This document has not been cited yet.

1. ——— (2018): “Prosocial behavior and policy spillovers: A multi-activity approach,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 149, 356–371.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
2. ——— (2020): “ANCOVA power calculation in the presence of serial correlation and time shocks: A comment on Burlig et al.(2020),” Working Paper, University of Gothenburg.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Allcott, H. and J. B. Kessler (2018): “The Welfare Effects of Nudges: A Case Study of Energy Use Social Comparisons,” Forthcoming, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Allcott, H. and T. Rogers (2014): “The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation,” American Economic Review, 104, 3003–37.

5. Altmann, S., A. Grunewald, and J. Radbruch (2022): “Interventions and Cognitive Spillovers,” Review of Economic Studies, 89, 2293–2328.

6. Archsmith, J. E., A. Heyes, M. J. Neidell, and B. N. Sampat (2021): “The Dynamics of Inattention in the (Baseball) Field,” Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

7. Betsch, T., S. Lindow, C. Engel, C. Ulshöfer, and J. Kleber (2015): “Has the world changed? My neighbor might know: effects of social context on routine deviation,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 50–66.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Brandon, A., J. A. List, R. D. Metcalfe, M. K. Price, and F. Rundhammer (2019): “Testing for crowd out in social nudges: Evidence from a natural field experiment in the market for electricity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 5293–5298.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Burlig, F., L. Preonas, and M. Woerman (2020): “Panel data and experimental design,” Journal of Development Economics, 144, 102458.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Byrne, D. P., L. Goette, L. A. Martin, A. Miles, A. Jones, S. Schob, T. Staake, and V. Tiefenbeck (2022): “The habit forming effects of feedback: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment,” SSRN Discussion Paper No. 3974371.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Cairns, J. and R. Slonim (2011): “Substitution effects across charitable donations,” Economics Letters, 111, 173–175.

12. Calzolari, G. and M. Nardotto (2017): “Effective reminders,” Management Science, 63, 2915–2932.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
13. Caplin, A. and D. Martin (2017): “Defaults and attention: The drop out effect,” Revue économique, 68, 747–755.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Carlin, B. I., S. Gervais, and G. Manso (2013): “Libertarian paternalism, information production, and financial decision making,” Review of Financial Studies, 26, 2204–2228.

15. Castro, J. F., D. Velásquez, A. Beltrán, and G. Yamada (2020): “Spillovers and Long-Run Effects of Messages on Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence from Peru,” Tech. rep., SSRN Discussion Paper No. 3755391.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Cattaneo, M. D., P. Cheung, X. Ma, and Y. Masatlioglu (2021): “Attention Overload, ” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.10650.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Control -0.12 ∗∗∗ 0.16 ∗∗∗ 0.13 ∗∗∗ -0.03 -0.10 -0.08 0.00 0.00 -0.04 ∗ -0.01 0.00 -0.01 0.01 (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.02) (0.07) (0.05) (0.03) (0.03) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.03) (0.02) N 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 1020 1018 2040 2040 Adj. R2 0.11 0.16 0.12 0.05 0.29 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.07 0.04 0.01 0.08 0.18 Mean (Control) 0.79 0.49 0.66 0.87 0.89 1.62 0.29 0.62 0.91 0.99 0.99 0.77 0.90 Std.dev. 0.41 0.50 0.47 0.34 0.99 0.77 0.45 0.49 0.28 0.12 0.11 0.42 0.30 Panel B: Reminder vs. Control (no feedback study; 523 individuals) Wash Hands Rinse Clean Tools After Clean Surface After Check Throw out Remove Safe Keep In Beginning After Veggies After Meat Veggies Veggies Meat Veggies Meat Temperature Bread Cat Order Time Reminder vs.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Control -0.15 ∗∗∗ 0.16 ∗∗∗ 0.06 ∗ -0.03 -0.12 ∗ -0.18 ∗∗∗ 0.18 ∗∗∗ 0.08 ∗∗ -0.01 0.00 -0.00 -0.04 0.02 (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.02) (0.07) (0.06) (0.03) (0.03) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.03) (0.02) N 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 1018 1017 2036 2036 Adj. R2 0.13 0.17 0.10 0.05 0.27 0.28 0.19 0.19 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.11 0.20 Mean (Control) 0.79 0.49 0.66 0.87 0.89 1.62 0.29 0.62 0.91 0.99 0.99 0.77 0.90 Std.dev. 0.41 0.50 0.47 0.34 0.99 0.77 0.45 0.49 0.28 0.12 0.11 0.42 0.30 Panel B: ManyReminders vs. Control (no feedback study; 507 individuals) Wash Hands Rinse Clean Tools After Clean Surface After Check Throw out Remove Safe Keep In Beginning After Veggies After Meat Veggies Veggies Meat Veggies Meat Temperature Bread Cat Order Time ManyReminders vs.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Control (1033 individuals) Wash Hands Rinse Clean Tools After Clean Surface After Check Throw out Remove Safe Keep In Beginning After Veggies After Meat Veggies Veggies Meat Veggies Meat Temperature Bread Cat Order Time 0.26 ∗∗∗ 0.44 ∗∗∗ 0.27 ∗∗∗ -0.00 -0.10 ∗∗ -0.07 ∗ -0.04 ∗ -0.02 -0.02 0.00 0.00 -0.03 -0.01 (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.04) (0.04) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.02) (0.02) N 4132 4132 4132 4132 4132 4132 4132 4132 4132 2066 2065 4132 4132 Adj. R2 0.22 0.32 0.22 0.09 0.29 0.33 0.18 0.26 0.13 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.18 Mean (Control) 0.60 0.42 0.64 0.82 0.78 1.50 0.22 0.61 0.77 0.97 0.99 0.77 0.84 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.38 0.97 0.85 0.42 0.49 0.42 0.17 0.11 0.42 0.36 Panel B: ManyReminders vs.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Damgaard, M. T. and C. Gravert (2018): “The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising,” Journal of Public Economics, 157, 15–26.

