This document has not been cited yet.

1. ---. 2003. Willingness to pay for curbside recycling with detection and mitigation of hypothetical bias. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85:492-502.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Aadland, D., and A.J. Caplan. 2006. Cheap talk reconsidered: New evidence from CVM. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60:562-578.

3. Ami, D., et al. 2011. A test of cheap talk in different hypothetical contexts: The case of air pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics 50:111-130.

4. Arrow, K., et al. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Washington, DC: Federal Register.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Blomquist, G.C., K. Blumenschein, and M. Johannesson. 2009. Eliciting willingness to pay without bias using follow-up certainty statements: comparisons between probably/definitely and a 10-point certainty scale. Environmental and Resource Economics 43:473-502.

6. Blumenschein, K. 1998. Experimental Results on Expressed Certainty and Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation. Southern Economic Journal 65:169-177.

7. Brown, T.C., I. Ajzen, and D. Hrubes. 2003. Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46:353–361.

8. Bulte, E., et al. 2005. The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49:330-342.

9. Cameron, T.A., et al. 2002. Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: are the underlying preferences the same? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44:391-425.

10. Carlsson, F., et al. 2013. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth—A multiple country test of an oath script. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 89:105-121.

11. Carson, R.T., and T. Groves. 2007. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 37:181-210.

12. Champ, P.A., et al. 1997. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33:151-162.

13. Clark, J. 2002. House money effects in public good experiments. Experimental Economics 5:223-231.

14. Cummings, R.G., and L.O. Taylor. 1999. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review 89:649-665.

15. Cummings, R.G., and L.O. Taylor. 1999. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. The American Economic Review 89:649-665.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

16. de-Magistris, T., A. Gracia, and R.M. Nayga. 2013. On the Use of Honesty Priming Tasks to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95:11361154.

17. Ehmke, M.D., J.L. Lusk, and J.A. List. 2008. Is hypothetical bias a universal phenomenon? A multinational investigation. Land Economics 84:489-500.

18. Haab, T.C., and K.E. McConnell. 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation: Edward Elgar Publishing.

19. Herriges, J., et al. 2010. What are the consequences of consequentiality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59:67-81.

20. Interis, M., and D. Petrolia. 2014. The effects of consequentiality in binary-and multinomial-choice surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39:201-216.

21. Jacquemet, N., et al. 2013. Preference elicitation under oath. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65:110-132.

22. Kemper, N., et al. (2016) The Effects of Honesty Oath and Consequentiality in Choice Experiments. In 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, 2016, Boston, Massachusetts. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

23. Lewis, K.E., C. Grebitus, and R.M. Nayga. 2016. US consumers’ preferences for imported and genetically modified sugar: Examining policy consequentiality in a choice experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 65:1-8.

24. Li, X., et al. 2016. Consumer willingness to pay for beef grown using climate friendly production practices. Food Policy 64:93-106.

25. List, J.A. 2001. Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards. The American Economic Review 91:1498-1507.

26. Loureiro, M.L., W.J. Umberger, and S. Hine. 2003. Testing the initial endowment effect in experimental auctions. Applied Economics Letters 10:271-275.

27. Mitchell, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method: Resources for the Future.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Morrison, M., and T.C. Brown. 2009. Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies. Environmental and Resource Economics 44:307-326.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Murphy, J.J., et al. 2005. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 30:313–325.

30. Nepal, M., R.P. Berrens, and A.K. Bohara. 2009. Assessing perceived consequentiality: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey on global climate change. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statisticsâ„¢ 14:14-29.

