1. Industry 4.0 and Environmental Protection: The Catalyst Role of Public Financial Support. (2025). Priede-Bergamini, Tiziana ; Cuello-De, Diego ; Lopez-Cozar, Cristina.
   In: The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.
   RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:68:p:111.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Sustainable Practices in Manufacturing SMEs: The Importance of Technological Collaboration between Supply Chain Partners. (2024). Priede-Bergamini, Tiziana ; Cuello-De, Diego ; Lopez-Cozar, Cristina.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:5264-:d:1419103.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Abeysekera, A.P. and Fernando, C.S., 2020. Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, [online] 61, article no. 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.05.003.

2. AE How Family Character Affect the Financing of Environmental Protection Strategies and Energy-Saving Measures 520 Amfiteatru Economic López-Delgado, P. and Diéguez-Soto, J., 2020. Indebtedness in family-managed firms: the moderating role of female directors on the board. Review of Managerial Science, [online] 14(4), pp.727-762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0307-y.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Agostino, M. and Ruberto, S., 2021. Environment-friendly practices: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 329, article no. 129689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129689.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Aragón-Correa, J.A. and Sharma, S., 2003. A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Review, [online] 28(1), pp.71-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925233.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Arranz, N., Arguello, N.L. and Fernández De Arroyabe, J.C., 2021. How do internal, market and institutional factors affect the development of eco-innovation in firms? Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 297, article no. 126692. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2021.126692.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Arzubiaga, U., De Massis, A., Maseda, A. and Iturralde, T., 2023. The influence of family firm image on access to financial resources in family SMEs: a signaling theory perspective. Review of Managerial Science, [online] 17(1), pp.233-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00516-2.

7. Ayuso, S. and Navarrete-Báez, F.E., 2018. How Does Entrepreneurial and International Orientation Influence SMEs’ Commitment to Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from Spain and Mexico: Entrepreneurial and International SMEs’ Commitment to SD. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, [online] 25(1), pp.80-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1441.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Baixauli-Soler, J.S., Belda-Ruiz, M. and Sánchez-Marín, G., 2021. Socioemotional wealth and financial decisions in private family SMEs. Journal of Business Research, [online] 123, pp.657-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.022.

9. Bansal, P. and Roth, K., 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, [online] 43(4), pp.717-736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Bansal, P., 2005. Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, [online] 26(3), pp.197-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441.

11. Barnea, A. and Rubin, A., 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 97(1), pp.71-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z.

12. Belda-Ruiz, M., Sánchez-Marín, G. and Baixauli-Soler, J.S., 2022. Influence of familycentered goals on dividend policy in family firms: A socioemotional wealth approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, [online] 18(4), pp.1503-1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00741-x.

13. Benito-Hernández, S., López-Cózar-Navarro, C. and Priede-Bergamini, T., 2021. Influence of Government Support on Proactive Environmental Strategies in Family Firms. Sustainability, [online] 13(24), article no. 13973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132413973.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R. and Larraza-Kintana, M., 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less? Administrative Science Quarterly, [online] 55(1), pp.82-113. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R., 2013. Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations: Necessity as the Mother of ‘Green’ Inventions. Strategic Management Journal, [online] 34(8), pp.891-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2041.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. Block, J.H. and Wagner, M., 2014. The Effect of Family Ownership on Different Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Large US Firms: Effect of Family Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, [online] 23(7), pp.475-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1798.

17. Broccardo, L., Truant, E. and Zicari, A., 2019. Internal corporate sustainability drivers: What evidence from family firms? A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, [online] 26(1), pp.1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1672.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Burgstaller, J. and Wagner, E., 2015. How do family ownership and founder management affect capital structure decisions and adjustment of SMEs?: Evidence from a bank-based economy. The Journal of Risk Finance, [online] 16(1), pp.73-101.

19. Cirillo, A., Pennacchio, L., Carillo, M.R. and Romano, M., 2021. The antecedents of entrepreneurial risk-taking in private family firms: CEO seasons and contingency factors. Small Business Economics, [online] 56(4), pp.1571-1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00279-x.

20. Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D. and Vasvari, F.P., 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, [online] 33(4-5), pp.303-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003.

21. Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D. and Vasvari, F.P., 2011. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, [online] 30(2), pp.122-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013.

