so he had deflected the discussion to his team who were always looking at the operational aspects of the solutions rather than the big picture that needed to be defined.

    The CIO and the IT team gave up the chase since it appeared to be a futile exercise; other parts of the enterprise were happy to collaborate and implement new age solutions and appreciated their contributions. Thus when the CMO saw the solutions on display at the conference he was overawed and wanted to make up lost time as soon as possible. The vendor convinced him that he did not need support from IT as the solution was cloud based and required no infrastructure except an internet connection.

    Weeks later the solution was procured and deployed quickly; it was easy enough to use, did not require training, worked on their laptops and most smartphones, allowed analytics that the business wanted, and was quite affordable with monthly subscription which he could fund from his budget. Integration to existing data sources was not considered since his team had almost all the data in spreadsheets that they used to conduct analysis and created customer engagement models; the CMO believed he had a good deal.

    Months later he presented outcomes from his new baby in the Management Committee Meeting to a round of applause which he beamingly accepted. The success story continued for a while as the marketing team leveraged the solution which provided better outcomes than the earlier manual way of working. The dream run would have continued except that they reached a plateau and to leverage new functionality now required help from IT to integrate with existing data sources to move to the next level.

    Success creates arrogance that can be the undoing not just for the individual but also for the team. Emboldened by success of his earlier indiscretion, he hired resources to address the requirement. Unfortunately to get what he needed, there was no way to circumvent IT and thus he approached the CIO who feigned surprise and looked adequately stunned at the request. The IT vendor had apprised him of the purportedly illicit relationship which the CIO did not confront since it was running of its own steam.

    The CIO did not throw tantrums neither did he chastise the CMO; his demeanor and approach to the request had the CMO confused on whether the request would be reported to the CEO or discussed in the Management Committee meeting or the CIO will now ask for his pound of flesh or he would just acquiesce to the request. The CMO did know that if he did not get the required data feed, the fairy tale would come to a horrific end which would also mean opening the proverbial can of creepy crawlies.

    With benevolence the CIO asked for an all hands meeting with Marketing in which he explained the impact of the CMO’s request. There was a need to understand the elements required, security of data in motion and at rest, ability to maintain the interface while ensuring that exceptions are addressed, and finally data quality. In the manual world, marketing team had increasingly spent time managing some of these issues. The CMO realized the complexity and sensing no animosity with relief agreed to work together.

    Cloud based models will entice CXOs to explore uncharted territories as they have low entry barriers and easy pickings to validate use cases. I believe that CIOs should proactively offer assistance to such forays rather than blocking them considering business ownership increases chances of sustained adoption. Conventional mindset would paint this as Shadow IT or a threat to the supremacy of the CIO; I see this as an extended arm of IT which can create win-win propositions for business, IT, and vendors.

    Muralidharan Ramachandran

    Independent Director I Multiple Board Committees Member I Technology, Cybersecurity & Digital Transformation Advisor | Angel Investor | Ex. CEO/CIO/CTO/CISO/Business Head

    9y

    Very well said Arun. CIO's need to be proactive in creating the right balance with the stake holders. Most CIO's invariably land up highlighting the negative side more often than the positive side resulting in loss of faith and stakeholders directly becoming gullible to external service providers. Showcasing small quick wins supported by medium to long term strategic plan to integrate with existing legacy systems is a key attribute that the CIO has to demonstrate.

    Like
    Reply
    Rakesh Shah

    Seasoned Professional | Ex TATA (TCS, Tata Power, Tata AIA Life) | Ex Axis Bank | Ex GNFC (IT Biz)

    9y

    Great post Sir and I am fully agree with the comments posted by Manoj which is the truth of the day. When CIO is telling NO to collaborate, transform and sitting with legacy then definitely such action is must.

    This looks like a case of IT - Business political rivalry! I have had Experience of dealing with arrogant IT yuppies telling me you have no option and the business bringing in an external consultant to bring in convenient solutions. I have also had experience with a seasoned IT team with business knowledge adding value in a sensible way. Needless to say, the dog should wag the tail and it's important that the dog and the tail know who they are!

    Rajesh Dangi

    Technology Advisor, Founder, Mentor, Speaker, Author, Poet, and a Wanna-be-farmer

    9y

    Technology infusement into organisation was always deem to be CIO's baby. This myth is getting busted in different industry domains. If the business needs are not discussed and debated by and between CxO table tjen the failures are common. I see this picture on daily basis when jnteraction with clients who purchased the Cloud services for the greater good of the organization but becomes challenging to retrofit to the culture & usage behavior of their organisation going beyong the technology landscape. This is infact a very sensetive phase of any organization going agile on tech refresh making build or buy decisions. The conflict gets personal and leads to delays and loses constancy of purpose. It is no longer a CIO's job to find solutuons all slone for the business nor for the business to get into something looking at one side if tge coin. Build the business and Run the business are two sides of dame coin and it gets flipped too often unfortunately; thats the reality.

    To view or add a comment, sign in

    Others also viewed

    Explore content categories