21. de Haan, T. and L. Jona (2018): “’Good Nudge Lullaby’: Choice Architecture and Default Bias Reinforcement,” Economic Journal, 128, 1180–1206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. De Quidt, J., J. Haushofer, and C. Roth (2018): “Measuring and bounding experimenter demand,” American Economic Review, 108, 3266–3302.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. DellaVigna, S. and E. Linos (2022): “RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units,” Econometrica, 90, 81–116.

24. Dewey-Mattia, D., K. Manikonda, A. J. Hall, M. E. Wise, and S. J. Crowe (2018): “Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks—United States, 2009–2015,” MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67, 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Dhalmahapatra, K., S. Das, and J. Maiti (2022): “On accident causation models, safety training and virtual reality,” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28, 28–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp, and G. G. Wagner (2011): “Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 522–550.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Dolan, P. and M. M. Galizzi (2015): “Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 1–16.

28. Duarte, F. and J. S. Hastings (2012): “Fettered consumers and sophisticated firms: evidence from Mexico’s privatized social security market,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.

29. EFSA and ECDC (2018): “The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017,” EFSA Journal, 16, e05500.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Ek, C. (2017): “Some causes are more equal than others? The effect of similarity on substitution in charitable giving,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 136, 45–62.

31. Ek, C. and J. Miliute-Plepiene (2018): “Behavioral spillovers from food-waste collection in Swedish municipalities,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 89, 168– 186.

32. Embi, P. J. and A. C. Leonard (2012): “Evaluating alert fatigue over time to EHR-based clinical trial alerts: findings from a randomized controlled study,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19, e145–e148.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Ericson, K. M. (2017): “On the interaction of memory and procrastination: Implications for reminders, deadlines, and empirical estimation,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 15, 692–719.

34. Farhi, E. and X. Gabaix (2020): “Optimal taxation with behavioral agents,” American Economic Review, 110, 298–336.

35. Filiz-Ozbay, E. and N. Uler (2019): “Demand for giving to multiple charities: An experimental study,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 17, 725–753.

36. Frey, E. and T. Rogers (2014): “Persistence: How treatment effects persist after interventions stop,” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 172–179.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Gabaix, X. (2019): “Behavioral inattention,” in Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1, Elsevier, vol. 2, 261–343.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
38. Gardner, B. (2015): “A review and analysis of the use of ‘habit’in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour,” Health Psychology Review, 9, 277–295.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. Gilbert, S. J., A. Boldt, C. Sachdeva, C. Scarampi, and P.-C. Tsai (2023): “Outsourcing memory to external tools: A review of ‘intention offloading’,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 60–76.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Goulding, J., W. Nadim, P. Petridis, and M. Alshawi (2012): “Construction industry offsite production: A virtual reality interactive training environment prototype,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26, 103–116.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Grubb, M. D. (2014): “Consumer inattention and bill-shock regulation,” The Review of Economic Studies, 82, 219–257.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Grubb, M. D. and M. Osborne (2014): “Biased beliefs, learning, and bill shock,” American Economic Review, 105, 234–271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Hall, J. D. and J. M. Madsen (2022): “Can behavioral interventions be too salient? Evidence from traffic safety messages,” Science, 376, eabm3427.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Handel, B. R. (2013): “Adverse selection and inertia in health insurance markets: When nudging hurts,” American Economic Review, 103, 2643–2682.