31. Poe, G.L., et al. 2002. Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 23:105-131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
32. Vásquez, W.F., and D. Franceschi. 2013. System reliability and water service decentralization: Investigating household preferences in Nicaragua. Water resources management 27:49134926.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Vásquez, W.F., et al. 2009. Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: Evidence from Parral, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management 90:3391-3400.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Estimation of Households’ and Businesses’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Reliability of Electricity Supply in Nepal. (2018). Jenkins, Glenn ; Niroomand, Naghmeh.
   In: Development Discussion Papers.
   RePEc:qed:dpaper:404.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Eco-labeling in the Fresh Produce Market: Not All Environmentally Friendly Labels Are Equally Valued. (2018). House, Lisa ; Gao, Zhifeng ; Chen, Xuqi ; Zhao, Xin ; Swisher, Marilyn.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:154:y:2018:i:c:p:201-210.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Mekong River Delta farm-household willingness to pay for salinity intrusion risk reduction. (2018). Young, Michael ; Loch, Adam ; Khong, Tien Dung ; Thennakoon, Jayanthi.
   In: Agricultural Water Management.
   RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:200:y:2018:i:c:p:80-89.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Factors affecting farmers’ WTP for innovative fertilizer against soil salinity. (2018). Klonaris, Stathis ; Tsigou, Stavroula.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:aua:wpaper:2018-3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Mitigating Hypothetical Bias: An Application to WTP for Beach Conditions Information. (2018). Petrolia, Daniel ; Quainoo, Ruth.
   In: 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida.
   RePEc:ags:saea18:266715.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Cheap Talk, Consequentiality, and Certainty Follow-up as Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Techniques: A Cross Country Comparison. (2018). Hu, Wuyang ; Ye, Tao ; Penn, Jerrod.
   In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
   RePEc:ags:aaea18:274018.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Consumers willingness to offset their CO2 emissions from traveling: A discrete choice analysis of framing and provider contributions. (2017). Schleich, Joachim ; Dutschke, Elisabeth ; Schwirplies, Claudia ; Ziegler, Andreas.
   In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
   RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s052017.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Effects of payment vehicle non-attendance in choice experiments on value estimates and the WTA–WTP disparity. (2017). Koetse, Mark J.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
   RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:225-245.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations. (2017). Uehleke, Reinhard ; Sturm, Bodo.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:67:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0028-0.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Economic evaluation of environmental externalities in China’s coal-fired power generation. (2017). Ma, Chunbo ; Hu, Yanan ; Zhao, Xiaoli ; Li, William ; Cai, Qiong ; Luo, Kaiyan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:307-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. How Sensitive Are Environmental Valuations To Economic Downturns?. (2017). Loomis, John ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:140:y:2017:i:c:p:235-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Product Line Extension in Consumer Software Markets in the Presence of Free Alternatives. (2016). Raghu, T S ; Sinha, Rajiv K ; Miller, Chadwick J ; Baird, Aaron.
    In: Information Systems Research.
    RePEc:inm:orisre:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:282-301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certaintyAuthor-Name: Beck, Matthew J.. (2016). Rose, John ; Fifer, Simon .
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:149-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Making the Most of Cheap Talk in an Online Survey. (2016). Hu, Wuyang ; Penn, Jerrod.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:236171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A Contingent Valuation Approach to Estimating Regulatory Costs: Mexico’s Day Without Driving Program. (2015). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Blackman, Allen ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco ; Planter, Marisol Rivera.
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-15-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Hypothetical bias for private goods: does cheap talk make a difference?. (2015). Saulais, Laure ; Ruffieux, Bernard ; Doyon, Maurice ; Bweli, Denise .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01254936.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Evaluating mitigation and calibration techniques for hypothetical bias in choice experiments. (2014). Broadbent, Craig D..
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
    RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:12:p:1831-1848.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys. (2014). Olsen, Søren ; Ladenburg, Jacob.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:37:y:2014:i:c:p:39-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Testing the single opt-out reminder in choice experiments: An application to fuel break management in Spain. (2014). Soliño, Mario ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Giergiczny, Marek ; Riera, Pere ; Solio, Mario ; Varela, Elsa.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:212-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Using Field Experiments in Environmental and Resource Economics. (2013). Price, Michael ; List, John.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Using Field Experiments in Environmental and Resource Economics. (2013). Price, Michael ; List, John.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Behavioral foundations of environmental economics and valuation. (2013). McConnell, Kenneth E. ; Horowitz, John K. ; Murphy, James J..