22. Clauß, T., Kraus, S. and Jones, P., 2022. Sustainability in family business: Mechanisms, technologies and business models for achieving economic prosperity, environmental quality and social equity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [online] 176, article no. 121450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121450.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Comino-Jurado, M., Sánchez-Andújar, S. and Parrado-Martínez, P., 2021. Reassessing debtfinancing decisions in family firms: Family involvement on the board of directors and AE How Family Character Affect the Financing of Environmental Protection Strategies and Energy-Saving Measures 518 Amfiteatru Economic generational stage. Journal of Business Research, [online] 135, pp.426-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.060.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. Craig, J. and Dibrell, C., 2006. The Natural Environment, Innovation, and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study. Family Business Review, [online] 19(4), pp.275-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00075.x. Dangelico, R.M., Nastasi, A. and Pisa, S., 2019. A comparison of family and nonfamily small firms in their approach to green innovation: A study of Italian companies in the agri‐ food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, [online] 28(7), pp.1434-1448. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2324.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. De Marchi, V., 2012. Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, [online] 41(3), pp.614-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002.

26. De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L. and Kammerlander, N., 2018. Innovation with Limited Resources: Management Lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, [online] 35(1), pp.125-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jpim.12373.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Dekker, J. and Hasso, T., 2016. Environmental Performance Focus in Private Family Firms: The Role of Social Embeddedness. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 136(2), pp.293-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2516-x.

28. Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J.A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. and Rueda-Manzanares, A., 2012. The Effect of Internal Barriers on the Connection Between Stakeholder Integration and Proactive Environmental Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 107(3), pp.281-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1039-y.

29. Díaz-Chao, ., Ficapal-Cusí, P. and Torrent-Sellens, J., 2021. Environmental assets, industry 4.0 technologies and firm performance in Spain: A dynamic capabilities path to reward sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 281, no article 125264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125264.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Doluca, H., Wagner, M. and Block, J., 2018. Sustainability and Environmental Behaviour in Family Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis of Environment‐ Related Activities, Innovation and Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, [online] 27(1), pp.152-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1998.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Dou, J., Su, E. and Wang, S., 2019. When Does Family Ownership Promote Proactive Environmental Strategy? The Role of the Firm’s Long-Term Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 158(1), pp.81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3642-z.

32. Elsayed, K., 2006. Reexamining the Expected Effect of Available Resources and Firm Size on Firm Environmental Orientation: An Empirical Study of UK Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 65(3), pp.297-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-6402-z.

33. Fan, Y., Zhang, F. and Zhu, L., 2021. Do family firms invest more in pollution prevention strategy than non-family firms? An integration of agency and institutional theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 286, article no. 124988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124988.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Gadenne, D.L., Kennedy, J. and McKeiver, C., 2009. An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 84(1), pp.45-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9672-9.

35. González, M., Guzmán, A., Pombo, C. and Trujillo, M.-A., 2013. Family firms and debt: Risk aversion versus risk of losing control. Journal of Business Research, [online] 66(11), pp.2308-2320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.014.

36. Hart, S.L., 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), pp.986-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00307.x. Hilliard, I. and Priede, T., 2018. Benchmarking responsible management and non-financial reporting. Benchmarking: An International Journal, [online] 25(8), pp.2931-2949.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. How negative aspiration performance gaps affect innovation efficiency. Small Business Economics, [online] 54(1), pp.209-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0091-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Hu, S. and Wang, X., 2021. The Origin of Proactive Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) of Large Firms: Institutional Embeddedness – Driven, Family Involvement-Promoted, or Resource-Dependent? Sustainability, [online] 13(3), article no. 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031197.

39. Kallio, T.J. and Nordberg, P., 2006. The Evolution of Organizations and Natural Environment Discourse: Some Critical Remarks. Organization & Environment, [online] 19(4), pp.439-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026606294955.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Kotlar, J., Fang, H., De Massis, A. and Frattini, F., 2014. Profitability Goals, Control Goals, and the R&D Investment Decisions of Family and Nonfamily Firms: R&D Investment Decisions of Family Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, [online] 31(6), pp.1128-1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12165.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

41. Labelle, R., Hafsi, T., Francoeur, C. and Ben Amar, W., 2018. Family Firms’ Corporate Social Performance: A Calculated Quest for Socioemotional Wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 148(3), pp.511-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2982-9.