45. Heidhues, P., J. Johnen, and B. Kőszegi (2021): “Browsing versus studying: A promarket case for regulation,” Review of Economic Studies, 88, 708–729.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Hummel, D. and A. Maedche (2019): “How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47–58.

47. Hussam, R. and D. Oh (2022): “Negative behavioral transmission,” Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

48. Hussam, R., A. Rabbani, G. Reggiani, and N. Rigol (2022): “Rational habit formation: experimental evidence from handwashing in India,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14, 1–41.

49. Jessoe, K., G. E. Lade, F. Loge, and E. Spang (2021): “Spillovers from behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from water and energy use,” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 8, 315–346.

50. Jimenez-Gomez, D. (2018): “Nudging and phishing: A theory of behavioral welfare economics, ” Tech. rep.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Kahana, M. J. (2020): “Computational models of memory search,” Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 107–138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Kamenica, E., S. Mullainathan, and R. Thaler (2011): “Helping consumers know themselves,” American Economic Review, 101, 417–422.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Koch, A. K., D. Mønster, J. Nafziger, and N. Veflen (2022): “Fostering safe food handling among consumers: Causal evidence on game-and video-based online interventions,” Food Control, 108825.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Lacetera, N., M. Macis, and R. Slonim (2012): “Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4, 186–223.

55. Malmendier, U. and J. A. Wachter (2021): “Memory of past experiences and economic decisions,” SSRN Working Paper No. 4013583.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

56. McKenzie, D. (2012): “Beyond baseline and follow-up: The case for more T in experiments,” Journal of Development Economics, 99, 210–221.

57. Medina, P. C. (2021): “Side effects of nudging: Evidence from a randomized intervention in the credit card market,” The Review of Financial Studies, 34, 2580–2607.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Meer, J. (2017): “Does fundraising create new giving?” Journal of Public Economics, 145, 82–93.

59. Merritt, A. C., D. A. Effron, and B. Monin (2010): “Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344–357.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

60. Nafziger, J. (2020): “Spillover effects of nudges,” Economic Letters, 190, 109086.

61. Neisser, U. and R. Becklen (1975): “Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events,” Cognitive psychology, 7, 480–494.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. Null, C. (2011): “Warm glow, information, and inefficient charitable giving,” Journal of Public Economics, 95, 455–465.

63. Redmond, E. C. and C. J. Griffith (2003): “Consumer food handling in the home: a review of food safety studies,” Journal of Food Protection, 66, 130–161.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

64. Reinstein, D. A. (2011): “Does one charitable contribution come at the expense of another?” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11.

65. Reminder -0.05 0.00 -0.07 ∗∗ -0.00 -0.02 -0.09 ∗ 0.17 ∗∗∗ 0.06 ∗ 0.02 0.01 -0.01 -0.02 0.02 (0.03) (0.03) (0.03) (0.02) (0.07) (0.06) (0.03) (0.03) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.04) (0.02) N 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 1018 1017 2036 2036 Adj. R2 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.31 0.28 0.20 0.18 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.16 Mean (Reminder) 0.68 0.66 0.81 0.84 0.82 1.59 0.31 0.66 0.89 0.98 0.77 0.90 Std.dev. 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.37 0.98 0.80 0.46 0.48 0.31 0.15 0.10 0.42 0.30 Panel B: ManyReminders vs. Reminder (no feedback study; 526 individuals) Wash Hands Rinse Clean Tools After Clean Surface After Check Throw out Remove Safe Keep In Beginning After Veggies After Meat Veggies Veggies Meat Veggies Meat Temperature Bread Cat Order Time ManyReminders vs.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
66. Risko, E. F. and S. J. Gilbert (2016): “Cognitive offloading,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 676–688.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Scallan, E., R. M. Hoekstra, F. J. Angulo, R. V. Tauxe, M.-A. Widdowson, S. L. Roy, J. L. Jones, and P. M. Griffin (2011): “Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17, 7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Seres, G., A. Balleyer, N. Cerutti, J. Friedrichsen, and M. Süer (2021): “Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 192, 765–781.

