Streamlining Feasibility and Cost Estimation in Manufacturing

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Streamlining feasibility and cost estimation in manufacturing means using smart methods and technology to quickly assess if a project is possible and predict how much it will cost, helping manufacturers make better decisions and avoid costly surprises. By focusing on both the practicality of new ideas and the accuracy of cost forecasting, companies can save time and resources.

  • Try simulation modeling: Use digital tools like discrete event simulation to spot bottlenecks and test different scenarios before making changes in your production line.
  • Choose the right estimating method: Apply techniques such as activity-based costing, parametric estimating, or zero-based costing depending on your project’s phase and available data.
  • Update estimates as details emerge: Refine your cost projections with more accurate data during each project stage, from initial feasibility study to final engineering design.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Vimal Raj Mahadevan

    Global Costing Specialist | Digital Transformation Advocate | Leader in Cost Optimization | GEN AI Architect | n8n Automation | LangChain | Leveraging AI for Smart Costing .

    2,736 followers

    Advanced Cost Estimation Techniques for Manufacturing Excellence 🚀" In the competitive manufacturing world, accurate cost estimation is the key to profitability and efficiency. Here are advanced techniques that can transform your cost estimation process: 1. Should Cost Modeling 💡 Determines the ideal cost of a product by analyzing materials, labor, and overhead. Helps negotiate better prices with suppliers. Benchmarks costs against industry standards. Example: In plastic injection molding, should cost modeling identifies savings in material selection and cycle time optimization. 2. Zero-Based Costing (ZBC) 🎯 Starts cost estimation from a "zero base," justifying every expense. Eliminates unnecessary costs and optimizes resource allocation. Encourages a culture of cost-consciousness. Example: In assembly processes, ZBC helps identify and eliminate redundant steps, reducing labor and material costs. 3. Value Engineering (VAVE) 🔧 Focuses on reducing costs while maintaining or enhancing product value. Eliminates redundant processes and optimizes material usage. Encourages cross-functional collaboration. Example: In multi-process manufacturing, VAVE streamlines workflows by integrating sheet metal and assembly processes. 4. Activity-Based Costing (ABC) 📊 Allocates costs based on activities like cutting, welding, and assembly. Identifies cost drivers and inefficiencies. Provides detailed insights into process costs. Example: In sheet metal manufacturing, ABC helps allocate costs for laser cutting, bending, and finishing separately. 5. Parametric Estimating 📈 Predicts costs using historical data and mathematical models. Ideal for high-volume production processes. Provides accurate cost forecasting. Example: In machining, parametric estimating predicts costs based on part complexity, material type, and machine rates. 6. ERP Integration for Cost Estimation 🌐 Integrates data from design, procurement, production, and finance. Provides real-time cost tracking and accurate forecasting. Enables scenario analysis for better decision-making. Example: In large-scale manufacturing, ERP systems like SAP automate cost calculations and improve collaboration across departments. Key Takeaways: 🔑 Accurate cost estimation drives profitability and efficiency. 🔑 Each technique has unique strengths—choose the one that aligns with your process. 🔑 Technology and collaboration are key to optimizing costs. 💬 Which cost estimation technique do you use in your manufacturing processes? 👉 Share your experiences or challenges in the comments—let’s learn from each other! 🔗 Interested in diving deeper into cost estimation? Let’s connect and discuss how these techniques can transform your operations! #CostEstimation #ShouldCostModeling #ZeroBasedCosting #ValueEngineering #ActivityBasedCosting #ParametricEstimating #ERP #ManufacturingExcellence #CostOptimization #LeanManufacturing #OperationalEfficiency #vimalrajmahadevan

    • +2
  • View profile for Krish Sengottaiyan

    Senior Director, Industrial & Manufacturing – Helping Manufacturing Leaders Achieve Operational Excellence & Supply Chain Optimization | Thought Leader & Mentor |