42. Laguir, I., Laguir, L. and Elbaz, J., 2016. Are Family Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises More Socially Responsible Than Nonfamily Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises?: Are Family SMEs More Socially Responsible Than Nonfamily SMEs? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, [online] 23(6), pp.386-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1384.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

43. Le Breton-Miller, I. and Miller, D., 2022. Family businesses under COVID-19: Inspiring models – Sometimes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, [online] 13(2), article no. 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100452.

44. Li, Z., Liao, G. and Albitar, K., 2020. Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, [online] 29(3), article no. 1045-1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416.

45. Liu, T., Liang, D., Zhang, Y., Song, Y. and Xing, X., 2019. The antecedent and performance of environmental managers’ proactive pollution reduction behavior in Chinese manufacturing firms: Insight from the proactive behavior theory. Journal of Environmental Management, [online] 242, pp.327-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jenvman.2019.04.050.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. López-Cózar-Navarro, C., Priede-Bergamini, T., and Benito-Hernandez, S., 2017. The Link between Firm Size and Corporate Social Responsibility. Ethical Perspectives, 24(2), pp.259-296. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.24.2.3218004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Martínez-Alonso, R., Martínez-Romero, M.J. and Rojo-Ramírez, A.A., 2019. Examining the Impact of Innovation Forms on Sustainable Economic Performance: The Influence of Family Management. Sustainability, [online] 11(21), article no. 6132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11216132.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Martínez-Ferrero, J., Rodríguez-Ariza, L. and García-Sánchez, I.-M., 2016. Corporate social responsibility as an entrenchment strategy, with a focus on the implications of family ownership. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 135, pp.760-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.133.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Mazzelli, A., Kotlar, J. and De Massis, A., 2018. Blending In While Standing Out: Selective Conformity and New Product Introduction in Family Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, [online] 42(2), pp.206-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717748651.

50. Michiels, A. and Molly, V., 2017. Financing Decisions in Family Businesses: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field. Family Business Review, [online] 30(4), pp.369399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517736958.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
51. Micro and Macroeconomic Impact of the EU Energy Policy AE Vol. 25 • No. 63 • May 2023 517 Bendell, B.L., 2022. Environmental investment decisions of family firms – An analysis of competitor and government influence. Business Strategy and the Environment, [online] 31(1), pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2870.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
52. Micro and Macroeconomic Impact of the EU Energy Policy AE Vol. 25 • No. 63 • May 2023 519 Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., Murillo-Luna, J.L. and Suárez-Gálvez, C., 2022. Does it pay more to be green in family firms than in non-family firms? Review of Managerial Science, [online] 16(5), pp.1365-1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00475-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
53. Micro and Macroeconomic Impact of the EU Energy Policy AE Vol. 25 • No. 63 • May 2023 521 Rubino, F. and Napoli, F., 2020. What Impact Does Corporate Governance Have on Corporate Environmental Performances? An Empirical Study of Italian Listed Firms. Sustainability, [online] 12(14), no article 5742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12145742.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Miroshnychenko, I. and De Massis, A., 2022. Sustainability practices of family and nonfamily firms: A worldwide study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [online] 174, article no. 121079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121079.

55. Paraschiv, D.M., Nemoianu, E.L., Langă, C.A. and Szabó, T., 2012. Eco-innovation, responsible leadership and organizational change for corporate sustainability. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 14(32), pp.404-419.

56. Potrich, L., Cortimiglia, M.N. and De Medeiros, J.F., 2019. A systematic literature review on firm-level proactive environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, [online] 243, pp.273-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.110.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Priede-Bergamini, T., López-Cózar-Navarro, C. and Benito Hernández, S., 2020. Cooperation behaviour towards innovation examining differences between family and non-family businesses. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(3), pp.310-328.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
58. Quintana‐ García, C., Marchante‐ Lara, M. and Benavides‐ Chicón, C.G., 2022. Towards sustainable development: Environmental innovation, cleaner production performance, and reputation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, [online] 29(5), pp.1330-1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

59. Rahman, N. and Post, C., 2012. Measurement Issues in Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR): Toward a Transparent, Reliable, and Construct Valid Instrument. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 105(3), pp.307-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0967-x.