69. Sherif, R. (2021): “Are pro-environment behaviours substitutes or complements? Evidence from the field,” Working paper, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

70. Spiegler, R. (2015): “On the equilibrium effects of nudging,” The Journal of Legal Studies, 44, 389–416.

71. Sunstein, C. R. (2017): “Nudges that fail,” Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 4–25.

72. Table A.26: Hypothesis 2 and Secondary Hypothesis 2 (last level of module 3) Panel A: Feedback study (509 individuals; N=2036) All actions Reminded actions Reminded actions Never-reminded actions in Reminder in ManyReminders (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) ManyReminders vs. Reminder 0.19 0.20 0.26 -0.11 ∗ -0.10 ∗ -0.10 ∗ 0.34 ∗∗∗ 0.36 ∗∗∗ 0.39 ∗∗∗ -0.15 -0.16 -0.13 (0.19) (0.18) (0.18) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.11) (0.10) (0.10) (0.11) (0.11) (0.11) Adj.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
73. Taubinsky, D. (2013): “From intentions to actions: A model and experimental evidence of inattentive choice,” Working Paper, UC Berkeley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

74. Taylor, R. L. (2020): “A Mixed Bag: The Hidden Time Costs of Regulating Consumer Behavior,” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7, 345– 378.

75. Thaler, R. (1985): “Mental accounting and consumer choice,” Marketing science, 4, 199–214.

76. Thaler, R. H. and C. R. Sunstein (2008): Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, Penguin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
77. Thunström, L. (2019): “Welfare effects of nudges: The emotional tax of calorie menu labeling, ” Judgment and Decision Making, 14, 11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

78. Thunström, L., B. Gilbert, and C. J. Ritten (2018): “Nudges that hurt those already hurting–distributional and unintended effects of salience nudges,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 153, 267–282.

79. Tiefenbeck, V., T. Staake, K. Roth, and O. Sachs (2013): “For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign,” Energy Policy, 57, 160–171.

