Adapting to Technology in Modern Warfare

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Adapting to technology in modern warfare means shifting military strategies and equipment from traditional, heavy platforms to data-driven, autonomous systems powered by advanced software, artificial intelligence, and robotics. This approach redefines how battles are fought, focusing on speed, information sharing, and automation rather than just the size or strength of forces.

  • Embrace autonomy: Invest in drones, robotics, and AI-powered systems to carry out surveillance, targeting, and decision-making tasks that previously relied on human operators.
  • Prioritize information: Build secure digital networks and sensor connections to gather, share, and analyze battlefield data quickly, giving your team an edge in both planning and response.
  • Accelerate innovation: Streamline procurement and encourage partnerships with technology companies to rapidly adopt commercial breakthroughs and stay ahead of evolving threats.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Josef José Kadlec

    Co-Founder at GoodCall | 🦾HR Tech - AI - Talent Sourcing - Linkedln - Automation | 🪖Defence, Dual-use & MilTech Industry Consultant+Investor 🎤Keynote Speaker 📚Bestselling Author 🏆 Fastest Growing by Financial Times

    46,778 followers

    💡 From Steel to Software: How Weapons Have Become Code-Driven Modern missile systems are no longer defined primarily by propulsion or aerodynamics — but by code. What was once a mechanical or chemical challenge has evolved into a software-defined system, where autonomy, guidance, and decision-making are increasingly driven by embedded algorithms. A “self-controlled” missile today integrates several layers of computational intelligence: - Inertial Navigation and Kalman Filtering for sensor fusion and drift correction. - Computer Vision and Target Recognition using convolutional or transformer-based neural networks. - Adaptive Guidance Laws that use reinforcement learning or real-time optimization to adjust trajectories dynamically. - Mission Management Software that executes conditional logic — deciding, for example, when to re-target, abort, or engage under uncertain data. These systems blur the line between mechanical engineering and autonomous robotics — and between civil and military innovation. The same AI models that enable autonomous vehicles, satellite tracking, or industrial inspection can be repurposed for target identification and dynamic flight control. This is the essence of dual-use technology: innovations born in commercial domains that can rapidly migrate into military contexts through software transfer, not physical manufacturing. This shift transforms defense R&D itself. The critical advantage is no longer only in materials or payloads, but in algorithmic superiority — speed of adaptation, data integration, and software reliability under extreme conditions. As weapons systems become code-centric, the challenge for policymakers, engineers, and ethicists alike is ensuring responsible autonomy — where control, accountability, and safety are not lost in the abstraction of software. In the age of algorithmic warfare, the sharpest edge is no longer steel — it’s software. #Defence #Miltech #Defense #DefenseTechnology #AutonomousSystems #DualUse #AIinWarfare #GuidanceSystems #SoftwareDefinedWeapons #EthicalAI #InnovationSecurity

  • View profile for Luca Leone

    CEO, Co-Founder & NED

    34,466 followers

    The UK has just published its most comprehensive defence review in 25 years, and it reveals a military on the cusp of its biggest technological transformation since the Second World War. The review's most striking finding isn't about threats or spending—it's about how warfare itself is being fundamentally redefined by technology. As the document starkly notes, drones now kill more people than traditional artillery in Ukraine, and military advantage increasingly comes from speed of innovation rather than size of forces. The technological revolution outlined is comprehensive: Artificial Intelligence becomes central to everything. The review calls for a protected Defence AI Investment Fund and a digital targeting web by 2027 that connects sensors, decision-makers, and weapons across all domains in real-time. Data and digital systems are no longer optional extras—they're foundational to every military capability. Autonomous systems transform the battlefield equation. The UK will establish a Defence Uncrewed Systems Centre by February 2026, moving toward a high-low mix where 20% crewed platforms control 40% reusable autonomous systems and 40% single-use effectors like attack drones. This isn't just about adding drones—it's about completely reimagining how forces operate. Space and cyber become contested battlegrounds. A new CyberEM Command launches by end-2025 to coordinate operations in cyberspace—the only domain under daily attack. Meanwhile, space capabilities become critical as China and Russia's combined satellite fleets grew 70% in recent years, with quantum technologies promising to revolutionise both encryption and navigation. Innovation cycles accelerate dramatically. Defence procurement must shift from 6.5-year contract cycles to three-month rapid commercial exploitation, with a new UK Defence Innovation organisation receiving a ringfenced £400 million annual budget to harness commercial breakthroughs. Advanced weapons reshape deterrence calculations. From hypersonic missiles travelling five times the speed of sound to directed energy weapons like the UK's DragonFire system, the review highlights how precision, range, and speed are transforming military mathematics. This isn't just military modernisation—it's recognition that the character of warfare has changed more in the past decade than in the previous century. The question for defence industries and tech companies is clear: are you ready for this transformation? #DefenceTech #Innovation #AI #AutonomousSystems #DefenceReview #UKDefence