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:12964_4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Preference elicitation under oath. (2013). Shogren, Jason ; Luchini, Stéphane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Joule, Robert-Vincent.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:65:y:2013:i:1:p:110-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application. (2013). Kanchanaroek, Yingluk ; Termansen, Mette ; Quinn, Claire .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:363-373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. ‘When to Take “No” for an Answer’? Using Entreaties to Reduce Protests in Contingent Valuation Studies. (2012). Provins, Allan ; Mourato, Susana ; Atkinson, Giles ; Morse-Jones, Sian.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:497-523.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Environmental pricing of externalities from different sources of electricity generation in Chile. (2012). Longo, Alberto ; Hutchinson, George W. ; Aravena, Claudia.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:1214-1225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Bias on the Intensive and Extensive Margins of Choice?. (2012). Taylor, Laura ; Taylor Laura O., ; Ryan, Bosworth .
    In: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:12:y:2012:i:1:p:1-28:n:56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Behavioral Foundations of Environmental Economics and Valuation. (2012). Murphy, James ; McConnell, Kenneth E. ; Horowitz, John K..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ala:wpaper:2012-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Discrete Choice Modeling of Consumer Preferences for Sustainably Produced Steak and Apples. (2012). Tonsor, Glynn ; Shupp, Robert ; Sackett, Hillary M..
    In: 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium.
    RePEc:ags:aaeafe:123517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A Test of Cheap Talk in Different Hypothetical Contexts: The Case of Air Pollution. (2011). CHANEL, Olivier ; Aprahamian, Frédéric ; Luchini, Stephane.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:50:y:2011:i:1:p:111-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Social Psychology and Environmental Economics: A New Look at ex ante Corrections of Biased Preference Evaluation. (2011). Shogren, Jason ; James, Alexander ; Jacquemet, Nicolas.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:48:y:2011:i:3:p:413-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2011). Shogren, Jason ; James, Alexander ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Luchini, Stephane.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00584247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab. (2011). Kroll, Stephan ; Kallbekken, Steffen ; Cherry, Todd.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:62:y:2011:i:1:p:53-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. The effect of power outages and cheap talk on willingness to pay to reduce outages. (2011). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Akay, Alpaslan.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:33:y:2011:i:5:p:790-798.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. A Comparison of Induced Value and Home-Grown Value Experiments to Test for Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation. (2010). Murphy, James.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:47:y:2010:i:1:p:111-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2010). Shogren, Jason ; James, Alexander ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Luchini, Stephane.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00462193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Gender anomalies in Stated Preference surveys – Are biases really gender dependent?. (2010). Olsen, Søren ; Ladenburg, Jacob.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2010_01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Using Choice Experiments to Estimate Wetland Values in Viet Nam: Implementation and Practical Issues. (2010). Do, Thang Nam ; Bennett, Jeff.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Concluding Remarks and Recommendations for Implementing Choice Experiments in Developing Countries. (2010). Bennett, Jeff ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Choice Experiments in Developing Countries. (2010). Birol, Ekin ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Books.
    RePEc:elg:eebook:13208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Economic valuation of a contemporary art museum: correction of hypothetical bias using a certainty question. (2009). Herrero, Luis César ; Sanz, Jose ; Bedate, Ana .
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:33:y:2009:i:3:p:185-199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies. (2009). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:307-326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. The Effect of Power Outages and Cheap Talk on Willingness to Pay to Reduce Outages. (2009). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Akay, Alpaslan.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias. (2009). Bishop, Richard C. ; Moore, Rebecca ; Champ, Patricia A..
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:55867.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation. (2007). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David ; Phillips, Owen.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:35:y:2007:i:2:p:149-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program. (2007). Grijalva, Therese ; Caplan, Arthur ; Bohara, Alok.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:64:y:2007:i:2:p:433-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. On the Use of Cheap Talk in New Product Valuation. (2007). Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., ; Brummett, Robert G..
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:2:y:2007:i:1:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. On the Use of Cheap Talk in New Product Valuation. (2007). Wu, Ximing ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., ; Brummett, Robert G..
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-07b40001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Do Experience and Cheap Talk influence Willingness to Pay in an Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey?. (2006). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. A Bayesian Examination of Anchoring Bias and Cheap Talks in Constructed Markets. (2005). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 12:20:37 || Missing content? Let us know