80. Trachtman, H. (2022): “Does promoting one behavior distract from others? Evidence from a field experiment,” mimeo, Hebrew University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
81. Wood, W. and D. T. Neal (2007): “A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface.” Psychological Review, 114, 843.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. What works best in promoting climate citizenship? A randomised, systematic evaluation of nudge, think, boost and nudge+. (2022). Galizzi, Matteo ; Mourato, Susana ; Banerjee, Sanchayan ; John, Peter.
   In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
   RePEc:ehl:lserod:115032.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Beyond building certification: The impact of environmental interventions on commercial real estate operations. (2021). Holtermans, Rogier ; Clayton, Jim ; Devine, Avis.
   In: Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:93:y:2021:i:c:s0140988320303790.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Nudging Technology Use: Descriptive and Experimental Evidence from School Information Systems. (2020). Bergman, Peter.
   In: Education Finance and Policy.
   RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:623-647.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Motivating bureaucrats with non-monetary incentives when state capacity is weak: Evidence from large-scale. (2018). Maldonado, Stanislao ; Dustan, Andrew ; Hernandez-Agramonte, Juan Manuel.
   In: Natural Field Experiments.
   RePEc:feb:natura:00664.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Harnessing Policy Complementarities to Conserve Energy: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment. (2017). Rundhammer, Florian ; Price, Michael ; Metcalfe, Robert ; List, John.
   In: Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:exc:wpaper:2017-05.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Do The Effects of Social Nudges Persist? Theory and Evidence from 38 Natural Field Experiments. (2017). Rundhammer, Florian ; Price, Michael ; Metcalfe, Robert ; List, John ; Ferraro, Paul ; Brandon, Alec.
   In: Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series.
   RePEc:exc:wpaper:2017-04.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Nudging as a new soft policy tool: An assessment of the definitional scope of nudges, practical implementation possibilities and their effectiveness. (2016). Yildiz, Özgür ; Schwarze, Reimund ; Michalek, Gabriela ; Meran, Georg.
   In: Economics Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:zbw:ifwedp:201618.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Nudging Backward Induction. (2016). Shor, Mikhael ; Price, Michael ; Neilson, William.
   In: Working papers.
   RePEc:uct:uconnp:2016-31.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. A New Approach to an Age-Old Problem: Solving Externalities by Incenting Workers Directly. (2016). Metcalfe, Robert ; List, John ; Gosnell, Greer K.
   In: NBER Working Papers.
   RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22316.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical?. (2016). Schubert, Christian.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:201609.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Social Norms and Information Diffusion in Water-saving Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in Colombia. (2016). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Jaime, Monica Marcela .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0652.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. (2016). Gravert, Christina ; Damgaard, Mette Trier.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0650.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Activity-Aware Energy-Efficient Automation of Smart Buildings. (2016). Cook, Diane J ; Thomas, Brian L.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:8:p:624-:d:75593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Fostering Voluntary Contributions to a Public Good: A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment at Wikipedia. (2016). Gallus, Jana.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00552.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. (2016). Gravert, Christina ; Damgaard, Mette Trier.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00549.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. A New Approach to an Age-Old Problem: Solving Externalities by Incenting Workers Directly. (2016). Metcalfe, Robert ; List, John ; Gosnell, Greer.
    In: Framed Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:framed:00412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. The long-term impact of matching and rebate subsidies when public goods are impure: Field experimental evidence from the carbon offsetting market. (2016). Löschel, Andreas ; Kesternich, Martin ; Romer, Daniel ; Loschel, Andreas.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:137:y:2016:i:c:p:70-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. The dynamics of behavior change: Evidence from energy conservation. (2016). Delmas, Magali ; Asensio, Omar Isaac.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:126:y:2016:i:pa:p:196-212.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Do effects of theoretical training and rewards for energy-efficient behavior persist over time and interact? A natural field experiment on eco-driving in a company fleet. (2016). Wolf, Menas ; Schall, Dominik L ; Mohnen, Alwine.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:291-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Sensitivity of price elasticity of demand to aggregation, unobserved heterogeneity, price trends, and price endogeneity: Evidence from U.S. Data. (2016). Miller, Mark ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:235-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Competition and norms: A self-defeating combination?. (2016). Muûls, Mirabelle ; Martin, Ralf ; Koutroumpis, Pantelis ; Gürgüç, Zeynep ; Muuls, Mirabelle ; Alberts, Genevieve ; Gurguc, Zeynep ; Napp, Tamaryn.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:96:y:2016:i:c:p:504-523.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Why does real-time information reduce energy consumption?. (2016). Tarui, Nori ; Saijo, Tatsuyoshi ; Lynham, John ; Nitta, Kohei.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:173-181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Efficient water-using technologies and habits: A disaggregated analysis in the water sector. (2016). Pérez-Urdiales, María ; Perez-Urdiales, Maria ; Garcia-Valias, Maria Angeles.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:128:y:2016:i:c:p:117-129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Energy efficiency policies in the Caribbean: a manual to guide the discussion. (2016). Guerra, Sergio.
    In: Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones).