  • The U.S. Army’s Transformation Initiative must start with a core truth: the decisive battle is for information, not terrain. That fight increasingly unfolds in the air littorals—the contested zone at lower altitudes where drones, attack helicopters, loitering munitions, and electronic warfare systems collide. In the latest Next Army commentary from CSIS Futures Lab, I argue that future maneuver depends on a new kind of skirmisher—manned-unmanned teams capable of sensing, deceiving, and striking faster than the enemy can react. In this fight, winning requires: - Apaches with AESA radar directing fires and identifying high-value targets - Gray Eagle STOL drones acting as runway-independent hunter-killers - TITAN nodes that fuse multi-domain sensor data through AI/ML at machine speed - Cannon-based counter-UAS systems turning legacy weapons into dual-purpose air defenses This isn’t just a call for new kit—it’s a theory of future combat. The Army shouldn’t cut air cavalry; it should reimagine it as the decisive force in the fight for tempo, initiative, and advantage. 📖 Read the full article: https://lnkd.in/e24-RW4p #NextArmy #InformationWarfare #MultiDomainOperations #ArmyTransformation #CSIS #CSISFuturesLab

  • View profile for Richard Gwilliam

    Entrepreneur | Business Disruptor | Rebel Evangelist for Innovation

    11,961 followers

    20-40-40: The Future of British Land Warfare Today’s battlefield is unrecognisable from even a decade ago, and the British Army knows it. The new “20-40-40” doctrine unveiled in the Strategic Defence Review is a quiet revolution in how we fight. It shifts us away from conventional mass and toward distributed lethality, autonomy, and survivability. ➡️20%: Tanks and armoured platforms remain, but held back, used precisely, not prolifically. ➡️40%: Single-use strike drones, cheap, effective, expendable. ➡️40%: Reusable drones for ISR and long-range lethality, our eyes and our sting. This isn’t theory. It’s a direct adaptation from Ukraine’s battlefield. Swarming drones, precision artillery, and AI-led autonomy are dominating 21st-century warfare. The days of heavy armour leading the charge are gone. This new strategy doesn’t just change how we deploy, it changes who can innovate. UK SMEs and startups working in autonomy, sensor fusion, AI, and drone tech must now be part of the fight. Procurement must open up. It’s time to modernise not just our kit, but our thinking. #DefenceInnovation #BritishArmy #204040 #DroneWarfare #StrategicDefenceReview #UkraineLessons #MilitaryAI #FutureForce #UKDefence #AutonomyInWarfare https://lnkd.in/dV-SyUX9

  • View profile for Trevor Hough

    Find me at the intersection of National Security, Tech, and Data: Strategic Advisor | National Security Policy and Risk Analysis Practitioner | Mentor | Executive Change Leader and Team Builder | Learner

    5,999 followers

    Lots of posts about Operation Spiderweb so I gave it a few days for the dust to settle before offering a couple thoughts. In the 10 days since Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb, we've learned (or relearned?) a few key points.  To refresh: utilizing ~117 drones launched from concealed trucks, the operation reportedly damaged or destroyed over 40 Russian military aircraft, including surveillance planes and 10% of their strategic bombers. Battle Damage Assessments will vary, but it looks like no Ukrainian personnel were lost in this attack, which was entirely drone-based. Ukrainian SOF could have attempted a similar operation but at far greater risk to the lives of their operators. One lesson that stood out to me is the continuing shift in military strategy, where software-defined warfare plays an increasingly central role. The integration of AI-driven ATR systems enabled a number of these drones to autonomously identify high-value targets, even in GPS-denied environments, by leveraging pre-programmed visual recognition algorithms. As conflicts become more technologically advanced, the adoption of Automated Target Recognition (ATR) and AI-driven platforms will be crucial in maintaining both a strategic edge and the tactical edge of shortening the sensor-to-shooter time. Automated Target Recognition (ATR) software such as TurbineOne's industry-leading Frontline Perception System (FPS) stands at the forefront of this transformation, enabling military systems to identify, classify, and engage targets with unprecedented accuracy and speed - all driven by operator-created and tailored models at the edge of the battlefield, whether on land, sea, or air. The top of any autonomy stack needs to be edge-first ATR software. Edge-first because operators have to own the models and be able to create and update them as battlefield conditions change. This increases both model effectiveness and trust. For both warfighters and technologists, this operation serves as a compelling case study on the integration of advanced software systems on-board military collection and targeting systems at the edge of the battlefield, where there may not be any cell or cloud connectivity. It highlights the necessity for continued investment in AI and ATR technologies to adapt to the changing dynamics of warfare.  If you're in the drone, collection, satellite, or ATR line of work - let's talk!   #MilitaryInnovation #ATR #AIinDefense #OperationSpiderweb #ModernWarfare #DefenseTechnology

Explore categories