60. Rees, W. and Rodionova, T., 2015. The Influence of Family Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility: An International Analysis of Publicly Listed Companies: Families and CSR. Corporate Governance: An International Review, [online] 23(3), pp.184-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12086.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
61. Rydvalová, P., Horynová, E.K. and Zbránková, M., 2016. Family Business as Source of Municipality Development in the Czech Republic. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, [online] 18(41), pp.168-183. Available at: <https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/ 168994> [Accessed 21 January 2023].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. Samara, G., Jamali, D., Sierra, V. and Parada, M.J., 2018. Who are the best performers? The environmental social performance of family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, [online] 9(1), pp.33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.11.004.

63. Sharma, S. and Starik, M., 2009. Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, [online] 21(3), pp.288-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2004.tb00343.x. Sharma, P. and Sharma, S., 2011. Drivers of Proactive Environmental Strategy in Family Firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, [online] 21(2), pp.309-334. https://doi.org/10.5840/ beq201121218.

64. Sustainable product innovation in agri-food industry: Do ownership structure and capital structure matter? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, [online] 7(1), article no. 100160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.100160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

65. Uhlaner, L.M., Berent-Braun, M.M., Jeurissen, R.J.M. and De Wit, G., 2012. Beyond Size: Predicting Engagement in Environmental Management Practices of Dutch SMEs.