    28,154 followers

    I’ve seen bottlenecks destroy production lines—here’s how I would eliminate them before they hit the bottom line Elevating operational efficiency is more than a goal; it’s a strategic imperative for industry leaders. For executives focused on maximizing profitability, Discrete Event Simulation (DES) is a game-changer. Here’s how DES can transform your production line from a complex operation into a streamlined, profit-generating machine. 𝗧𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 DES models your production line, accurately representing every process and bottleneck. This isn’t just a digital replica—it’s a decision-making platform. By analyzing scenarios, you can predict outcomes and implement strategies for real-world improvements. 𝗘𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗸𝘀 DES pinpoints exactly where your production line slows down. By targeting these areas, you can speed up operations and reduce costs, ensuring resources are fully utilized. 𝗢𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 In manufacturing, resources are often stretched thin. DES tests different resource allocation strategies without disrupting operations, leading to more efficient use and direct cost savings. 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗔𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 Imagine increasing output without new equipment or expanding your workforce. DES makes this possible by simulating changes in line configuration or scheduling, ensuring maximum efficiency. 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁-𝗜𝗳” 𝗦𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘀 In a constantly evolving landscape, agility is key. DES offers a risk-free environment to test scenarios like introducing new equipment or altering schedules, helping you make informed strategic decisions. 𝗔𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗢𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗕𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 A balanced production line is essential for maintaining efficiency. DES simulates different workload distributions, ensuring smooth operation and reducing costly disruptions. 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮-𝗗𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 DES turns complex data into actionable insights. Regularly updating your simulation model keeps your production line optimized in real-time, boosting efficiency and positioning your organization as a leader in manufacturing innovation. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗗𝗘𝗦 😊 For Operational leaders and C-level executives, DES isn’t just about optimizing operations—it’s about driving tangible results. By leveraging DES, you can turn data into dollars, making smarter decisions that directly impact your bottom line. In a world where efficiency is key, DES offers the strategic advantage needed to lead with confidence and achieve sustained success. ------------------------------------------------------- Looking to stay ahead in your game? ♻️ Repost and follow Krish Sengottaiyan for valuable insights!

  • View profile for Ir. M. Fadhil Budiman, PMP®, PMI-SCP™, APEC Eng

    PMP Certified Electrical Construction Leader (Owner’s Side) | Driving Progress on Major Oil & Gas Capital Projects

    4,153 followers

    Cost Accuracy of FS vs FEED vs DED The accuracy of cost estimates varies depending on the phase of the project, from the initial feasibility study to the detailed engineering design (DED). Each phase involves different levels of detail and certainty, which impacts the precision of the cost estimates. Here's an overview of the expected accuracy for each phase: 1. **Feasibility Study** - **Purpose**: To assess the viability of a project before significant resources are committed. - **Detail Level**: Low. Rough estimates based on preliminary data and assumptions. - **Accuracy Range**: Typically -30% to +50%. - **Methods**: Conceptual estimating techniques, analogous estimates, parametric models, or expert judgment. - **Considerations**: High level of uncertainty due to limited information. Includes rough order-of-magnitude (ROM) estimates. 2. **Front-End Engineering Design (FEED)** - **Purpose**: To refine project scope, define major components, and develop a more precise budget. - **Detail Level**: Moderate to high. More detailed than feasibility, but not as comprehensive as DED. - **Accuracy Range**: Typically -15% to +30%. - **Methods**: Detailed quantity take-offs, preliminary design specifications, vendor quotes, and more accurate cost databases. - **Considerations**: Includes preliminary engineering and design work, risk assessments, and early procurement planning. 3. **Detailed Engineering Design (DED)** - **Purpose**: To finalize all project designs, specifications, and procurement plans. - **Detail Level**: High. Comprehensive and detailed engineering and design. - **Accuracy Range**: Typically -5% to +15%. - **Methods**: Detailed engineering drawings, complete material take-offs, finalized vendor and subcontractor quotes, and detailed cost databases. - **Considerations**: Most precise phase with minimized uncertainties, incorporating all finalized details of the project. Best Practices to Enhance Accuracy: 1. **Data Quality and Detail**: Use high-quality data and detailed designs at each phase to improve accuracy. 2. **Experience and Expertise**: Leverage the experience of project managers, engineers, and cost estimators. 3. **Historical Data**: Utilize historical project data to inform estimates and validate assumptions. 4. **Contingency Planning**: Include appropriate contingency allowances to manage unforeseen changes. 5. **Regular Reviews**: Continuously update and refine estimates as more information becomes available. 6. **Software Tools**: Employ specialized cost estimation software to enhance precision and manage complex data. By following these practices, you can ensure that your cost estimates are as accurate and reliable as possible, providing a solid foundation for successful project management and execution. #ProjectManagement #CostEstimation #Project

Explore categories