    RePEc:ecr:col095:40459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Overcoming Salience Bias: How Real-Time Feedback Fosters Resource Conservation. (2016). Lalive, Rafael ; Tiefenbeck, Verena ; Staake, Thorsten ; Gotte, Lorenz ; Degen, Kathrin ; Fleisch, Elgar ; Tasic, Vojkan.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11480.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Responding to electricity shortfalls: Electricity-saving activities of households and firms in Japan after Fukushima. (2016). Kimura, Osamu ; Nishio, Ken-Ichiro .
    In: Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy.
    RePEc:aen:eeepjl:eeep5-1-kimura.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Electricity demand response in Japan: Experimental evidence from a residential photovoltaic power-generation system. (2016). Tanaka, Makoto ; Ida, Takanori ; Takanori, Kayo Murakami .
    In: Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy.
    RePEc:aen:eeepjl:eeep5-1-ida.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. (2016). Gravert, Christina ; Damgaard, Mette Trier.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:aah:aarhec:2016-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Policy evaluation, randomized controlled trials, and external validity: A systematic review. (2015). Peters, Jörg ; Langbein, Jorg ; Roberts, Gareth.
    In: Ruhr Economic Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:rwirep:589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Social Comparisons, Household Water Use, and Participation in Utility Conservation Programs: Evidence from Three Randomized Trials. (2015). Brent, Daniel ; Olsen, Skylar ; Cook, Joseph H.
    In: Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/683427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Does Information Provision Shrink the Energy Efficiency Gap? A Cross-City Comparison of Commercial Building Benchmarking and Disclosure Laws. (2015). Walls, Margaret ; Palmer, Karen.
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-15-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Do not incentivize eco-friendly behavior - Go for a competition to go green!. (2015). Daskalakis, Maria ; Buhren, Christoph.
    In: MAGKS Papers on Economics.
    RePEc:mar:magkse:201534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Differential and Distributional Effects of Energy Efficiency Surveys: Evidence from Electricity Consumption. (2015). Kniesner, Thomas ; Rustamov, Galib.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9567.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Nudging as a new soft tool in environmental policy. An analysis based on insights from cognitive and social psychology. (2015). Yildiz, Özgür ; Schwarze, Reimund ; Michalek, Gabriela ; Meran, Georg.
    In: Discussion Paper Series RECAP15.
    RePEc:euv:dpaper:21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. The impact of curriculum-based learning on environmental literacy and energy consumption with implications for policy. (2015). Allen, Myria W ; Craig, Christopher A.
    In: Utilities Policy.
    RePEc:eee:juipol:v:35:y:2015:i:c:p:41-49.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector. (2015). Linares, Pedro ; Labandeira, X ; Ramos, A ; Gago, A.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:52:y:2015:i:s1:p:s17-s29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Reducing nonpayment for public utilities: Experimental evidence from South Africa. (2015). Ujhelyi, Gergely ; Szabo, Andrea.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:117:y:2015:i:c:p:20-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. An experimental study on motivational change for electricity conservation by normative messages. (2015). Nishio, Ken-Ichiro ; Komatsu, Hidenori.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:158:y:2015:i:c:p:35-43.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Vielfalt in der ökonomischen Wissenschaft: Verhaltensökonomische Ansätze in der Diskussion. (2015). Weizsäcker, Georg ; Kocher, Martin ; Bartke, Simon ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Gelhaar, Felix.
    In: ifo Schnelldienst.
    RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:24:p:03-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Energy and Material Efficiency Improvements, Compliance Strategies, and Investments in Resource Efficiency: A Cross-Country Study. (2015). Dienes, Christian.
    In: Schumpeter Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bwu:schdps:sdp15004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Curbing adult student attrition. Evidence from a field experiment. (2015). Borcan, Oana ; Barak-Corren, Netta ; Sanders, Michael ; Luca, Michael ; Kirkman, Elspeth ; Linos, Elizabeth ; Soon, Zhi ; Chande, Raj .
    In: The Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
    RePEc:bri:cmpowp:15/335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Curbing adult student attrition. Evidence from a field experiment. (2015). Borcan, Oana ; Barak-Corren, Netta ; Sanders, Michael ; Luca, Michael ; Kirkman, Elspeth ; Linos, Elizabeth ; Soon, Zhi ; Chande, Raj .
    In: The Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
    RePEc:bri:cmpowp:14/335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Curbing adult student attrition. Evidence from a field experiment. (2015). Borcan, Oana ; Barak-Corren, Netta ; Sanders, Michael ; Luca, Michael ; Kirkman, Elspeth ; Linos, Elizabeth ; Soon, Zhi ; Chande, Raj .
    In: The Centre for Market and Public Organisation.
    RePEc:bri:cmpowp:13/335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. The long-term impact of matching and rebate subsidies when public goods are impure: Field experimental evidence from the carbon offsetting market. (2014). Löschel, Andreas ; Kesternich, Martin ; Romer, Daniel ; Loschel, Andreas.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14098.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. The long-term impact of matching and rebate subsidies when public goods are impure: Field experimental evidence from the carbon offsetting market. (2014). Löschel, Andreas ; Kesternich, Martin ; Romer, Daniel ; Loschel, Andreas.
    In: CAWM Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:cawmdp:76.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. The Role of Sales Agents in Information Disclosure: Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2014). Sweeney, Richard ; Allcott, Hunt.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. The Role of Information for Energy Efficiency in the Residential Sector. (2014). Rodríguez, Alberto ; Linares, Pedro ; Labandeira, Xavier ; Ramos, Ana ; Gago, Alberto.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:efe:wpaper:04-2014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Applying Insights from Behavioral Economics to Policy Design. (2014). Madrian, Brigitte.
    In: Annual Review of Economics.
    RePEc:anr:reveco:v:6:y:2014:p:663-688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment. (2013). Non, Arjan ; Neckermann, Susanne ; Dur, Robert ; Bradler, Christiane.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20130038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Site Selection Bias in Program Evaluation. (2012). Mullainathan, Sendhil ; Allcott, Hunt.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-04 07:30:18 || Missing content? Let us know