1. To win the marketplace, you must first win the workplace: CEO ability, CSR, and firm performance: evidence from fast-growing firms in Asia–Pacific. (2025). Elshareif, Elgilani ; Ur-Rehman, Saif ; Abidi, Naseem.
   In: International Journal of Disclosure and Governance.
   RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41310-023-00222-3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Does it Pay to Patent Green Innovations? Stock Market Reactions to Family and Nonfamily Firms’ Green Patents. (2025). Eddleston, Kimberly A ; Patel, Pankaj C ; Chirico, Francesco.
   In: Journal of Business Ethics.
   RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:198:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-025-05942-w.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Sources of CEO power and firm mergers & acquisitions——Evidence from Chinese listed family firms. (2025). Wang, Haicheng ; Deng, Yuping ; Liu, Cenjie.
   In: The North American Journal of Economics and Finance.
   RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:75:y:2025:i:pa:s1062940824002158.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The relative importance of ESG pillars: A two‐step machine learning and analytical framework. (2024). Asiaei, Kaveh ; Mashayekhi, Bita ; Jahangard, Amin ; Homayoun, Saeid ; Samavat, Milad ; Rezaee, Zabihollah.
   In: Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:5:p:5404-5420.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The power of CEO growing up in poverty: Enabling better corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. (2024). Liu, Yang ; Zhang, Han.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:1610-1633.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. ESG-driven innovation strategy and firm performance. (2024). Cabaleiro-Cervio, Goretti ; Mendi, Pedro.
   In: Eurasian Business Review.
   RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:14:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40821-024-00254-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Are corporate environmental, social, and governance practices contagious? The peer-effect perspective. (2024). Wu, Woran ; Hong, YU ; Du, Pengcheng ; Huang, Shijun.
   In: Energy & Environment.
   RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:8:p:4049-4082.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field. (2024). Schell, Sabrina ; Putz, Laura ; Stock, Christoph ; Werner, Arndt.
   In: Journal of Business Ethics.
   RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:190:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05382-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Family firms and carbon emissions. (2024). Kowalewski, Oskar ; Eugster, Nicolas ; Klein, Paul-Olivier ; Borsuk, Marcin.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04710120.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Corporate Social Responsibility in Canadian Family Businesses: A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective. (2024). Mnif, Yosra ; Ertz, Myriam ; Kchaou, Jihene ; Latrous, Imen.
    In: IJFS.
    RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:68-:d:1434209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Corporate social responsibility in family business: Using machine learning to uncover who is doing good. (2024). Huang, Wanying ; Fang, Mingjie ; Zhang, Jing ; Liu, Feng.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24000010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Corporate litigation risk, institutional investor shareholding and corporate ESG performance. (2024). Ma, Wen ; Wu, Jiangning.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Green finance and environmental, social, and governance performance. (2024). Yu, Wenzhe ; Qian, Shuitu.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pa:p:1185-1202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Data assets and corporate sustainable development: evidence from ESG in China. (2024). Li, Yuetong ; Wang, Xinyi ; Zheng, Xiaojia.
    In: Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:85:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x2400129x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Does family culture hamper corporate deceptive green behavior decision-making?. (2024). Guo, Yichen ; Zhang, Dongyang ; Vigne, Samuel A.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:228:y:2024:i:c:s0167268124004268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Family firm, financial constraint, and environmental preparedness: An international study. (2024). Haider, Zulfiquer ; Wang, Yuan.
    In: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money.
    RePEc:eee:intfin:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s1042443124000453.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Bank deregulation and corporate social responsibility. (2024). Zhou, Yue ; Wu, Qiang ; Liu, Frank Hong.
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:74:y:2024:i:c:s1572308924000986.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Roots and rewards: Exploring the symbiotic relationship between familism and Chinese family business philanthropy. (2024). Ren, Jingfei ; Yang, Yunfan ; Tang, Yingkai ; Wang, Kun.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:70:y:2024:i:c:s1544612324013771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Subjective perception of economic policy uncertainty and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. (2024). Nie, Huihua ; Shen, Xinyi ; Ruan, Rui ; Li, Jing.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1057521923005380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Geopolitical risk and stock price crash risk: The mitigating role of ESG performance. (2024). Verdoliva, Vincenzo ; Fiorillo, Paolo ; Pellegrino, Luigi Raffaele ; Meles, Antonio.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s105752192300474x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Does voluntary environmental information disclosure prevent stock price crash risk? – Comparative analysis of chaebol and non-chaebol in Korea. (2024). Bae, Mincheol ; Sohn, Joongchan ; Cho, Jin Hyung ; Lee, Gunhee ; Han, Chanwoo.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324001026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Family firms and carbon emissions. (2024). Kowalewski, Oskar ; Borsuk, Marcin ; Klein, Paul-Olivier ; Eugster, Nicolas.
    In: Journal of Corporate Finance.
    RePEc:eee:corfin:v:89:y:2024:i:c:s0929119924001342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Digitalisation and environmental management activities: The effects of family ownership`. (2024). Issah, Wunnam Basit ; Sharif, Taimur ; Ferdous, Lutfa Tilat ; Bhuiyan, Faruk.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:5:p:4351-4374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. CEO tenure and environmental fraud for listed family firms. (2024). Zhang, Yifei ; Wang, Yang ; Chang, Xiao ; Kang, Wei.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:3:p:1887-1905.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Corporate social responsibility, family involvement, and stock price crash risk. (2023). Wang, Yan ; Maresova, Petra ; Yang, Minghui ; Bai, LU.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:1204-1225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Family Ownership and Carbon Emissions. (2023). Kowalewski, Oskar ; Eugster, Nicolas ; Klein, Paul-Olivier ; Borsuk, Marcin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ies:wpaper:f202301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The Theoretical Lineage and Evolutionary Logic of Research on the Environmental Behavior of Family Firms: A Literature Review. (2023). Lu, Xueyuan ; Geng, Limin ; Zhang, Can.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4768-:d:1091040.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The spillover effect of customers ESG to suppliers. (2023). Wang, Xiaoming ; Liu, Qigui ; Tang, Jinghua.
    In: Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:78:y:2023:i:c:s0927538x23000136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. A dynamic capabilities perspective to socially responsible family business: Implications on social-based advantage and market performance. (2023). Christodoulides, Paul ; Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P ; Leonidou, Leonidas C ; Eduardsen, Jonas Stromfeldt.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:155:y:2023:i:pa:s0148296322008554.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. How does family exit affect family business financialization?. (2023). Wang, Yuran ; Li, Huxing ; Zhang, Heng.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:58:y:2023:i:pb:s1544612323008218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Stock market openness and ESG performance: Evidence from Shanghai-Hong Kong connect program. (2023). Wang, YE ; Liu, Xufeng.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:78:y:2023:i:c:p:1306-1319.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Does going abroad lead to going green? Firm outward foreign direct investment and domestic environmental performance. (2023). Long, Wenbin ; Zhong, Qiqi ; Luo, LE ; Sun, Hongfeng.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:484-498.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. How Family Character Affect the Financing of Environmental Protection Strategies and Energy-Saving Measures. (2023). Priede-Bergamini, Tiziana ; Benito-Hernandez, Sonia ; Lopez-Cozar, Cristina.
    In: The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.
    RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:25:y:2023:i:63:p:503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Can controlling family involvement promote firms to fulfill environmental responsibilities?—Evidence from China. (2022). Zhou, Zhifang ; Lai, YU ; Wang, Yanlin ; Bashir, Muhammad Farhan ; Ma, Benjiang.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:2:p:569-592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Competition laws, ownership, and corporate social responsibility. (2022). Lin, Chen ; Levine, Ross ; Ding, Wenzhi ; Xie, Wensi.
    In: Journal of International Business Studies.
    RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:53:y:2022:i:8:d:10.1057_s41267-022-00536-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Environment Sustainability Is a Corporate Social Responsibility: Measuring the Nexus between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Big Data Analytics Capabilities, and Organizational Performance. (2022). Shahzad, Fakhar ; Wattoo, Muhammad Umair ; Du, Jianguo ; Zhu, Changchun.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3379-:d:770521.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Unveiling the Direct Effects of Family Firm Heterogeneity on Environmental Performance. (2022). Boronat-Navarro, Montserrat ; Fernandez-Yaez, Jose Maria ; Fores, Beatriz ; Puig-Denia, Alba.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10442-:d:894781.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. La pianificazione della sostenibilit? nelle aziende familiari: il ruolo dei key value drivers. (2022). Camilli, Riccardo ; Hristov, Ivo ; Ranalli, Francesco ; Chirico, Antonio.
    In: MANAGEMENT CONTROL.
    RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2022-003006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Open knowledge disclosure and technical standard competition in transition economies: A legitimacy perspective. (2022). Liu, Ziyu ; Du, Yushen.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:70:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22001427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Substantial response or impression management? Compliance strategies for sustainable development responsibility in family firms. (2022). Shen, Xinyan ; Jin, Chenfei ; Wu, Bao ; Monfort, Abel.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521006478.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Family firms as agents of sustainable development: A normative perspective. (2022). Ernst, Robin-Alexander ; Hulsbeck, Marcel ; Gerken, Maike ; Hack, Andreas.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521005680.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Controlling shareholder pledging and corporate ESG behavior. (2022). Luo, Yan ; Wang, Xiaohuan ; Huang, Wei ; Xiao, Lifu.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:61:y:2022:i:c:s0275531922000435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Business Tax reform and CSR engagement: Evidence from China. (2022). Qin, NI ; Xiong, Mengxu ; Kong, Dongmin.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:82:y:2022:i:c:s1057521922001417.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Natural extreme events, government subsidies and corporate environment responsibility: Evidence from Chinas energy sector. (2022). Li, Shuangyan.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:114:y:2022:i:c:s0140988322004145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Family control, institutional cross holding and corporate social responsibility. (2022). Hamza, Taher ; Benkraiem, Ramzi ; Nizar, Hamza ; Lakhal, Faten.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-22-00071.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical research using Thomson Reuters Asset4 data. (2022). Li, Zhongtian ; Jia, Jing ; de Villiers, Charl.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:62:y:2022:i:4:p:4523-4568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. CEO Characteristics, Family Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: The Case of Saudi Arabia. (2021). Wan-Hussin, Wan Nordin ; Al-Duais, Shaker Dahan ; Thomran, Murad ; Bamahros, Hasan Mohamad ; Qasem, Ameen ; Alquhaif, Abdulsalam.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12237-:d:673114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The impact of government intervention on corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Chinas national civilized city award. (2021). Hao, Ying ; Liu, Qiang ; Ge, Guoqing ; Zhang, Chi.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:39:y:2021:i:c:s1544612319307275.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. (2021). Gillan, Stuart L ; Starks, Laura T ; Koch, Andrew.
    In: Journal of Corporate Finance.
    RePEc:eee:corfin:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0929119921000092.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Family ownership and stockholder reactions to environmental performance disclosure: A test of secondary agency relationships. (2021). Cordeiro, James J ; Tutore, Ilaria ; Profumo, Giorgia.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:2091-2107.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-20 22:14:36 || Missing content? Let us know